Cargando…

Multicenter Collaborative Study of the Interaction of Antifungal Combinations against Candida Spp. by Loewe Additivity and Bliss Independence-Based Response Surface Analysis

Combination antifungal therapy is widely used but not well understood. We analyzed the spectrophotometric readings from a multicenter study conducted by the New York State Department of Health to further characterize the in vitro interactions of the major classes of antifungal agents against Candida...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meletiadis, Joseph, Andes, David R., Lockhart, Shawn R., Ghannoum, Mahmoud A., Knapp, Cindy C., Ostrosky-Zeichner, Luis, Pfaller, Michael A., Chaturvedi, Vishnu, Walsh, Thomas J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9500786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36135692
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8090967
_version_ 1784795308051398656
author Meletiadis, Joseph
Andes, David R.
Lockhart, Shawn R.
Ghannoum, Mahmoud A.
Knapp, Cindy C.
Ostrosky-Zeichner, Luis
Pfaller, Michael A.
Chaturvedi, Vishnu
Walsh, Thomas J.
author_facet Meletiadis, Joseph
Andes, David R.
Lockhart, Shawn R.
Ghannoum, Mahmoud A.
Knapp, Cindy C.
Ostrosky-Zeichner, Luis
Pfaller, Michael A.
Chaturvedi, Vishnu
Walsh, Thomas J.
author_sort Meletiadis, Joseph
collection PubMed
description Combination antifungal therapy is widely used but not well understood. We analyzed the spectrophotometric readings from a multicenter study conducted by the New York State Department of Health to further characterize the in vitro interactions of the major classes of antifungal agents against Candida spp. Loewe additivity-based fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICi) analysis and Bliss independence-based response surface (BIRS) analysis were used to analyze two-drug inter- and intraclass combinations of triazoles (AZO) (voriconazole, posaconazole), echinocandins (ECH) (caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin), and a polyene (amphotericin B) against Candida albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. glabrata. Although mean FIC indices did not differ statistically significantly from the additivity range of 0.5–4, indicating no significant pharmacodynamic interactions for all of the strain–combinations tested, BIRS analysis showed that significant pharmacodynamic interactions with the sum of percentages of interactions determined with this analysis were strongly associated with the FIC indices (Χ(2) 646, p < 0.0001). Using a narrower additivity range of 1–2 FIC index analysis, statistically significant pharmacodynamic interactions were also found with FICi and were in agreement with those found with BIRS analysis. All ECH+AB combinations were found to be synergistic against all Candida strains except C. glabrata. For the AZO+AB combinations, synergy was found mostly with the POS+AB combination. All AZO+ECH combinations except POS+CAS were synergistic against all Candida strains although with variable magnitude; significant antagonism was found for the POS+MIF combination against C. albicans. The AZO+AZO combination was additive for all strains except for a C. parapsilosis strain for which antagonism was also observed. The ECH+ECH combinations were synergistic for all Candida strains except C. glabrata for which they were additive; no antagonism was found.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9500786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95007862022-09-24 Multicenter Collaborative Study of the Interaction of Antifungal Combinations against Candida Spp. by Loewe Additivity and Bliss Independence-Based Response Surface Analysis Meletiadis, Joseph Andes, David R. Lockhart, Shawn R. Ghannoum, Mahmoud A. Knapp, Cindy C. Ostrosky-Zeichner, Luis Pfaller, Michael A. Chaturvedi, Vishnu Walsh, Thomas J. J Fungi (Basel) Article Combination antifungal therapy is widely used but not well understood. We analyzed the spectrophotometric readings from a multicenter study conducted by the New York State Department of Health to further characterize the in vitro interactions of the major classes of antifungal agents against Candida spp. Loewe additivity-based fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICi) analysis and Bliss independence-based response surface (BIRS) analysis were used to analyze two-drug inter- and intraclass combinations of triazoles (AZO) (voriconazole, posaconazole), echinocandins (ECH) (caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin), and a polyene (amphotericin B) against Candida albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. glabrata. Although mean FIC indices did not differ statistically significantly from the additivity range of 0.5–4, indicating no significant pharmacodynamic interactions for all of the strain–combinations tested, BIRS analysis showed that significant pharmacodynamic interactions with the sum of percentages of interactions determined with this analysis were strongly associated with the FIC indices (Χ(2) 646, p < 0.0001). Using a narrower additivity range of 1–2 FIC index analysis, statistically significant pharmacodynamic interactions were also found with FICi and were in agreement with those found with BIRS analysis. All ECH+AB combinations were found to be synergistic against all Candida strains except C. glabrata. For the AZO+AB combinations, synergy was found mostly with the POS+AB combination. All AZO+ECH combinations except POS+CAS were synergistic against all Candida strains although with variable magnitude; significant antagonism was found for the POS+MIF combination against C. albicans. The AZO+AZO combination was additive for all strains except for a C. parapsilosis strain for which antagonism was also observed. The ECH+ECH combinations were synergistic for all Candida strains except C. glabrata for which they were additive; no antagonism was found. MDPI 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9500786/ /pubmed/36135692 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8090967 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Meletiadis, Joseph
Andes, David R.
