Cargando…

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Can Predict Therapy Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization

AIM: The goal of this meta-analysis was to assess the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) as a pre- and posttreatment (ADC value changes [ΔADC]) predictive imaging biomarker of response to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Scop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drewes, Ralph, Heinze, Constanze, Pech, Maciej, Powerski, Maciej, Woidacki, Katja, Wienke, Andreas, Surov, Alexey, Omari, Jazan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9501788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34749359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000520716
_version_ 1784795553874313216
author Drewes, Ralph
Heinze, Constanze
Pech, Maciej
Powerski, Maciej
Woidacki, Katja
Wienke, Andreas
Surov, Alexey
Omari, Jazan
author_facet Drewes, Ralph
Heinze, Constanze
Pech, Maciej
Powerski, Maciej
Woidacki, Katja
Wienke, Andreas
Surov, Alexey
Omari, Jazan
author_sort Drewes, Ralph
collection PubMed
description AIM: The goal of this meta-analysis was to assess the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) as a pre- and posttreatment (ADC value changes [ΔADC]) predictive imaging biomarker of response to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Scopus database, Embase database, and MEDLINE library were scanned for connections between pre- and posttreatment ADC values of HCC and response to TACE. Six studies qualified for inclusion. The following parameters were collected: authors, publication year, study design, number of patients, drugs for TACE, mean ADC value, standard deviation, measure method, b values, and Tesla strength. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Studies 2 instrument was employed to check the methodological quality of each study. The meta-analysis was performed by utilizing RevMan 5.3 software. DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models with inverse-variance were used to regard heterogeneity. The mean ADC values and 95% confidence intervals were computed. RESULTS: Six studies (n = 271 patients with 293 HCC nodules) were included. The pretreatment mean ADC in the responder group was 1.20 × 10<sup>−3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s (0.98, 1.42) and 1.14 × 10<sup>−3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s (0.89, 1.39) in the nonresponder group. The analysis of post-TACE ΔADC revealed a threshold of ≥20% to identify treatment responders. No suitable pretreatment ADC threshold to predict therapy response or discriminate between responders and nonresponders before therapy could be discovered. CONCLUSION: ΔADC can facilitate early objective response evaluation through post-therapeutic ADC alterations ≥20%. Pretreatment ADC cannot predict response to TACE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9501788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95017882022-09-24 Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Can Predict Therapy Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Drewes, Ralph Heinze, Constanze Pech, Maciej Powerski, Maciej Woidacki, Katja Wienke, Andreas Surov, Alexey Omari, Jazan Dig Dis Liver: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis AIM: The goal of this meta-analysis was to assess the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) as a pre- and posttreatment (ADC value changes [ΔADC]) predictive imaging biomarker of response to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Scopus database, Embase database, and MEDLINE library were scanned for connections between pre- and posttreatment ADC values of HCC and response to TACE. Six studies qualified for inclusion. The following parameters were collected: authors, publication year, study design, number of patients, drugs for TACE, mean ADC value, standard deviation, measure method, b values, and Tesla strength. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Studies 2 instrument was employed to check the methodological quality of each study. The meta-analysis was performed by utilizing RevMan 5.3 software. DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models with inverse-variance were used to regard heterogeneity. The mean ADC values and 95% confidence intervals were computed. RESULTS: Six studies (n = 271 patients with 293 HCC nodules) were included. The pretreatment mean ADC in the responder group was 1.20 × 10<sup>−3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s (0.98, 1.42) and 1.14 × 10<sup>−3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s (0.89, 1.39) in the nonresponder group. The analysis of post-TACE ΔADC revealed a threshold of ≥20% to identify treatment responders. No suitable pretreatment ADC threshold to predict therapy response or discriminate between responders and nonresponders before therapy could be discovered. CONCLUSION: ΔADC can facilitate early objective response evaluation through post-therapeutic ADC alterations ≥20%. Pretreatment ADC cannot predict response to TACE. S. Karger AG 2022-09 2021-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9501788/ /pubmed/34749359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000520716 Text en Copyright © 2021 by The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY). Usage, derivative works and distribution are permitted provided that proper credit is given to the author and the original publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
spellingShingle Liver: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Drewes, Ralph
Heinze, Constanze
Pech, Maciej
Powerski, Maciej
Woidacki, Katja
Wienke, Andreas
Surov, Alexey
Omari, Jazan
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Can Predict Therapy Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization
title Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Can Predict Therapy Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization
title_full Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Can Predict Therapy Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization
title_fullStr Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Can Predict Therapy Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization
title_full_unstemmed Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Can Predict Therapy Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization
title_short Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Can Predict Therapy Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization
title_sort apparent diffusion coefficient can predict therapy response of hepatocellular carcinoma to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization
topic Liver: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9501788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34749359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000520716
work_keys_str_mv AT drewesralph apparentdiffusioncoefficientcanpredicttherapyresponseofhepatocellularcarcinomatotranscatheterarterialchemoembolization
AT heinzeconstanze apparentdiffusioncoefficientcanpredicttherapyresponseofhepatocellularcarcinomatotranscatheterarterialchemoembolization
AT pechmaciej apparentdiffusioncoefficientcanpredicttherapyresponseofhepatocellularcarcinomatotranscatheterarterialchemoembolization
AT powerskimaciej apparentdiffusioncoefficientcanpredicttherapyresponseofhepatocellularcarcinomatotranscatheterarterialchemoembolization
AT woidackikatja apparentdiffusioncoefficientcanpredicttherapyresponseofhepatocellularcarcinomatotranscatheterarterialchemoembolization
AT wienkeandreas apparentdiffusioncoefficientcanpredicttherapyresponseofhepatocellularcarcinomatotranscatheterarterialchemoembolization
AT surovalexey apparentdiffusioncoefficientcanpredicttherapyresponseofhepatocellularcarcinomatotranscatheterarterialchemoembolization
AT omarijazan apparentdiffusioncoefficientcanpredicttherapyresponseofhepatocellularcarcinomatotranscatheterarterialchemoembolization