Cargando…

Recognition of Studied Words in Perceptual Disfluent Sans Forgetica Font

The new Sans Forgetica (SF) typeface creates perceptual disfluency by breaking up parts of letters vertically, horizontally, or diagonally, thereby fragmentizing them. While patterns of fragmentization are consistent for each unique letter, they are not uniform across letters. With Gestalt principle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cui, Lucy, Liu, Jereth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9501108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36136745
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision6030052
_version_ 1784795392632684544
author Cui, Lucy
Liu, Jereth
author_facet Cui, Lucy
Liu, Jereth
author_sort Cui, Lucy
collection PubMed
description The new Sans Forgetica (SF) typeface creates perceptual disfluency by breaking up parts of letters vertically, horizontally, or diagonally, thereby fragmentizing them. While patterns of fragmentization are consistent for each unique letter, they are not uniform across letters. With Gestalt principles such as good continuation and perceptual completion being more difficult to implement in these settings, viewers may need to depend on context clues to identify words. This may be a desirable difficulty and improve memory for those words. Here, we investigate whether SF improves recognition of studied words. In Experiment 1, participants studied words in Arial and SF and completed old-new recognition tests where words retained their study fonts. In Experiment 2, we investigated the potential for context reinstatement—testing studied words in their studied fonts or the other font. Hit rate and discrimination sensitivities (d’) were analyzed for both experiments. Participants had significantly better recognition (hit rate) in SF than in Arial (Exp 1) and significantly higher discrimination sensitivities (d’) when words were tested in SF than in Arial (Exp 2). However, further examination of these results (e.g., marginally more response bias with SF than with Arial in Exp 1) lead us to hold reservations for the benefit of SF on word memory and conjecture that SF, at best, plays a limited role in improving recognition of studied words.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9501108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95011082022-09-24 Recognition of Studied Words in Perceptual Disfluent Sans Forgetica Font Cui, Lucy Liu, Jereth Vision (Basel) Article The new Sans Forgetica (SF) typeface creates perceptual disfluency by breaking up parts of letters vertically, horizontally, or diagonally, thereby fragmentizing them. While patterns of fragmentization are consistent for each unique letter, they are not uniform across letters. With Gestalt principles such as good continuation and perceptual completion being more difficult to implement in these settings, viewers may need to depend on context clues to identify words. This may be a desirable difficulty and improve memory for those words. Here, we investigate whether SF improves recognition of studied words. In Experiment 1, participants studied words in Arial and SF and completed old-new recognition tests where words retained their study fonts. In Experiment 2, we investigated the potential for context reinstatement—testing studied words in their studied fonts or the other font. Hit rate and discrimination sensitivities (d’) were analyzed for both experiments. Participants had significantly better recognition (hit rate) in SF than in Arial (Exp 1) and significantly higher discrimination sensitivities (d’) when words were tested in SF than in Arial (Exp 2). However, further examination of these results (e.g., marginally more response bias with SF than with Arial in Exp 1) lead us to hold reservations for the benefit of SF on word memory and conjecture that SF, at best, plays a limited role in improving recognition of studied words. MDPI 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9501108/ /pubmed/36136745 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision6030052 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cui, Lucy
Liu, Jereth
Recognition of Studied Words in Perceptual Disfluent Sans Forgetica Font
title Recognition of Studied Words in Perceptual Disfluent Sans Forgetica Font
title_full Recognition of Studied Words in Perceptual Disfluent Sans Forgetica Font
title_fullStr Recognition of Studied Words in Perceptual Disfluent Sans Forgetica Font
title_full_unstemmed Recognition of Studied Words in Perceptual Disfluent Sans Forgetica Font
title_short Recognition of Studied Words in Perceptual Disfluent Sans Forgetica Font
title_sort recognition of studied words in perceptual disfluent sans forgetica font
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9501108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36136745
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision6030052
work_keys_str_mv AT cuilucy recognitionofstudiedwordsinperceptualdisfluentsansforgeticafont
AT liujereth recognitionofstudiedwordsinperceptualdisfluentsansforgeticafont