Lockhart, Shawn R.
Ghannoum, Mahmoud A.
Knapp, Cindy C.
Ostrosky-Zeichner, Luis
Pfaller, Michael A.
Chaturvedi, Vishnu
Walsh, Thomas J.
Multicenter Collaborative Study of the Interaction of Antifungal Combinations against Candida Spp. by Loewe Additivity and Bliss Independence-Based Response Surface Analysis
title Multicenter Collaborative Study of the Interaction of Antifungal Combinations against Candida Spp. by Loewe Additivity and Bliss Independence-Based Response Surface Analysis
title_full Multicenter Collaborative Study of the Interaction of Antifungal Combinations against Candida Spp. by Loewe Additivity and Bliss Independence-Based Response Surface Analysis
title_fullStr Multicenter Collaborative Study of the Interaction of Antifungal Combinations against Candida Spp. by Loewe Additivity and Bliss Independence-Based Response Surface Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Multicenter Collaborative Study of the Interaction of Antifungal Combinations against Candida Spp. by Loewe Additivity and Bliss Independence-Based Response Surface Analysis
title_short Multicenter Collaborative Study of the Interaction of Antifungal Combinations against Candida Spp. by Loewe Additivity and Bliss Independence-Based Response Surface Analysis
title_sort multicenter collaborative study of the interaction of antifungal combinations against candida spp. by loewe additivity and bliss independence-based response surface analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9500786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36135692
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8090967
work_keys_str_mv AT meletiadisjoseph multicentercollaborativestudyoftheinteractionofantifungalcombinationsagainstcandidasppbyloeweadditivityandblissindependencebasedresponsesurfaceanalysis
AT andesdavidr multicentercollaborativestudyoftheinteractionofantifungalcombinationsagainstcandidasppbyloeweadditivityandblissindependencebasedresponsesurfaceanalysis
AT lockhartshawnr multicentercollaborativestudyoftheinteractionofantifungalcombinationsagainstcandidasppbyloeweadditivityandblissindependencebasedresponsesurfaceanalysis
AT ghannoummahmouda multicentercollaborativestudyoftheinteractionofantifungalcombinationsagainstcandidasppbyloeweadditivityandblissindependencebasedresponsesurfaceanalysis
AT knappcindyc multicentercollaborativestudyoftheinteractionofantifungalcombinationsagainstcandidasppbyloeweadditivityandblissindependencebasedresponsesurfaceanalysis
AT ostroskyzeichnerluis multicentercollaborativestudyoftheinteractionofantifungalcombinationsagainstcandidasppbyloeweadditivityandblissindependencebasedresponsesurfaceanalysis
AT pfallermichaela multicentercollaborativestudyoftheinteractionofantifungalcombinationsagainstcandidasppbyloeweadditivityandblissindependencebasedresponsesurfaceanalysis
AT chaturvedivishnu multicentercollaborativestudyoftheinteractionofantifungalcombinationsagainstcandidasppbyloeweadditivityandblissindependencebasedresponsesurfaceanalysis
AT walshthomasj multicentercollaborativestudyoftheinteractionofantifungalcombinationsagainstcandidasppbyloeweadditivityandblissindependencebasedresponsesurfaceanalysis