Cargando…
COVID-19 therapies for inpatients: a review and quality assessment of clinical guidelines
Owing to condensed development processes, expanding evidence and differences in healthcare system characteristics, many COVID-19 guidelines differ in their quality and treatment recommendations, which has consequences for clinical practice. This review aimed to identify COVID-19 treatment guidelines...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Respiratory Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9501649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36411792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00236-2022 |
_version_ | 1784795526443565056 |
---|---|
author | Wohl, David A. Espinueva, Aprille A. Dau, Lauren Wang, Chen-Yu Lachmann, Alexandra Bam, Rujuta A. Rawal, Aaditya Chappell-Smith, Kerris Rockstroh, Juergen K. |
author_facet | Wohl, David A. Espinueva, Aprille A. Dau, Lauren Wang, Chen-Yu Lachmann, Alexandra Bam, Rujuta A. Rawal, Aaditya Chappell-Smith, Kerris Rockstroh, Juergen K. |
author_sort | Wohl, David A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Owing to condensed development processes, expanding evidence and differences in healthcare system characteristics, many COVID-19 guidelines differ in their quality and treatment recommendations, which has consequences for clinical practice. This review aimed to identify COVID-19 treatment guidelines, assess their quality and summarise their recommendations. Guidelines were identified for five therapies most commonly used among inpatients with COVID-19 (remdesivir, dexamethasone, tocilizumab, baricitinib and casirivimab/imdevimab) from 11 countries. Guideline quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE-II) tool. Full details of recommendations and supporting evidence were analysed for high-quality guidelines, defined as those scoring ≥50% in Domain 3 (Rigour of Development) of AGREE-II. Overall, guidelines differed substantially in their quality and, even among high-quality guidelines using the same evidence, recommendations regarding specific therapeutics varied. Potential reasons for this heterogeneity, including the availability and consistency of clinical data, visibility of trial end-points and context-specific factors, are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9501649 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | European Respiratory Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95016492022-09-26 COVID-19 therapies for inpatients: a review and quality assessment of clinical guidelines Wohl, David A. Espinueva, Aprille A. Dau, Lauren Wang, Chen-Yu Lachmann, Alexandra Bam, Rujuta A. Rawal, Aaditya Chappell-Smith, Kerris Rockstroh, Juergen K. ERJ Open Res Reviews Owing to condensed development processes, expanding evidence and differences in healthcare system characteristics, many COVID-19 guidelines differ in their quality and treatment recommendations, which has consequences for clinical practice. This review aimed to identify COVID-19 treatment guidelines, assess their quality and summarise their recommendations. Guidelines were identified for five therapies most commonly used among inpatients with COVID-19 (remdesivir, dexamethasone, tocilizumab, baricitinib and casirivimab/imdevimab) from 11 countries. Guideline quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE-II) tool. Full details of recommendations and supporting evidence were analysed for high-quality guidelines, defined as those scoring ≥50% in Domain 3 (Rigour of Development) of AGREE-II. Overall, guidelines differed substantially in their quality and, even among high-quality guidelines using the same evidence, recommendations regarding specific therapeutics varied. Potential reasons for this heterogeneity, including the availability and consistency of clinical data, visibility of trial end-points and context-specific factors, are discussed. European Respiratory Society 2022-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9501649/ /pubmed/36411792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00236-2022 Text en Copyright ©The authors 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org (mailto:permissions@ersnet.org) |
spellingShingle | Reviews Wohl, David A. Espinueva, Aprille A. Dau, Lauren Wang, Chen-Yu Lachmann, Alexandra Bam, Rujuta A. Rawal, Aaditya Chappell-Smith, Kerris Rockstroh, Juergen K. COVID-19 therapies for inpatients: a review and quality assessment of clinical guidelines |
title | COVID-19 therapies for inpatients: a review and quality assessment of clinical guidelines |
title_full | COVID-19 therapies for inpatients: a review and quality assessment of clinical guidelines |
title_fullStr | COVID-19 therapies for inpatients: a review and quality assessment of clinical guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | COVID-19 therapies for inpatients: a review and quality assessment of clinical guidelines |
title_short | COVID-19 therapies for inpatients: a review and quality assessment of clinical guidelines |
title_sort | covid-19 therapies for inpatients: a review and quality assessment of clinical guidelines |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9501649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36411792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00236-2022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wohldavida covid19therapiesforinpatientsareviewandqualityassessmentofclinicalguidelines AT espinuevaaprillea covid19therapiesforinpatientsareviewandqualityassessmentofclinicalguidelines AT daulauren covid19therapiesforinpatientsareviewandqualityassessmentofclinicalguidelines AT wangchenyu covid19therapiesforinpatientsareviewandqualityassessmentofclinicalguidelines AT lachmannalexandra covid19therapiesforinpatientsareviewandqualityassessmentofclinicalguidelines AT bamrujutaa covid19therapiesforinpatientsareviewandqualityassessmentofclinicalguidelines AT rawalaaditya covid19therapiesforinpatientsareviewandqualityassessmentofclinicalguidelines AT chappellsmithkerris covid19therapiesforinpatientsareviewandqualityassessmentofclinicalguidelines AT rockstrohjuergenk covid19therapiesforinpatientsareviewandqualityassessmentofclinicalguidelines |