Cargando…

Financial Viability and Environmental Sustainability of Fecal Sludge Treatment with Pyrolysis Omni Processors

[Image: see text] Omni Processors (OPs) are community-scale systems for non-sewered fecal sludge treatment. These systems have demonstrated their capacity to treat excreta from tens of thousands of people using thermal treatment processes (e.g., pyrolysis), but their relative sustainability is uncle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rowles, Lewis Stetson, Morgan, Victoria L., Li, Yalin, Zhang, Xinyi, Watabe, Shion, Stephen, Tyler, Lohman, Hannah A. C., DeSouza, Derek, Hallowell, Jeff, Cusick, Roland D., Guest, Jeremy S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36164351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsenvironau.2c00022
_version_ 1784795608611028992
author Rowles, Lewis Stetson
Morgan, Victoria L.
Li, Yalin
Zhang, Xinyi
Watabe, Shion
Stephen, Tyler
Lohman, Hannah A. C.
DeSouza, Derek
Hallowell, Jeff
Cusick, Roland D.
Guest, Jeremy S.
author_facet Rowles, Lewis Stetson
Morgan, Victoria L.
Li, Yalin
Zhang, Xinyi
Watabe, Shion
Stephen, Tyler
Lohman, Hannah A. C.
DeSouza, Derek
Hallowell, Jeff
Cusick, Roland D.
Guest, Jeremy S.
author_sort Rowles, Lewis Stetson
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Omni Processors (OPs) are community-scale systems for non-sewered fecal sludge treatment. These systems have demonstrated their capacity to treat excreta from tens of thousands of people using thermal treatment processes (e.g., pyrolysis), but their relative sustainability is unclear. In this study, QSDsan (an open-source Python package) was used to characterize the financial viability and environmental implications of fecal sludge treatment via pyrolysis-based OP technology treating mixed and source-separated human excreta and to elucidate the key drivers of system sustainability. Overall, the daily per capita cost for the treatment of mixed excreta (pit latrines) via the OP was estimated to be 0.05 [0.03–0.08] USD·cap(–1)·d(–1), while the treatment of source-separated excreta (from urine-diverting dry toilets) was estimated to have a per capita cost of 0.09 [0.08–0.14] USD·cap(–1)·d(–1). Operation and maintenance of the OP is a critical driver of total per capita cost, whereas the contribution from capital cost of the OP is much lower because it is distributed over a relatively large number of users (i.e., 12,000 people) for the system lifetime (i.e., 20 yr). The total emissions from the source-separated scenario were estimated to be 11 [8.3–23] kg CO(2) eq·cap(–1)·yr(–1), compared to 49 [28–77] kg CO(2) eq·cap(–1)·yr(–1) for mixed excreta. Both scenarios fall below the estimates of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for anaerobic treatment of fecal sludge collected from pit latrines. Source-separation also creates opportunities for resource recovery to offset costs through nutrient recovery and carbon sequestration with biochar production. For example, when carbon is valued at 150 USD·Mg(–1) of CO(2), the per capita cost of sanitation can be further reduced by 44 and 40% for the source-separated and mixed excreta scenarios, respectively. Overall, our results demonstrate that pyrolysis-based OP technology can provide low-cost, low-GHG fecal sludge treatment while reducing global sanitation gaps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9502014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95020142022-09-24 Financial Viability and Environmental Sustainability of Fecal Sludge Treatment with Pyrolysis Omni Processors Rowles, Lewis Stetson Morgan, Victoria L. Li, Yalin Zhang, Xinyi Watabe, Shion Stephen, Tyler Lohman, Hannah A. C. DeSouza, Derek Hallowell, Jeff Cusick, Roland D. Guest, Jeremy S. ACS Environ Au [Image: see text] Omni Processors (OPs) are community-scale systems for non-sewered fecal sludge treatment. These systems have demonstrated their capacity to treat excreta from tens of thousands of people using thermal treatment processes (e.g., pyrolysis), but their relative sustainability is unclear. In this study, QSDsan (an open-source Python package) was used to characterize the financial viability and environmental implications of fecal sludge treatment via pyrolysis-based