Cargando…

Quality Improvement in the Preoperative Evaluation: Accuracy of an Automated Clinical Decision Support System to Calculate CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc Scores

Background and Objectives: Clinical decision support systems are advocated to improve the quality and efficiency in healthcare. However, before implementation, validation of these systems needs to be performed. In this evaluation we tested our hypothesis that a computerized clinical decision support...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Giersbergen, Chantal, Korsten, Hendrikus H. M., De Bie Dekker, Ashley. J. R., Mestrom, Eveline H. J., Bouwman, R. Arthur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9500878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143945
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58091269
_version_ 1784795330971172864
author van Giersbergen, Chantal
Korsten, Hendrikus H. M.
De Bie Dekker, Ashley. J. R.
Mestrom, Eveline H. J.
Bouwman, R. Arthur
author_facet van Giersbergen, Chantal
Korsten, Hendrikus H. M.
De Bie Dekker, Ashley. J. R.
Mestrom, Eveline H. J.
Bouwman, R. Arthur
author_sort van Giersbergen, Chantal
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: Clinical decision support systems are advocated to improve the quality and efficiency in healthcare. However, before implementation, validation of these systems needs to be performed. In this evaluation we tested our hypothesis that a computerized clinical decision support system can calculate the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score just as well compared to manual calculation, or even better and more efficiently than manual calculation in patients with atrial rhythm disturbances. Materials and Methods: In n = 224 patents, we calculated the total CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score manually and by an automated clinical decision support system. We compared the automated clinical decision support system with manually calculation by physicians. Results: The interclass correlation between the automated clinical decision support system and manual calculation showed was 0.859 (0.611 and 0.931 95%-CI). Bland-Altman plot and linear regression analysis shows us a bias of −0.79 with limit of agreement (95%-CI) between 1.37 and −2.95 of the mean between our 2 measurements. The Cohen’s kappa was 0.42. Retrospective analysis showed more human errors than algorithmic errors. Time it took to calculate the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score was 11 s per patient in the automated clinical decision support system compared to 48 s per patient with the physician. Conclusions: Our automated clinical decision support system is at least as good as manual calculation, may be more accurate and is more time efficient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9500878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95008782022-09-24 Quality Improvement in the Preoperative Evaluation: Accuracy of an Automated Clinical Decision Support System to Calculate CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc Scores van Giersbergen, Chantal Korsten, Hendrikus H. M. De Bie Dekker, Ashley. J. R. Mestrom, Eveline H. J. Bouwman, R. Arthur Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: Clinical decision support systems are advocated to improve the quality and efficiency in healthcare. However, before implementation, validation of these systems needs to be performed. In this evaluation we tested our hypothesis that a computerized clinical decision support system can calculate the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score just as well compared to manual calculation, or even better and more efficiently than manual calculation in patients with atrial rhythm disturbances. Materials and Methods: In n = 224 patents, we calculated the total CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score manually and by an automated clinical decision support system. We compared the automated clinical decision support system with manually calculation by physicians. Results: The interclass correlation between the automated clinical decision support system and manual calculation showed was 0.859 (0.611 and 0.931 95%-CI). Bland-Altman plot and linear regression analysis shows us a bias of −0.79 with limit of agreement (95%-CI) between 1.37 and −2.95 of the mean between our 2 measurements. The Cohen’s kappa was 0.42. Retrospective analysis showed more human errors than algorithmic errors. Time it took to calculate the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score was 11 s per patient in the automated clinical decision support system compared to 48 s per patient with the physician. Conclusions: Our automated clinical decision support system is at least as good as manual calculation, may be more accurate and is more time efficient. MDPI 2022-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9500878/ /pubmed/36143945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58091269 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
van Giersbergen, Chantal
Korsten, Hendrikus H. M.
De Bie Dekker, Ashley. J. R.
Mestrom, Eveline H. J.
Bouwman, R. Arthur
Quality Improvement in the Preoperative Evaluation: Accuracy of an Automated Clinical Decision Support System to Calculate CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc Scores
title Quality Improvement in the Preoperative Evaluation: Accuracy of an Automated Clinical Decision Support System to Calculate CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc Scores
title_full Quality Improvement in the Preoperative Evaluation: Accuracy of an Automated Clinical Decision Support System to Calculate CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc Scores
title_fullStr Quality Improvement in the Preoperative Evaluation: Accuracy of an Automated Clinical Decision Support System to Calculate CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc Scores
title_full_unstemmed Quality Improvement in the Preoperative Evaluation: Accuracy of an Automated Clinical Decision Support System to Calculate CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc Scores
title_short Quality Improvement in the Preoperative Evaluation: Accuracy of an Automated Clinical Decision Support System to Calculate CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc Scores
title_sort quality improvement in the preoperative evaluation: accuracy of an automated clinical decision support system to calculate cha(2)ds(2)-vasc scores
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9500878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143945
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58091269
work_keys_str_mv AT vangiersbergenchantal qualityimprovementinthepreoperativeevaluationaccuracyofanautomatedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemtocalculatecha2ds2vascscores
AT korstenhendrikushm qualityimprovementinthepreoperativeevaluationaccuracyofanautomatedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemtocalculatecha2ds2vascscores
AT debiedekkerashleyjr qualityimprovementinthepreoperativeevaluationaccuracyofanautomatedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemtocalculatecha2ds2vascscores
AT mestromevelinehj qualityimprovementinthepreoperativeevaluationaccuracyofanautomatedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemtocalculatecha2ds2vascscores
AT bouwmanrarthur qualityimprovementinthepreoperativeevaluationaccuracyofanautomatedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemtocalculatecha2ds2vascscores