Cargando…
Comparison of Primers for the Detection of Phytophthora (and Other Oomycetes) from Environmental Samples
Many oomycetes are important plant pathogens that cause devastating diseases in agricultural fields, orchards, urban areas, and natural ecosystems. Limitations and difficulties associated with isolating these pathogens have led to a strong uptake of DNA metabarcoding and mass parallel sequencing. At...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36135707 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8090980 |
_version_ | 1784795661307215872 |
---|---|
author | Burgess, Treena I. White, Diane Sapsford, Sarah J. |
author_facet | Burgess, Treena I. White, Diane Sapsford, Sarah J. |
author_sort | Burgess, Treena I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many oomycetes are important plant pathogens that cause devastating diseases in agricultural fields, orchards, urban areas, and natural ecosystems. Limitations and difficulties associated with isolating these pathogens have led to a strong uptake of DNA metabarcoding and mass parallel sequencing. At least 21 primer combinations have been designed to amplify oomycetes, or more specifically, Phytophthora species, from environmental samples. We used the Illumina sequencing platform to compare 13 primer combinations on mock communities and environmental samples. The primer combinations tested varied significantly in their ability to amplify Phytophthora species in a mock community and from environmental samples; this was due to either low sensitivity (unable to detect species present in low concentrations) or a lack of specificity (an inability to amplify some species even if they were present in high concentrations). Primers designed for oomycetes underestimated the Phytophthora community compared to Phytophthora-specific primers. We recommend using technical replicates, primer combinations, internal controls, and a phylogenetic approach for assigning a species identity to OTUs or ASVs. Particular care must be taken if sampling substrates where hybrid species could be expected. Overall, the choice of primers should depend upon the hypothesis being tested. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9502258 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95022582022-09-24 Comparison of Primers for the Detection of Phytophthora (and Other Oomycetes) from Environmental Samples Burgess, Treena I. White, Diane Sapsford, Sarah J. J Fungi (Basel) Article Many oomycetes are important plant pathogens that cause devastating diseases in agricultural fields, orchards, urban areas, and natural ecosystems. Limitations and difficulties associated with isolating these pathogens have led to a strong uptake of DNA metabarcoding and mass parallel sequencing. At least 21 primer combinations have been designed to amplify oomycetes, or more specifically, Phytophthora species, from environmental samples. We used the Illumina sequencing platform to compare 13 primer combinations on mock communities and environmental samples. The primer combinations tested varied significantly in their ability to amplify Phytophthora species in a mock community and from environmental samples; this was due to either low sensitivity (unable to detect species present in low concentrations) or a lack of specificity (an inability to amplify some species even if they were present in high concentrations). Primers designed for oomycetes underestimated the Phytophthora community compared to Phytophthora-specific primers. We recommend using technical replicates, primer combinations, internal controls, and a phylogenetic approach for assigning a species identity to OTUs or ASVs. Particular care must be taken if sampling substrates where hybrid species could be expected. Overall, the choice of primers should depend upon the hypothesis being tested. MDPI 2022-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9502258/ /pubmed/36135707 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8090980 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Burgess, Treena I. White, Diane Sapsford, Sarah J. Comparison of Primers for the Detection of Phytophthora (and Other Oomycetes) from Environmental Samples |
title | Comparison of Primers for the Detection of Phytophthora (and Other Oomycetes) from Environmental Samples |
title_full | Comparison of Primers for the Detection of Phytophthora (and Other Oomycetes) from Environmental Samples |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Primers for the Detection of Phytophthora (and Other Oomycetes) from Environmental Samples |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Primers for the Detection of Phytophthora (and Other Oomycetes) from Environmental Samples |
title_short | Comparison of Primers for the Detection of Phytophthora (and Other Oomycetes) from Environmental Samples |
title_sort | comparison of primers for the detection of phytophthora (and other oomycetes) from environmental samples |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36135707 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8090980 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burgesstreenai comparisonofprimersforthedetectionofphytophthoraandotheroomycetesfromenvironmentalsamples AT whitediane comparisonofprimersforthedetectionofphytophthoraandotheroomycetesfromenvironmentalsamples AT sapsfordsarahj comparisonofprimersforthedetectionofphytophthoraandotheroomycetesfromenvironmentalsamples |