Cargando…

Clinical Efficacy of Catheter Ablation in the Treatment of Vasovagal Syncope

Catheter ablation of ganglionated plexi (GPs) performed as cardioneuroablation in the left atrium (LA) has been reported previously as a treatment for vasovagal syncope (VVS). However, the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in the treatment of VVS remains unclear. The objective of this study i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Lingping, Zhao, Yixin, Duan, Yichao, Wang, Rui, Hou, Junlong, Wang, Jing, Chen, Bin, Yang, Ye, Xue, Xianjun, Zhao, Yongyong, Zhang, Bo, Sun, Chaofeng, Guo, Fengwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9501086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143017
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185371
_version_ 1784795387189526528
author Xu, Lingping
Zhao, Yixin
Duan, Yichao
Wang, Rui
Hou, Junlong
Wang, Jing
Chen, Bin
Yang, Ye
Xue, Xianjun
Zhao, Yongyong
Zhang, Bo
Sun, Chaofeng
Guo, Fengwei
author_facet Xu, Lingping
Zhao, Yixin
Duan, Yichao
Wang, Rui
Hou, Junlong
Wang, Jing
Chen, Bin
Yang, Ye
Xue, Xianjun
Zhao, Yongyong
Zhang, Bo
Sun, Chaofeng
Guo, Fengwei
author_sort Xu, Lingping
collection PubMed
description Catheter ablation of ganglionated plexi (GPs) performed as cardioneuroablation in the left atrium (LA) has been reported previously as a treatment for vasovagal syncope (VVS). However, the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in the treatment of VVS remains unclear. The objective of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in the treatment of VVS and to compare the different ganglion-mapping methods for prognostic effects. A total of 108 patients with refractory VVS who underwent catheter ablation were retrospectively enrolled. Patients preferred to use high-frequency stimulation (HFS) (n = 66), and anatomic landmark (n = 42) targeting is used when HFS failed to induce a positive reaction. The efficacy of the treatment is evaluated by comparing the location and probability of the intraoperative vagal reflex, the remission rate of postoperative syncope symptoms, and the rate of negative head-up tilt (HUT) results. Adverse events are analyzed, and safety is evaluated. After follow-up for 8 (5, 15) months, both HFS mapping and anatomical ablation can effectively improve the syncope symptoms in VVS patients, and 83.7% of patients no longer experienced syncope (<0.001). Both approaches to catheter ablation in the treatment of VVS effectively inhibit the recurrence of VVS; they are safe and effective. Therefore, catheter ablation can be used as a treatment option for patients with symptomatic VVS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9501086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95010862022-09-24 Clinical Efficacy of Catheter Ablation in the Treatment of Vasovagal Syncope Xu, Lingping Zhao, Yixin Duan, Yichao Wang, Rui Hou, Junlong Wang, Jing Chen, Bin Yang, Ye Xue, Xianjun Zhao, Yongyong Zhang, Bo Sun, Chaofeng Guo, Fengwei J Clin Med Article Catheter ablation of ganglionated plexi (GPs) performed as cardioneuroablation in the left atrium (LA) has been reported previously as a treatment for vasovagal syncope (VVS). However, the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in the treatment of VVS remains unclear. The objective of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in the treatment of VVS and to compare the different ganglion-mapping methods for prognostic effects. A total of 108 patients with refractory VVS who underwent catheter ablation were retrospectively enrolled. Patients preferred to use high-frequency stimulation (HFS) (n = 66), and anatomic landmark (n = 42) targeting is used when HFS failed to induce a positive reaction. The efficacy of the treatment is evaluated by comparing the location and probability of the intraoperative vagal reflex, the remission rate of postoperative syncope symptoms, and the rate of negative head-up tilt (HUT) results. Adverse events are analyzed, and safety is evaluated. After follow-up for 8 (5, 15) months, both HFS mapping and anatomical ablation can effectively improve the syncope symptoms in VVS patients, and 83.7% of patients no longer experienced syncope (<0.001). Both approaches to catheter ablation in the treatment of VVS effectively inhibit the recurrence of VVS; they are safe and effective. Therefore, catheter ablation can be used as a treatment option for patients with symptomatic VVS. MDPI 2022-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9501086/ /pubmed/36143017 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185371 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Xu, Lingping
Zhao, Yixin
Duan, Yichao
Wang, Rui
Hou, Junlong
Wang, Jing
Chen, Bin
Yang, Ye
Xue, Xianjun
Zhao, Yongyong
Zhang, Bo
Sun, Chaofeng
Guo, Fengwei
Clinical Efficacy of Catheter Ablation in the Treatment of Vasovagal Syncope
title Clinical Efficacy of Catheter Ablation in the Treatment of Vasovagal Syncope
title_full Clinical Efficacy of Catheter Ablation in the Treatment of Vasovagal Syncope
title_fullStr Clinical Efficacy of Catheter Ablation in the Treatment of Vasovagal Syncope
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Efficacy of Catheter Ablation in the Treatment of Vasovagal Syncope
title_short Clinical Efficacy of Catheter Ablation in the Treatment of Vasovagal Syncope
title_sort clinical efficacy of catheter ablation in the treatment of vasovagal syncope
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9501086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143017
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185371
work_keys_str_mv AT xulingping clinicalefficacyofcatheterablationinthetreatmentofvasovagalsyncope
AT zhaoyixin clinicalefficacyofcatheterablationinthetreatmentofvasovagalsyncope
AT duanyichao clinicalefficacyofcatheterablationinthetreatmentofvasovagalsyncope
AT wangrui clinicalefficacyofcatheterablationinthetreatmentofvasovagalsyncope
AT houjunlong clinicalefficacyofcatheterablationinthetreatmentofvasovagalsyncope
AT wangjing clinicalefficacyofcatheterablationinthetreatmentofvasovagalsyncope
AT chenbin clinicalefficacyofcatheterablationinthetreatmentofvasovagalsyncope
AT yangye clinicalefficacyofcatheterablationinthetreatmentofvasovagalsyncope
AT xuexianjun clinicalefficacyofcatheterablationinthetreatmentofvasovagalsyncope
AT zhaoyongyong clinicalefficacyofcatheterablationinthetreatmentofvasovagalsyncope
AT zhangbo clinicalefficacyofcatheterablationinthetreatmentofvasovagalsyncope
AT sunchaofeng clinicalefficacyofcatheterablationinthetreatmentofvasovagalsyncope
AT guofengwei clinicalefficacyofcatheterablationinthetreatmentofvasovagalsyncope