Cargando…
Prognostic Implications of Fractional Flow Reserve After Coronary Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
IMPORTANCE: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is generally considered to reflect residual disease. Yet the clinical relevance of post-PCI FFR after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical relevance of post-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9500557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36136329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.32842 |
_version_ | 1784795249348968448 |
---|---|
author | Hwang, Doyeon Koo, Bon-Kwon Zhang, Jinlong Park, Jiesuck Yang, Seokhun Kim, Minsang Yun, Jun Pil Lee, Joo Myung Nam, Chang-Wook Shin, Eun-Seok Doh, Joon-Hyung Chen, Shao-Liang Kakuta, Tsunekazu Toth, Gabor G. Piroth, Zsolt Johnson, Nils P. Pijls, Nico H. J. Hakeem, Abdul Uretsky, Barry F. Hokama, Yohei Tanaka, Nobuhiro Lim, Hong-Seok Ito, Tsuyoshi Matsuo, Akiko Azzalini, Lorenzo Leesar, Massoud A. Neleman, Tara van Mieghem, Nicolas M. Diletti, Roberto Daemen, Joost Collison, Damien Collet, Carlos De Bruyne, Bernard |
author_facet | Hwang, Doyeon Koo, Bon-Kwon Zhang, Jinlong Park, Jiesuck Yang, Seokhun Kim, Minsang Yun, Jun Pil Lee, Joo Myung Nam, Chang-Wook Shin, Eun-Seok Doh, Joon-Hyung Chen, Shao-Liang Kakuta, Tsunekazu Toth, Gabor G. Piroth, Zsolt Johnson, Nils P. Pijls, Nico H. J. Hakeem, Abdul Uretsky, Barry F. Hokama, Yohei Tanaka, Nobuhiro Lim, Hong-Seok Ito, Tsuyoshi Matsuo, Akiko Azzalini, Lorenzo Leesar, Massoud A. Neleman, Tara van Mieghem, Nicolas M. Diletti, Roberto Daemen, Joost Collison, Damien Collet, Carlos De Bruyne, Bernard |
author_sort | Hwang, Doyeon |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is generally considered to reflect residual disease. Yet the clinical relevance of post-PCI FFR after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical relevance of post-PCI FFR measurement after DES implantation. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant published articles from inception to June 18, 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Published articles that reported post-PCI FFR after DES implantation and its association with clinical outcomes were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Patient-level data were collected from the corresponding authors of 17 cohorts using a standardized spreadsheet. Meta-estimates for primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed per patient and using mixed-effects Cox proportional hazard regression with registry identifiers included as a random effect. All processes followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF) at 2 years, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). The secondary outcome was a composite of cardiac death or TVMI at 2 years. RESULTS: Of 2268 articles identified, 29 studies met selection criteria. Of these, 28 articles from 17 cohorts provided data, including a total of 5277 patients with 5869 vessels who underwent FFR measurement after DES implantation. Mean (SD) age was 64.4 (10.1) years and 4141 patients (78.5%) were men. Median (IQR) post-PCI FFR was 0.89 (0.84-0.94) and 690 vessels (11.8%) had a post-PCI FFR of 0.80 or below. The cumulative incidence of TVF was 340 patients (7.2%), with cardiac death or TVMI occurring in 111 patients (2.4%) at 2 years. Lower post-PCI FFR significantly increased the risk of TVF (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] per 0.01 FFR decrease, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.05; P < .001). The risk of cardiac death or MI also increased inversely with post-PCI FFR (adjusted HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.07, P = .049). These associations were consistent regardless of age, sex, the presence of hypertension or diabetes, and clinical diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Reduced FFR after DES implantation was common and associated with the risks of TVF and of cardiac death or TVMI. These results indicate the prognostic value of post-PCI physiologic assessment after DES implantation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9500557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95005572022-10-18 Prognostic Implications of Fractional Flow Reserve After Coronary Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Hwang, Doyeon Koo, Bon-Kwon Zhang, Jinlong Park, Jiesuck Yang, Seokhun Kim, Minsang Yun, Jun Pil Lee, Joo Myung Nam, Chang-Wook Shin, Eun-Seok Doh, Joon-Hyung Chen, Shao-Liang Kakuta, Tsunekazu Toth, Gabor G. Piroth, Zsolt Johnson, Nils P. Pijls, Nico H. J. Hakeem, Abdul Uretsky, Barry F. Hokama, Yohei Tanaka, Nobuhiro Lim, Hong-Seok Ito, Tsuyoshi Matsuo, Akiko Azzalini, Lorenzo Leesar, Massoud A. Neleman, Tara van Mieghem, Nicolas M. Diletti, Roberto Daemen, Joost Collison, Damien Collet, Carlos De Bruyne, Bernard JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is generally considered to reflect residual disease. Yet the clinical relevance of post-PCI FFR after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical relevance of post-PCI FFR measurement after DES implantation. