Cargando…
Recognition of Studied Words in Perceptual Disfluent Sans Forgetica Font
The new Sans Forgetica (SF) typeface creates perceptual disfluency by breaking up parts of letters vertically, horizontally, or diagonally, thereby fragmentizing them. While patterns of fragmentization are consistent for each unique letter, they are not uniform across letters. With Gestalt principle...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9501108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36136745 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision6030052 |
_version_ | 1784795392632684544 |
---|---|
author | Cui, Lucy Liu, Jereth |
author_facet | Cui, Lucy Liu, Jereth |
author_sort | Cui, Lucy |
collection | PubMed |
description | The new Sans Forgetica (SF) typeface creates perceptual disfluency by breaking up parts of letters vertically, horizontally, or diagonally, thereby fragmentizing them. While patterns of fragmentization are consistent for each unique letter, they are not uniform across letters. With Gestalt principles such as good continuation and perceptual completion being more difficult to implement in these settings, viewers may need to depend on context clues to identify words. This may be a desirable difficulty and improve memory for those words. Here, we investigate whether SF improves recognition of studied words. In Experiment 1, participants studied words in Arial and SF and completed old-new recognition tests where words retained their study fonts. In Experiment 2, we investigated the potential for context reinstatement—testing studied words in their studied fonts or the other font. Hit rate and discrimination sensitivities (d’) were analyzed for both experiments. Participants had significantly better recognition (hit rate) in SF than in Arial (Exp 1) and significantly higher discrimination sensitivities (d’) when words were tested in SF than in Arial (Exp 2). However, further examination of these results (e.g., marginally more response bias with SF than with Arial in Exp 1) lead us to hold reservations for the benefit of SF on word memory and conjecture that SF, at best, plays a limited role in improving recognition of studied words. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9501108 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95011082022-09-24 Recognition of Studied Words in Perceptual Disfluent Sans Forgetica Font Cui, Lucy Liu, Jereth Vision (Basel) Article The new Sans Forgetica (SF) typeface creates perceptual disfluency by breaking up parts of letters vertically, horizontally, or diagonally, thereby fragmentizing them. While patterns of fragmentization are consistent for each unique letter, they are not uniform across letters. With Gestalt principles such as good continuation and perceptual completion being more difficult to implement in these settings, viewers may need to depend on context clues to identify words. This may be a desirable difficulty and improve memory for those words. Here, we investigate whether SF improves recognition of studied words. In Experiment 1, participants studied words in Arial and SF and completed old-new recognition tests where words retained their study fonts. In Experiment 2, we investigated the potential for context reinstatement—testing studied words in their studied fonts or the other font. Hit rate and discrimination sensitivities (d’) were analyzed for both experiments. Participants had significantly better recognition (hit rate) in SF than in Arial (Exp 1) and significantly higher discrimination sensitivities (d’) when words were tested in SF than in Arial (Exp 2). However, further examination of these results (e.g., marginally more response bias with SF than with Arial in Exp 1) lead us to hold reservations for the benefit of SF on word memory and conjecture that SF, at best, plays a limited role in improving recognition of studied words. MDPI 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9501108/ /pubmed/36136745 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision6030052 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Cui, Lucy Liu, Jereth Recognition of Studied Words in Perceptual Disfluent Sans Forgetica Font |
title | Recognition of Studied Words in Perceptual Disfluent Sans Forgetica Font |
title_full | Recognition of Studied Words in Perceptual Disfluent Sans Forgetica Font |
title_fullStr | Recognition of Studied Words in Perceptual Disfluent Sans Forgetica Font |
title_full_unstemmed | Recognition of Studied Words in Perceptual Disfluent Sans Forgetica Font |
title_short | Recognition of Studied Words in Perceptual Disfluent Sans Forgetica Font |
title_sort | recognition of studied words in perceptual disfluent sans forgetica font |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9501108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36136745 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision6030052 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cuilucy recognitionofstudiedwordsinperceptualdisfluentsansforgeticafont AT liujereth recognitionofstudiedwordsinperceptualdisfluentsansforgeticafont |