Cargando…

Diagnosis of Fungal Keratitis in Low-Income Countries: Evaluation of Smear Microscopy, Culture, and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Nepal

Clinically diagnosing fungal keratitis (FK) is challenging; diagnosis can be assisted by investigations including in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), smear microscopy, and culture. The aim of this study was to estimate the sensitivity in detecting fungal keratitis (FK) using IVCM, smear microscopy,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoffman, Jeremy J., Yadav, Reena, Sanyam, Sandip Das, Chaudhary, Pankaj, Roshan, Abhishek, Singh, Sanjay Kumar, Arunga, Simon, Hu, Victor H., Macleod, David, Leck, Astrid, Burton, Matthew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36135680
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8090955
_version_ 1784795663582625792
author Hoffman, Jeremy J.
Yadav, Reena
Sanyam, Sandip Das
Chaudhary, Pankaj
Roshan, Abhishek
Singh, Sanjay Kumar
Arunga, Simon
Hu, Victor H.
Macleod, David
Leck, Astrid
Burton, Matthew J.
author_facet Hoffman, Jeremy J.
Yadav, Reena
Sanyam, Sandip Das
Chaudhary, Pankaj
Roshan, Abhishek
Singh, Sanjay Kumar
Arunga, Simon
Hu, Victor H.
Macleod, David
Leck, Astrid
Burton, Matthew J.
author_sort Hoffman, Jeremy J.
collection PubMed
description Clinically diagnosing fungal keratitis (FK) is challenging; diagnosis can be assisted by investigations including in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), smear microscopy, and culture. The aim of this study was to estimate the sensitivity in detecting fungal keratitis (FK) using IVCM, smear microscopy, and culture in a setting with a high prevalence of FK. In this cross-sectional study nested within a prospective cohort study, consecutive microbial keratitis (MK) patients attending a tertiary-referral eye hospital in south-eastern Nepal between June 2019 and November 2020 were recruited. IVCM and corneal scrapes for smear microscopy and culture were performed using a standardised protocol. Smear microscopy was performed using potassium hydroxide (KOH), Gram stain, and calcofluor white. The primary outcomes were sensitivities with 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] for IVCM, smear microscopy and culture, and for each different microscopy stain independently, to detect FK compared to a composite referent. We enrolled 642 patients with MK; 468/642 (72.9%) were filamentous FK, 32/642 (5.0%) were bacterial keratitis and 64/642 (10.0%) were mixed bacterial-filamentous FK, with one yeast infection (0.16%). No organism was identified in 77/642 (12.0%). Smear microscopy had the highest sensitivity (90.7% [87.9–93.1%]), followed by IVCM (89.8% [86.9–92.3%]) and culture (75.7% [71.8–79.3%]). Of the three smear microscopy stains, KOH had the highest sensitivity (85.3% [81.9–88.4%]), followed by Gram stain (83.2% [79.7–86.4%]) and calcofluor white (79.1% [75.4–82.5%]). Smear microscopy and IVCM were the most sensitive tools for identifying FK in our cohort. In low-resource settings we recommend clinicians perform corneal scrapes for microscopy using KOH and Gram staining. Culture remains an important tool to diagnose bacterial infection, identify causative fungi and enable antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9502267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95022672022-09-24 Diagnosis of Fungal Keratitis in Low-Income Countries: Evaluation of Smear Microscopy, Culture, and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Nepal Hoffman, Jeremy J. Yadav, Reena Sanyam, Sandip Das Chaudhary, Pankaj Roshan, Abhishek Singh, Sanjay Kumar Arunga, Simon Hu, Victor H. Macleod, David Leck, Astrid Burton, Matthew J. J Fungi (Basel) Article Clinically diagnosing fungal keratitis (FK) is challenging; diagnosis can be assisted by investigations including in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), smear microscopy, and culture. The aim of this study was to estimate the sensitivity in detecting fungal keratitis (FK) using IVCM, smear microscopy, and culture in a setting with a high prevalence of FK. In this cross-sectional study nested within a prospective cohort study, consecutive microbial keratitis (MK) patients attending a tertiary-referral eye hospital in south-eastern Nepal between June 2019 and November 2020 were recruited. IVCM and corneal scrapes for smear microscopy and culture were performed using a standardised protocol. Smear microscopy was performed using potassium hydroxide (KOH), Gram stain, and calcofluor white. The primary outcomes were sensitivities with 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] for IVCM, smear microscopy and culture, and for each different microscopy stain independently, to detect FK compared to a composite referent. We enrolled 642 patients with MK; 468/642 (72.9%) were filamentous FK, 32/642 (5.0%) were bacterial keratitis and 64/642 (10.0%) were mixed bacterial-filamentous FK, with one yeast infection (0.16%). No organism was identified in 77/642 (12.0%). Smear microscopy had the highest sensitivity (90.7% [87.9–93.1%]), followed by IVCM (89.8% [86.9–92.3%]) and culture (75.7% [71.8–79.3%]). Of the three smear microscopy stains, KOH had the highest sensitivity (85.3% [81.9–88.4%]), followed by Gram stain (83.2% [79.7–86.4%]) and calcofluor white (79.1% [75.4–82.5%]). Smear microscopy and IVCM were the most sensitive tools for identifying FK in our cohort. In low-resource settings we recommend clinicians perform corneal scrapes for microscopy using KOH and Gram staining. Culture remains an important tool to diagnose bacterial infection, identify causative fungi and enable antimicrobial susceptibility testing. MDPI 2022-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9502267/ /pubmed/36135680 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8090955 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hoffman, Jeremy J.