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant published articles from inception to June 18, 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Published articles that reported post-PCI FFR after DES implantation and its association with clinical outcomes were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Patient-level data were collected from the corresponding authors of 17 cohorts using a standardized spreadsheet. Meta-estimates for primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed per patient and using mixed-effects Cox proportional hazard regression with registry identifiers included as a random effect. All processes followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF) at 2 years, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). The secondary outcome was a composite of cardiac death or TVMI at 2 years. RESULTS: Of 2268 articles identified, 29 studies met selection criteria. Of these, 28 articles from 17 cohorts provided data, including a total of 5277 patients with 5869 vessels who underwent FFR measurement after DES implantation. Mean (SD) age was 64.4 (10.1) years and 4141 patients (78.5%) were men. Median (IQR) post-PCI FFR was 0.89 (0.84-0.94) and 690 vessels (11.8%) had a post-PCI FFR of 0.80 or below. The cumulative incidence of TVF was 340 patients (7.2%), with cardiac death or TVMI occurring in 111 patients (2.4%) at 2 years. Lower post-PCI FFR significantly increased the risk of TVF (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] per 0.01 FFR decrease, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.05; P < .001). The risk of cardiac death or MI also increased inversely with post-PCI FFR (adjusted HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.07, P = .049). These associations were consistent regardless of age, sex, the presence of hypertension or diabetes, and clinical diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Reduced FFR after DES implantation was common and associated with the risks of TVF and of cardiac death or TVMI. These results indicate the prognostic value of post-PCI physiologic assessment after DES implantation. American Medical Association 2022-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9500557/ /pubmed/36136329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.32842 Text en Copyright 2022 Hwang D et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Hwang, Doyeon Koo, Bon-Kwon Zhang, Jinlong Park, Jiesuck Yang, Seokhun Kim, Minsang Yun, Jun Pil Lee, Joo Myung Nam, Chang-Wook Shin, Eun-Seok Doh, Joon-Hyung Chen, Shao-Liang Kakuta, Tsunekazu Toth, Gabor G. Piroth, Zsolt Johnson, Nils P. Pijls, Nico H. J. Hakeem, Abdul Uretsky, Barry F. Hokama, Yohei Tanaka, Nobuhiro Lim, Hong-Seok Ito, Tsuyoshi Matsuo, Akiko Azzalini, Lorenzo Leesar, Massoud A. Neleman, Tara van Mieghem, Nicolas M. Diletti, Roberto Daemen, Joost Collison, Damien Collet, Carlos De Bruyne, Bernard Prognostic Implications of Fractional Flow Reserve After Coronary Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title | Prognostic Implications of Fractional Flow Reserve After Coronary Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full | Prognostic Implications of Fractional Flow Reserve After Coronary Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Prognostic Implications of Fractional Flow Reserve After Coronary Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic Implications of Fractional Flow Reserve After Coronary Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_short | Prognostic Implications of Fractional Flow Reserve After Coronary Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_sort | prognostic implications of fractional flow reserve after coronary stenting: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9500557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36136329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.32842 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hwangdoyeon prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT koobonkwon prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangjinlong prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT parkjiesuck prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yangseokhun prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kimminsang prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yunjunpil prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leejoomyung prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT namchangwook prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shineunseok prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dohjoonhyung prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenshaoliang prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kakutatsunekazu prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tothgaborg prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pirothzsolt prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT johnsonnilsp prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pijlsnicohj prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hakeemabdul prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT uretskybarryf prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hokamayohei prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tanakanobuhiro prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT limhongseok prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT itotsuyoshi prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT matsuoakiko prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT azzalinilorenzo prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leesarmassouda prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT nelemantara prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vanmieghemnicolasm prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dilettiroberto prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT daemenjoost prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT collisondamien prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT colletcarlos prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT debruynebernard prognosticimplicationsoffractionalflowreserveaftercoronarystentingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |