Cargando…
Interrelation of the CdTe Grain Size, Postgrowth Processing, and Window Layer Selection on Solar Cell Performance
[Image: see text] Recent improvements to the CdTe solar cell device structure have focused on replacing the CdS window layer with a more transparent material to reduce parasitic absorption and increase J(sc), as well as incorporating selenium into the absorber layer to achieve a graded band gap. How...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9501911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36084172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c07609 |
_version_ | 1784795583234441216 |
---|---|
author | Shalvey, Thomas P. Bagshaw, Heath Major, Jonathan D. |
author_facet | Shalvey, Thomas P. Bagshaw, Heath Major, Jonathan D. |
author_sort | Shalvey, Thomas P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Recent improvements to the CdTe solar cell device structure have focused on replacing the CdS window layer with a more transparent material to reduce parasitic absorption and increase J(sc), as well as incorporating selenium into the absorber layer to achieve a graded band gap. However, altering the CdTe device structure is nontrivial due to the interdependent nature of device processing steps. The choice of the window layer influences the grain structure of the CdTe layer, which in turn can affect the chloride treatment, which itself may contribute to intermixing between the window and absorber layers. This work studies three different device architectures in parallel, allowing for an in-depth comparison of processing conditions for CdTe solar cells grown on CdS, SnO(2), and CdSe. Direct replacement of the CdS window layer with a wider band gap SnO(2) layer is hindered by poor growth of the absorber, producing highly strained CdTe films and a weak junction. This is alleviated by inserting a CdSe layer between the SnO(2) and CdTe, which improves the growth of CdTe and results in a graded CdSe(x)Te(1–x) absorber layer. For each substrate, the CdTe deposition rate and postgrowth chloride treatment are systematically varied, highlighting the distinct processing requirements of each device structure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9501911 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95019112022-09-24 Interrelation of the CdTe Grain Size, Postgrowth Processing, and Window Layer Selection on Solar Cell Performance Shalvey, Thomas P. Bagshaw, Heath Major, Jonathan D. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces [Image: see text] Recent improvements to the CdTe solar cell device structure have focused on replacing the CdS window layer with a more transparent material to reduce parasitic absorption and increase J(sc), as well as incorporating selenium into the absorber layer to achieve a graded band gap. However, altering the CdTe device structure is nontrivial due to the interdependent nature of device processing steps. The choice of the window layer influences the grain structure of the CdTe layer, which in turn can affect the chloride treatment, which itself may contribute to intermixing between the window and absorber layers. This work studies three different device architectures in parallel, allowing for an in-depth comparison of processing conditions for CdTe solar cells grown on CdS, SnO(2), and CdSe. Direct replacement of the CdS window layer with a wider band gap SnO(2) layer is hindered by poor growth of the absorber, producing highly strained CdTe films and a weak junction. This is alleviated by inserting a CdSe layer between the SnO(2) and CdTe, which improves the growth of CdTe and results in a graded CdSe(x)Te(1–x) absorber layer. For each substrate, the CdTe deposition rate and postgrowth chloride treatment are systematically varied, highlighting the distinct processing requirements of each device structure. American Chemical Society 2022-09-09 2022-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9501911/ /pubmed/36084172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c07609 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Shalvey, Thomas P. Bagshaw, Heath Major, Jonathan D. Interrelation of the CdTe Grain Size, Postgrowth Processing, and Window Layer Selection on Solar Cell Performance |
title | Interrelation of
the CdTe Grain Size, Postgrowth Processing,
and Window Layer Selection on Solar Cell Performance |
title_full | Interrelation of
the CdTe Grain Size, Postgrowth Processing,
and Window Layer Selection on Solar Cell Performance |
title_fullStr | Interrelation of
the CdTe Grain Size, Postgrowth Processing,
and Window Layer Selection on Solar Cell Performance |
title_full_unstemmed | Interrelation of
the CdTe Grain Size, Postgrowth Processing,
and Window Layer Selection on Solar Cell Performance |
title_short | Interrelation of
the CdTe Grain Size, Postgrowth Processing,
and Window Layer Selection on Solar Cell Performance |
title_sort | interrelation of
the cdte grain size, postgrowth processing,
and window layer selection on solar cell performance |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9501911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36084172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c07609 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shalveythomasp interrelationofthecdtegrainsizepostgrowthprocessingandwindowlayerselectiononsolarcellperformance AT bagshawheath interrelationofthecdtegrainsizepostgrowthprocessingandwindowlayerselectiononsolarcellperformance AT majorjonathand interrelationofthecdtegrainsizepostgrowthprocessingandwindowlayerselectiononsolarcellperformance |