Yadav, Reena
Sanyam, Sandip Das
Chaudhary, Pankaj
Roshan, Abhishek
Singh, Sanjay Kumar
Arunga, Simon
Hu, Victor H.
Macleod, David
Leck, Astrid
Burton, Matthew J.
Diagnosis of Fungal Keratitis in Low-Income Countries: Evaluation of Smear Microscopy, Culture, and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Nepal
title Diagnosis of Fungal Keratitis in Low-Income Countries: Evaluation of Smear Microscopy, Culture, and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Nepal
title_full Diagnosis of Fungal Keratitis in Low-Income Countries: Evaluation of Smear Microscopy, Culture, and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Nepal
title_fullStr Diagnosis of Fungal Keratitis in Low-Income Countries: Evaluation of Smear Microscopy, Culture, and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Nepal
title_full_unstemmed Diagnosis of Fungal Keratitis in Low-Income Countries: Evaluation of Smear Microscopy, Culture, and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Nepal
title_short Diagnosis of Fungal Keratitis in Low-Income Countries: Evaluation of Smear Microscopy, Culture, and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Nepal
title_sort diagnosis of fungal keratitis in low-income countries: evaluation of smear microscopy, culture, and in vivo confocal microscopy in nepal
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36135680
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8090955
work_keys_str_mv AT hoffmanjeremyj diagnosisoffungalkeratitisinlowincomecountriesevaluationofsmearmicroscopycultureandinvivoconfocalmicroscopyinnepal
AT yadavreena diagnosisoffungalkeratitisinlowincomecountriesevaluationofsmearmicroscopycultureandinvivoconfocalmicroscopyinnepal
AT sanyamsandipdas diagnosisoffungalkeratitisinlowincomecountriesevaluationofsmearmicroscopycultureandinvivoconfocalmicroscopyinnepal
AT chaudharypankaj diagnosisoffungalkeratitisinlowincomecountriesevaluationofsmearmicroscopycultureandinvivoconfocalmicroscopyinnepal
AT roshanabhishek diagnosisoffungalkeratitisinlowincomecountriesevaluationofsmearmicroscopycultureandinvivoconfocalmicroscopyinnepal
AT singhsanjaykumar diagnosisoffungalkeratitisinlowincomecountriesevaluationofsmearmicroscopycultureandinvivoconfocalmicroscopyinnepal
AT arungasimon diagnosisoffungalkeratitisinlowincomecountriesevaluationofsmearmicroscopycultureandinvivoconfocalmicroscopyinnepal
AT huvictorh diagnosisoffungalkeratitisinlowincomecountriesevaluationofsmearmicroscopycultureandinvivoconfocalmicroscopyinnepal
AT macleoddavid diagnosisoffungalkeratitisinlowincomecountriesevaluationofsmearmicroscopycultureandinvivoconfocalmicroscopyinnepal
AT leckastrid diagnosisoffungalkeratitisinlowincomecountriesevaluationofsmearmicroscopycultureandinvivoconfocalmicroscopyinnepal
AT burtonmatthewj diagnosisoffungalkeratitisinlowincomecountriesevaluationofsmearmicroscopycultureandinvivoconfocalmicroscopyinnepal