Cargando…

A Comparison of Dinoflagellate Thiolation Domain Binding Proteins Using In Vitro and Molecular Methods

Dinoflagellates play important roles in ecosystems as primary producers and consumers making natural products that can benefit or harm environmental and human health but are also potential therapeutics with unique chemistries. Annotations of dinoflagellate genes have been hampered by large genomes w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Ernest, Bachvaroff, Tsvetan, Place, Allen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9500876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36135770
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/md20090581
_version_ 1784795330445836288
author Williams, Ernest
Bachvaroff, Tsvetan
Place, Allen
author_facet Williams, Ernest
Bachvaroff, Tsvetan
Place, Allen
author_sort Williams, Ernest
collection PubMed
description Dinoflagellates play important roles in ecosystems as primary producers and consumers making natural products that can benefit or harm environmental and human health but are also potential therapeutics with unique chemistries. Annotations of dinoflagellate genes have been hampered by large genomes with many gene copies that reduce the reliability of transcriptomics, quantitative PCR, and targeted knockouts. This study aimed to functionally characterize dinoflagellate proteins by testing their interactions through in vitro assays. Specifically, nine Amphidinium carterae thiolation domains that scaffold natural product synthesis were substituted into an indigoidine synthesizing gene from the bacterium Streptomyces lavendulae and exposed to three A. carterae phosphopantetheinyl transferases that activate synthesis. Unsurprisingly, several of the dinoflagellate versions inhibited the ability to synthesize indigoidine despite being successfully phosphopantetheinated. However, all the transferases were able to phosphopantetheinate all the thiolation domains nearly equally, defying the canon that transferases participate in segregated processes via binding specificity. Moreover, two of the transferases were expressed during growth in alternating patterns while the final transferase was only observed as a breakdown product common to all three. The broad substrate recognition and compensatory expression shown here help explain why phosphopantetheinyl transferases are lost throughout dinoflagellate evolution without a loss in a biochemical process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9500876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95008762022-09-24 A Comparison of Dinoflagellate Thiolation Domain Binding Proteins Using In Vitro and Molecular Methods Williams, Ernest Bachvaroff, Tsvetan Place, Allen Mar Drugs Article Dinoflagellates play important roles in ecosystems as primary producers and consumers making natural products that can benefit or harm environmental and human health but are also potential therapeutics with unique chemistries. Annotations of dinoflagellate genes have been hampered by large genomes with many gene copies that reduce the reliability of transcriptomics, quantitative PCR, and targeted knockouts. This study aimed to functionally characterize dinoflagellate proteins by testing their interactions through in vitro assays. Specifically, nine Amphidinium carterae thiolation domains that scaffold natural product synthesis were substituted into an indigoidine synthesizing gene from the bacterium Streptomyces lavendulae and exposed to three A. carterae phosphopantetheinyl transferases that activate synthesis. Unsurprisingly, several of the dinoflagellate versions inhibited the ability to synthesize indigoidine despite being successfully phosphopantetheinated. However, all the transferases were able to phosphopantetheinate all the thiolation domains nearly equally, defying the canon that transferases participate in segregated processes via binding specificity. Moreover, two of the transferases were expressed during growth in alternating patterns while the final transferase was only observed as a breakdown product common to all three. The broad substrate recognition and compensatory expression shown here help explain why phosphopantetheinyl transferases are lost throughout dinoflagellate evolution without a loss in a biochemical process. MDPI 2022-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9500876/ /pubmed/36135770 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/md20090581 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Williams, Ernest
Bachvaroff, Tsvetan
Place, Allen
A Comparison of Dinoflagellate Thiolation Domain Binding Proteins Using In Vitro and Molecular Methods
title A Comparison of Dinoflagellate Thiolation Domain Binding Proteins Using In Vitro and Molecular Methods
title_full A Comparison of Dinoflagellate Thiolation Domain Binding Proteins Using In Vitro and Molecular Methods
title_fullStr A Comparison of Dinoflagellate Thiolation Domain Binding Proteins Using In Vitro and Molecular Methods
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Dinoflagellate Thiolation Domain Binding Proteins Using In Vitro and Molecular Methods
title_short A Comparison of Dinoflagellate Thiolation Domain Binding Proteins Using In Vitro and Molecular Methods
title_sort comparison of dinoflagellate thiolation domain binding proteins using in vitro and molecular methods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9500876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36135770
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/md20090581
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsernest acomparisonofdinoflagellatethiolationdomainbindingproteinsusinginvitroandmolecularmethods
AT bachvarofftsvetan acomparisonofdinoflagellatethiolationdomainbindingproteinsusinginvitroandmolecularmethods
AT placeallen acomparisonofdinoflagellatethiolationdomainbindingproteinsusinginvitroandmolecularmethods
AT williamsernest comparisonofdinoflagellatethiolationdomainbindingproteinsusinginvitroandmolecularmethods
AT bachvarofftsvetan comparisonofdinoflagellatethiolationdomainbindingproteinsusinginvitroandmolecularmethods
AT placeallen comparisonofdinoflagellatethiolationdomainbindingproteinsusinginvitroandmolecularmethods