OP technology treating mixed and source-separated human excreta and to elucidate the key drivers of system sustainability. Overall, the daily per capita cost for the treatment of mixed excreta (pit latrines) via the OP was estimated to be 0.05 [0.03–0.08] USD·cap(–1)·d(–1), while the treatment of source-separated excreta (from urine-diverting dry toilets) was estimated to have a per capita cost of 0.09 [0.08–0.14] USD·cap(–1)·d(–1). Operation and maintenance of the OP is a critical driver of total per capita cost, whereas the contribution from capital cost of the OP is much lower because it is distributed over a relatively large number of users (i.e., 12,000 people) for the system lifetime (i.e., 20 yr). The total emissions from the source-separated scenario were estimated to be 11 [8.3–23] kg CO(2) eq·cap(–1)·yr(–1), compared to 49 [28–77] kg CO(2) eq·cap(–1)·yr(–1) for mixed excreta. Both scenarios fall below the estimates of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for anaerobic treatment of fecal sludge collected from pit latrines. Source-separation also creates opportunities for resource recovery to offset costs through nutrient recovery and carbon sequestration with biochar production. For example, when carbon is valued at 150 USD·Mg(–1) of CO(2), the per capita cost of sanitation can be further reduced by 44 and 40% for the source-separated and mixed excreta scenarios, respectively. Overall, our results demonstrate that pyrolysis-based OP technology can provide low-cost, low-GHG fecal sludge treatment while reducing global sanitation gaps. American Chemical Society 2022-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9502014/ /pubmed/36164351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsenvironau.2c00022 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Rowles, Lewis Stetson
Morgan, Victoria L.
Li, Yalin
Zhang, Xinyi
Watabe, Shion
Stephen, Tyler
Lohman, Hannah A. C.
DeSouza, Derek
Hallowell, Jeff
Cusick, Roland D.
Guest, Jeremy S.
Financial Viability and Environmental Sustainability of Fecal Sludge Treatment with Pyrolysis Omni Processors
title Financial Viability and Environmental Sustainability of Fecal Sludge Treatment with Pyrolysis Omni Processors
title_full Financial Viability and Environmental Sustainability of Fecal Sludge Treatment with Pyrolysis Omni Processors
title_fullStr Financial Viability and Environmental Sustainability of Fecal Sludge Treatment with Pyrolysis Omni Processors
title_full_unstemmed Financial Viability and Environmental Sustainability of Fecal Sludge Treatment with Pyrolysis Omni Processors
title_short Financial Viability and Environmental Sustainability of Fecal Sludge Treatment with Pyrolysis Omni Processors
title_sort financial viability and environmental sustainability of fecal sludge treatment with pyrolysis omni processors
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36164351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsenvironau.2c00022
work_keys_str_mv AT rowleslewisstetson financialviabilityandenvironmentalsustainabilityoffecalsludgetreatmentwithpyrolysisomniprocessors
AT morganvictorial financialviabilityandenvironmentalsustainabilityoffecalsludgetreatmentwithpyrolysisomniprocessors
AT liyalin financialviabilityandenvironmentalsustainabilityoffecalsludgetreatmentwithpyrolysisomniprocessors
AT zhangxinyi financialviabilityandenvironmentalsustainabilityoffecalsludgetreatmentwithpyrolysisomniprocessors
AT watabeshion financialviabilityandenvironmentalsustainabilityoffecalsludgetreatmentwithpyrolysisomniprocessors
AT stephentyler financialviabilityandenvironmentalsustainabilityoffecalsludgetreatmentwithpyrolysisomniprocessors
AT lohmanhannahac financialviabilityandenvironmentalsustainabilityoffecalsludgetreatmentwithpyrolysisomniprocessors
AT desouzaderek financialviabilityandenvironmentalsustainabilityoffecalsludgetreatmentwithpyrolysisomniprocessors
AT hallowelljeff financialviabilityandenvironmentalsustainabilityoffecalsludgetreatmentwithpyrolysisomniprocessors
AT cusickrolandd financialviabilityandenvironmentalsustainabilityoffecalsludgetreatmentwithpyrolysisomniprocessors
AT guestjeremys financialviabilityandenvironmentalsustainabilityoffecalsludgetreatmentwithpyrolysisomniprocessors