Cargando…

Evaluating physical activity interventions for socioeconomically disadvantaged adults through the RE-AIM framework: A systematic review of experimental and non–/quasi-experimental trials

The promotion of physical activity in people from lower social strata is a public health priority. Previous reviews of physical activity interventions among socioeconomically disadvantaged adults have focused on intervention effectiveness without considering their translation into practice. This rev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Linder, Stephanie, Ferschl, Susanne, Abu-Omar, Karim, Ziemainz, Heiko, Reimers, Anne Kerstin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36161121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101943
_version_ 1784795612115369984
author Linder, Stephanie
Ferschl, Susanne
Abu-Omar, Karim
Ziemainz, Heiko
Reimers, Anne Kerstin
author_facet Linder, Stephanie
Ferschl, Susanne
Abu-Omar, Karim
Ziemainz, Heiko
Reimers, Anne Kerstin
author_sort Linder, Stephanie
collection PubMed
description The promotion of physical activity in people from lower social strata is a public health priority. Previous reviews of physical activity interventions among socioeconomically disadvantaged adults have focused on intervention effectiveness without considering their translation into practice. This review utilised the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Efficacy/Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) to (1) evaluate the extent to which experimental and non–/quasi-experimental trials of interventions to promote physical activity among socioeconomically disadvantaged adults report on issues of internal and external validity and (2) to provide recommendations for future intervention studies. Four databases were searched through June 2021. We included studies published in English or German since 2000 that tested physical activity interventions for socioeconomically disadvantaged adults. Two researchers coded all studies using a validated RE-AIM data extraction tool with 61 indicators referring to internal and external validity. Binary coding (yes = 1/no = 0) was applied to calculate the number and percentage of studies reporting each of the indicators. We included 39 studies of which 22 were non–/quasi-experimental trials. Indicators of reach were most frequently reported (59.2%), followed by implementation (38.9%) and efficacy/effectiveness (28.9%). Dimensions related to external validity were least frequently reported (adoption: 21.9%, maintenance: 17.8%). Few differences were found between experimental and non–/quasi-experimental trials. Analysis showed overall poor reporting of components related to internal and external validity. We recommend that future research should increase attention on reporting indicators of internal and external validity to facilitate their translation and implementation into real world settings. Trial registration: The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021283688).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9502049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95020492022-09-24 Evaluating physical activity interventions for socioeconomically disadvantaged adults through the RE-AIM framework: A systematic review of experimental and non–/quasi-experimental trials Linder, Stephanie Ferschl, Susanne Abu-Omar, Karim Ziemainz, Heiko Reimers, Anne Kerstin Prev Med Rep Review Article The promotion of physical activity in people from lower social strata is a public health priority. Previous reviews of physical activity interventions among socioeconomically disadvantaged adults have focused on intervention effectiveness without considering their translation into practice. This review utilised the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Efficacy/Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) to (1) evaluate the extent to which experimental and non–/quasi-experimental trials of interventions to promote physical activity among socioeconomically disadvantaged adults report on issues of internal and external validity and (2) to provide recommendations for future intervention studies. Four databases were searched through June 2021. We included studies published in English or German since 2000 that tested physical activity interventions for socioeconomically disadvantaged adults. Two researchers coded all studies using a validated RE-AIM data extraction tool with 61 indicators referring to internal and external validity. Binary coding (yes = 1/no = 0) was applied to calculate the number and percentage of studies reporting each of the indicators. We included 39 studies of which 22 were non–/quasi-experimental trials. Indicators of reach were most frequently reported (59.2%), followed by implementation (38.9%) and efficacy/effectiveness (28.9%). Dimensions related to external validity were least frequently reported (adoption: 21.9%, maintenance: 17.8%). Few differences were found between experimental and non–/quasi-experimental trials. Analysis showed overall poor reporting of components related to internal and external validity. We recommend that future research should increase attention on reporting indicators of internal and external validity to facilitate their translation and implementation into real world settings. Trial registration: The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021283688). 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9502049/ /pubmed/36161121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101943 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Linder, Stephanie
Ferschl, Susanne
Abu-Omar, Karim
Ziemainz, Heiko
Reimers, Anne Kerstin
Evaluating physical activity interventions for socioeconomically disadvantaged adults through the RE-AIM framework: A systematic review of experimental and non–/quasi-experimental trials
title Evaluating physical activity interventions for socioeconomically disadvantaged adults through the RE-AIM framework: A systematic review of experimental and non–/quasi-experimental trials
title_full Evaluating physical activity interventions for socioeconomically disadvantaged adults through the RE-AIM framework: A systematic review of experimental and non–/quasi-experimental trials
title_fullStr Evaluating physical activity interventions for socioeconomically disadvantaged adults through the RE-AIM framework: A systematic review of experimental and non–/quasi-experimental trials
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating physical activity interventions for socioeconomically disadvantaged adults through the RE-AIM framework: A systematic review of experimental and non–/quasi-experimental trials
title_short Evaluating physical activity interventions for socioeconomically disadvantaged adults through the RE-AIM framework: A systematic review of experimental and non–/quasi-experimental trials
title_sort evaluating physical activity interventions for socioeconomically disadvantaged adults through the re-aim framework: a systematic review of experimental and non–/quasi-experimental trials
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36161121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101943
work_keys_str_mv AT linderstephanie evaluatingphysicalactivityinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedadultsthroughthereaimframeworkasystematicreviewofexperimentalandnonquasiexperimentaltrials
AT ferschlsusanne evaluatingphysicalactivityinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedadultsthroughthereaimframeworkasystematicreviewofexperimentalandnonquasiexperimentaltrials
AT abuomarkarim evaluatingphysicalactivityinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedadultsthroughthereaimframeworkasystematicreviewofexperimentalandnonquasiexperimentaltrials
AT ziemainzheiko evaluatingphysicalactivityinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedadultsthroughthereaimframeworkasystematicreviewofexperimentalandnonquasiexperimentaltrials
AT reimersannekerstin evaluatingphysicalactivityinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedadultsthroughthereaimframeworkasystematicreviewofexperimentalandnonquasiexperimentaltrials