Cargando…

Interrelation of the CdTe Grain Size, Postgrowth Processing, and Window Layer Selection on Solar Cell Performance

[Image: see text] Recent improvements to the CdTe solar cell device structure have focused on replacing the CdS window layer with a more transparent material to reduce parasitic absorption and increase J(sc), as well as incorporating selenium into the absorber layer to achieve a graded band gap. How...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shalvey, Thomas P., Bagshaw, Heath, Major, Jonathan D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9501911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36084172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c07609
_version_ 1784795583234441216
author Shalvey, Thomas P.
Bagshaw, Heath
Major, Jonathan D.
author_facet Shalvey, Thomas P.
Bagshaw, Heath
Major, Jonathan D.
author_sort Shalvey, Thomas P.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Recent improvements to the CdTe solar cell device structure have focused on replacing the CdS window layer with a more transparent material to reduce parasitic absorption and increase J(sc), as well as incorporating selenium into the absorber layer to achieve a graded band gap. However, altering the CdTe device structure is nontrivial due to the interdependent nature of device processing steps. The choice of the window layer influences the grain structure of the CdTe layer, which in turn can affect the chloride treatment, which itself may contribute to intermixing between the window and absorber layers. This work studies three different device architectures in parallel, allowing for an in-depth comparison of processing conditions for CdTe solar cells grown on CdS, SnO(2), and CdSe. Direct replacement of the CdS window layer with a wider band gap SnO(2) layer is hindered by poor growth of the absorber, producing highly strained CdTe films and a weak junction. This is alleviated by inserting a CdSe layer between the SnO(2) and CdTe, which improves the growth of CdTe and results in a graded CdSe(x)Te(1–x) absorber layer. For each substrate, the CdTe deposition rate and postgrowth chloride treatment are systematically varied, highlighting the distinct processing requirements of each device structure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9501911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95019112022-09-24 Interrelation of the CdTe Grain Size, Postgrowth Processing, and Window Layer Selection on Solar Cell Performance Shalvey, Thomas P. Bagshaw, Heath Major, Jonathan D. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces [Image: see text] Recent improvements to the CdTe solar cell device structure have focused on replacing the CdS window layer with a more transparent material to reduce parasitic absorption and increase J(sc), as well as incorporating selenium into the absorber layer to achieve a graded band gap. However, altering the CdTe device structure is nontrivial due to the interdependent nature of device processing steps. The choice of the window layer influences the grain structure of the CdTe layer, which in turn can affect the chloride treatment, which itself may contribute to intermixing between the window and absorber layers. This work studies three different device architectures in parallel, allowing for an in-depth comparison of processing conditions for CdTe solar cells grown on CdS, SnO(2), and CdSe. Direct replacement of the CdS window layer with a wider band gap SnO(2) layer is hindered by poor growth of the absorber, producing highly strained CdTe films and a weak junction. This is alleviated by inserting a CdSe layer between the SnO(2) and CdTe, which improves the growth of CdTe and results in a graded CdSe(x)Te(1–x) absorber layer. For each substrate, the CdTe deposition rate and postgrowth chloride treatment are systematically varied, highlighting the distinct processing requirements of each device structure. American Chemical Society 2022-09-09 2022-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9501911/ /pubmed/36084172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c07609 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Shalvey, Thomas P.
Bagshaw, Heath
Major, Jonathan D.
Interrelation of the CdTe Grain Size, Postgrowth Processing, and Window Layer Selection on Solar Cell Performance
title Interrelation of the CdTe Grain Size, Postgrowth Processing, and Window Layer Selection on Solar Cell Performance
title_full Interrelation of the CdTe Grain Size, Postgrowth Processing, and Window Layer Selection on Solar Cell Performance
title_fullStr Interrelation of the CdTe Grain Size, Postgrowth Processing, and Window Layer Selection on Solar Cell Performance
title_full_unstemmed Interrelation of the CdTe Grain Size, Postgrowth Processing, and Window Layer Selection on Solar Cell Performance
title_short Interrelation of the CdTe Grain Size, Postgrowth Processing, and Window Layer Selection on Solar Cell Performance
title_sort interrelation of the cdte grain size, postgrowth processing, and window layer selection on solar cell performance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9501911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36084172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c07609
work_keys_str_mv AT shalveythomasp interrelationofthecdtegrainsizepostgrowthprocessingandwindowlayerselectiononsolarcellperformance
AT bagshawheath interrelationofthecdtegrainsizepostgrowthprocessingandwindowlayerselectiononsolarcellperformance
AT majorjonathand interrelationofthecdtegrainsizepostgrowthprocessingandwindowlayerselectiononsolarcellperformance