Cargando…

COVID-19 therapies for inpatients: a review and quality assessment of clinical guidelines

Owing to condensed development processes, expanding evidence and differences in healthcare system characteristics, many COVID-19 guidelines differ in their quality and treatment recommendations, which has consequences for clinical practice. This review aimed to identify COVID-19 treatment guidelines...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wohl, David A., Espinueva, Aprille A., Dau, Lauren, Wang, Chen-Yu, Lachmann, Alexandra, Bam, Rujuta A., Rawal, Aaditya, Chappell-Smith, Kerris, Rockstroh, Juergen K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Respiratory Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9501649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36411792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00236-2022
Descripción
Sumario:Owing to condensed development processes, expanding evidence and differences in healthcare system characteristics, many COVID-19 guidelines differ in their quality and treatment recommendations, which has consequences for clinical practice. This review aimed to identify COVID-19 treatment guidelines, assess their quality and summarise their recommendations. Guidelines were identified for five therapies most commonly used among inpatients with COVID-19 (remdesivir, dexamethasone, tocilizumab, baricitinib and casirivimab/imdevimab) from 11 countries. Guideline quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE-II) tool. Full details of recommendations and supporting evidence were analysed for high-quality guidelines, defined as those scoring ≥50% in Domain 3 (Rigour of Development) of AGREE-II. Overall, guidelines differed substantially in their quality and, even among high-quality guidelines using the same evidence, recommendations regarding specific therapeutics varied. Potential reasons for this heterogeneity, including the availability and consistency of clinical data, visibility of trial end-points and context-specific factors, are discussed.