Cargando…
Mini-Implant Rejection Rate in Teenage Patients Depending on Insertion Site: A Retrospective Study
Mini-implants have undeniable advantages in Orthodontics. However, the use of mini-implants shows some limitations and disadvantages related to patient age, the quality of the bone tissue, the characteristics of the oral mucosa, implant site, the state of health of the organism and the quality of or...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36142978 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185331 |
_version_ | 1784795623989444608 |
---|---|
author | Bungău, Teodora Consuela Vaida, Luminița Ligia Moca, Abel Emanuel Ciavoi, Gabriela Iurcov, Raluca Romanul, Ioana Mihaela Buhaș, Camelia Liana |
author_facet | Bungău, Teodora Consuela Vaida, Luminița Ligia Moca, Abel Emanuel Ciavoi, Gabriela Iurcov, Raluca Romanul, Ioana Mihaela Buhaș, Camelia Liana |
author_sort | Bungău, Teodora Consuela |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mini-implants have undeniable advantages in Orthodontics. However, the use of mini-implants shows some limitations and disadvantages related to patient age, the quality of the bone tissue, the characteristics of the oral mucosa, implant site, the state of health of the organism and the quality of oral hygiene. The aim of this paper was to analyze the rejection rate of mini-implants in teenage patients, depending on their insertion site, and examine their stability up to three months after insertion. This retrospective study was conducted on dental charts belonging to patients aged between 12 and 17 years, from Oradea, Romania. The mini-implants were placed for various therapeutic reasons and were inserted in the following sites: buccal maxillary area, the infrazygomatic region, palatal area, buccal mandibular area and lingual area; they had a diameter of 1.6 mm (inter-radicular spaces) and of 2 mm (nonbearing tooth areas), and a length of 6–8 mm (mandible) or 8–10 mm (maxilla). The rejection rate was checked in the first month, second month, third month and after the third month from insertion. A total of 432 patients were included in the study, and they had a total of 573 mini-implants. Most implants were placed in the buccal region of the maxilla (27.7%), and most patients had one mini-implant placed (65.7%). The highest rejection rate was obtained in the first month (15.2%). The rejection rate between genders was similar. The mini-implants from the buccal mandibular region had a significantly higher rate of rejection in the first month (M1) in comparison to the mini-implants from the palatal region (24.4% vs. 8.3%). The mini-implants from the lingual region of the mandible had a significantly higher rate of rejection in the second month (M2) in comparison to the mini-implants from the infrazygomatic or the palatal region (10.5% vs. 0%/0%). Mini-implants are very useful for carrying out various orthodontic treatments, but their stability should be enhanced. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9502099 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95020992022-09-24 Mini-Implant Rejection Rate in Teenage Patients Depending on Insertion Site: A Retrospective Study Bungău, Teodora Consuela Vaida, Luminița Ligia Moca, Abel Emanuel Ciavoi, Gabriela Iurcov, Raluca Romanul, Ioana Mihaela Buhaș, Camelia Liana J Clin Med Article Mini-implants have undeniable advantages in Orthodontics. However, the use of mini-implants shows some limitations and disadvantages related to patient age, the quality of the bone tissue, the characteristics of the oral mucosa, implant site, the state of health of the organism and the quality of oral hygiene. The aim of this paper was to analyze the rejection rate of mini-implants in teenage patients, depending on their insertion site, and examine their stability up to three months after insertion. This retrospective study was conducted on dental charts belonging to patients aged between 12 and 17 years, from Oradea, Romania. The mini-implants were placed for various therapeutic reasons and were inserted in the following sites: buccal maxillary area, the infrazygomatic region, palatal area, buccal mandibular area and lingual area; they had a diameter of 1.6 mm (inter-radicular spaces) and of 2 mm (nonbearing tooth areas), and a length of 6–8 mm (mandible) or 8–10 mm (maxilla). The rejection rate was checked in the first month, second month, third month and after the third month from insertion. A total of 432 patients were included in the study, and they had a total of 573 mini-implants. Most implants were placed in the buccal region of the maxilla (27.7%), and most patients had one mini-implant placed (65.7%). The highest rejection rate was obtained in the first month (15.2%). The rejection rate between genders was similar. The mini-implants from the buccal mandibular region had a significantly higher rate of rejection in the first month (M1) in comparison to the mini-implants from the palatal region (24.4% vs. 8.3%). The mini-implants from the lingual region of the mandible had a significantly higher rate of rejection in the second month (M2) in comparison to the mini-implants from the infrazygomatic or the palatal region (10.5% vs. 0%/0%). Mini-implants are very useful for carrying out various orthodontic treatments, but their stability should be enhanced. MDPI 2022-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9502099/ /pubmed/36142978 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185331 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bungău, Teodora Consuela Vaida, Luminița Ligia Moca, Abel Emanuel Ciavoi, Gabriela Iurcov, Raluca Romanul, Ioana Mihaela Buhaș, Camelia Liana Mini-Implant Rejection Rate in Teenage Patients Depending on Insertion Site: A Retrospective Study |
title | Mini-Implant Rejection Rate in Teenage Patients Depending on Insertion Site: A Retrospective Study |
title_full | Mini-Implant Rejection Rate in Teenage Patients Depending on Insertion Site: A Retrospective Study |
title_fullStr | Mini-Implant Rejection Rate in Teenage Patients Depending on Insertion Site: A Retrospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Mini-Implant Rejection Rate in Teenage Patients Depending on Insertion Site: A Retrospective Study |
title_short | Mini-Implant Rejection Rate in Teenage Patients Depending on Insertion Site: A Retrospective Study |
title_sort | mini-implant rejection rate in teenage patients depending on insertion site: a retrospective study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36142978 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185331 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bungauteodoraconsuela miniimplantrejectionrateinteenagepatientsdependingoninsertionsitearetrospectivestudy AT vaidaluminitaligia miniimplantrejectionrateinteenagepatientsdependingoninsertionsitearetrospectivestudy AT mocaabelemanuel miniimplantrejectionrateinteenagepatientsdependingoninsertionsitearetrospectivestudy AT ciavoigabriela miniimplantrejectionrateinteenagepatientsdependingoninsertionsitearetrospectivestudy AT iurcovraluca miniimplantrejectionrateinteenagepatientsdependingoninsertionsitearetrospectivestudy AT romanulioanamihaela miniimplantrejectionrateinteenagepatientsdependingoninsertionsitearetrospectivestudy AT buhascamelialiana miniimplantrejectionrateinteenagepatientsdependingoninsertionsitearetrospectivestudy |