Cargando…

CO(2) Is Beneficial to Gut Microbiota Homeostasis during Colonoscopy: Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Many studies have reported minor complications and disturbance of the gut microbiota after colonoscopy. Compared with air, carbon dioxide (CO(2)) insufflation could decrease minor complications, but its impact on gut microbiota remains unknown. Methods: Thirty-eight healthy subjects were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Xue, Xiu, Wen-Bo, Wang, Jin-Xia, Li, Liang-Ping, He, Chong, Gao, Cai-Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9501605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36142931
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185281
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Many studies have reported minor complications and disturbance of the gut microbiota after colonoscopy. Compared with air, carbon dioxide (CO(2)) insufflation could decrease minor complications, but its impact on gut microbiota remains unknown. Methods: Thirty-eight healthy subjects were assessed and twenty were randomized to receive either CO(2) or air insufflation during colonoscopy. Neither the participants nor the staff involved in the follow-up knew which gas was used. Minor complications were assessed using symptom scores. Fecal samples were collected at eight time-points for microbiome analysis by full-length 16S rRNA gene amplicon analysis. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. The recovery of minor complications after colonoscopy was faster in the CO(2) group (the day of the colonoscopy) than in the air group (the day after the colonoscopy). There was no significant reduction in alpha diversity (species richness) of the first stool after colonoscopy in the CO(2) group (115.0 ± 32.81 vs. 97.4 ± 42.31, p = 0.28) compared with the air group (123.8 ± 37.25 vs. 84.8 ± 31.67, p = 0.04). However, there were no differences in beta diversity between the groups. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis indicated that anaerobic probiotics such as Bacteroides caccae, Bacteroides finegoldii and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron were more abundant in the CO(2) group than in the air group within 14 days after colonoscopy. On the contrary, the content of Escherichia coli, Ruminococcus torques and Ruminococcus guavus was higher in the air group. Conclusions: CO(2) is beneficial to gut microbiota homeostasis during colonoscopy in healthy subjects. The effects in patients with different diseases need to be further studied.