Cargando…

Development of Principles for Health-Related Information on Social Media: Delphi Study

BACKGROUND: Health-related misinformation can be propagated via social media and is a threat to public health. Several quality assessment tools and principles to evaluate health-related information in the public domain exist; however, these were not designed specifically for social media. OBJECTIVE:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Denniss, Emily, Lindberg, Rebecca, McNaughton, Sarah A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9501680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36074544
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/37337
_version_ 1784795533195345920
author Denniss, Emily
Lindberg, Rebecca
McNaughton, Sarah A
author_facet Denniss, Emily
Lindberg, Rebecca
McNaughton, Sarah A
author_sort Denniss, Emily
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health-related misinformation can be propagated via social media and is a threat to public health. Several quality assessment tools and principles to evaluate health-related information in the public domain exist; however, these were not designed specifically for social media. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop Principles for Health-related Information on Social Media (PRHISM), which can be used to evaluate the quality of health-related social media content. METHODS: A modified Delphi approach was used to obtain expert consensus on the principles and functions of PRHISM. Health and social media experts were recruited via Twitter, email, and snowballing. A total of 3 surveys were administered between February 2021 and May 2021. The first survey was informed by a literature review and included open-ended questions and items from existing quality assessment tools. Subsequent surveys were informed by the results of the proceeding survey. Consensus was deemed if ≥80% agreement was reached, and items with consensus were considered relevant to include in PRHISM. After the third survey, principles were finalized, and an instruction manual and scoring tool for PRHISM were developed and circulated to expert participants for final feedback. RESULTS: A total of 34 experts consented to participate, of whom 18 (53%) responded to all 3 Delphi surveys. In total, 13 principles were considered relevant and were included in PRHISM. When the instructions and PRHISM scoring tool were circulated, no objections to the wording of the final principles were received. CONCLUSIONS: A total of 13 quality principles were included in the PRHISM tool, along with a scoring system and implementation tool. The principles promote accessibility, transparency, provision of authoritative and evidence-based information and support for consumers’ relationships with health care providers. PRHISM can be used to evaluate the quality of health-related information provided on social media. These principles may also be useful to content creators for developing high-quality health-related social media content and assist consumers in discerning high- and low-quality information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9501680
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95016802022-09-24 Development of Principles for Health-Related Information on Social Media: Delphi Study Denniss, Emily Lindberg, Rebecca McNaughton, Sarah A J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Health-related misinformation can be propagated via social media and is a threat to public health. Several quality assessment tools and principles to evaluate health-related information in the public domain exist; however, these were not designed specifically for social media. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop Principles for Health-related Information on Social Media (PRHISM), which can be used to evaluate the quality of health-related social media content. METHODS: A modified Delphi approach was used to obtain expert consensus on the principles and functions of PRHISM. Health and social media experts were recruited via Twitter, email, and snowballing. A total of 3 surveys were administered between February 2021 and May 2021. The first survey was informed by a literature review and included open-ended questions and items from existing quality assessment tools. Subsequent surveys were informed by the results of the proceeding survey. Consensus was deemed if ≥80% agreement was reached, and items with consensus were considered relevant to include in PRHISM. After the third survey, principles were finalized, and an instruction manual and scoring tool for PRHISM were developed and circulated to expert participants for final feedback. RESULTS: A total of 34 experts consented to participate, of whom 18 (53%) responded to all 3 Delphi surveys. In total, 13 principles were considered relevant and were included in PRHISM. When the instructions and PRHISM scoring tool were circulated, no objections to the wording of the final principles were received. CONCLUSIONS: A total of 13 quality principles were included in the PRHISM tool, along with a scoring system and implementation tool. The principles promote accessibility, transparency, provision of authoritative and evidence-based information and support for consumers’ relationships with health care providers. PRHISM can be used to evaluate the quality of health-related information provided on social media. These principles may also be useful to content creators for developing high-quality health-related social media content and assist consumers in discerning high- and low-quality information. JMIR Publications 2022-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9501680/ /pubmed/36074544 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/37337 Text en ©Emily Denniss, Rebecca Lindberg, Sarah A McNaughton. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 08.09.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Denniss, Emily
Lindberg, Rebecca
McNaughton, Sarah A
Development of Principles for Health-Related Information on Social Media: Delphi Study
title Development of Principles for Health-Related Information on Social Media: Delphi Study
title_full Development of Principles for Health-Related Information on Social Media: Delphi Study
title_fullStr Development of Principles for Health-Related Information on Social Media: Delphi Study
title_full_unstemmed Development of Principles for Health-Related Information on Social Media: Delphi Study
title_short Development of Principles for Health-Related Information on Social Media: Delphi Study
title_sort development of principles for health-related information on social media: delphi study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9501680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36074544
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/37337
work_keys_str_mv AT dennissemily developmentofprinciplesforhealthrelatedinformationonsocialmediadelphistudy
AT lindbergrebecca developmentofprinciplesforhealthrelatedinformationonsocialmediadelphistudy
AT mcnaughtonsaraha developmentofprinciplesforhealthrelatedinformationonsocialmediadelphistudy