Cargando…
Anatomical Characteristics of the Accessory Maxillary Ostium in Three-Dimensional Analysis
Background and Objectives: The accessory maxillary ostium (AMO) can interfere with ventilation and drainage of the maxillary sinus, and therefore the importance of evaluating the anatomical features of the AMO has been emphasized. This study aimed to evaluate anatomical characteristics of the AMO to...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9501023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143920 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58091243 |
Sumario: | Background and Objectives: The accessory maxillary ostium (AMO) can interfere with ventilation and drainage of the maxillary sinus, and therefore the importance of evaluating the anatomical features of the AMO has been emphasized. This study aimed to evaluate anatomical characteristics of the AMO together with the natural ostium (NO) using three-dimensional (3D) analysis and to assess the relationship between the AMO and maxillary sinus pathologies. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 394 sinuses in 197 patients. Using 3D computed tomography images, the prevalence of the AMO and concurrent sinus pathologies were examined. For patients with an AMO, 3D spatial positions of the AMO and NO related to adjacent anatomic structures and dimensions of the AMO and NO were evaluated. Results: A total of 84 sinuses showed single or multiple AMO, with a prevalence of 21.3%. The AMO was located superiorly by 30.1 mm from the maxillary sinus floor, inferiorly by 1.3 mm from the orbital floor, and posteriorly by 22.4 mm from the anterior sinus wall. The AMO was located 5.4 mm posteriorly and 0.7 mm inferiorly from the NO. On the same coronal plane as the NO or AMO, height from the maxillary sinus floor to the NO and AMO ranged from 19.4 to 45.8 mm and 14.5 mm to 41.9 mm, respectively. The mean horizontal and vertical dimensions were 5.9 mm and 4.6 mm for the NO and 2.8 mm and 3.0 mm for the AMO. We detected a significant association between the presence of the AMO and the mucosal thickening (p = 0.029). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that, although the AMO and NO are mostly located in positions that do not limit sinus-related surgeries, such as maxillary sinus floor augmentation, the AMO and NO are also found in lower positions, which may be a detriment to the postoperative physiological function of the maxillary sinus and affect treatment outcomes. |
---|