Cargando…
Diagnosis of Fungal Keratitis in Low-Income Countries: Evaluation of Smear Microscopy, Culture, and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Nepal
Clinically diagnosing fungal keratitis (FK) is challenging; diagnosis can be assisted by investigations including in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), smear microscopy, and culture. The aim of this study was to estimate the sensitivity in detecting fungal keratitis (FK) using IVCM, smear microscopy,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36135680 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8090955 |
_version_ | 1784795663582625792 |
---|---|
author | Hoffman, Jeremy J. Yadav, Reena Sanyam, Sandip Das Chaudhary, Pankaj Roshan, Abhishek Singh, Sanjay Kumar Arunga, Simon Hu, Victor H. Macleod, David Leck, Astrid Burton, Matthew J. |
author_facet | Hoffman, Jeremy J. Yadav, Reena Sanyam, Sandip Das Chaudhary, Pankaj Roshan, Abhishek Singh, Sanjay Kumar Arunga, Simon Hu, Victor H. Macleod, David Leck, Astrid Burton, Matthew J. |
author_sort | Hoffman, Jeremy J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinically diagnosing fungal keratitis (FK) is challenging; diagnosis can be assisted by investigations including in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), smear microscopy, and culture. The aim of this study was to estimate the sensitivity in detecting fungal keratitis (FK) using IVCM, smear microscopy, and culture in a setting with a high prevalence of FK. In this cross-sectional study nested within a prospective cohort study, consecutive microbial keratitis (MK) patients attending a tertiary-referral eye hospital in south-eastern Nepal between June 2019 and November 2020 were recruited. IVCM and corneal scrapes for smear microscopy and culture were performed using a standardised protocol. Smear microscopy was performed using potassium hydroxide (KOH), Gram stain, and calcofluor white. The primary outcomes were sensitivities with 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] for IVCM, smear microscopy and culture, and for each different microscopy stain independently, to detect FK compared to a composite referent. We enrolled 642 patients with MK; 468/642 (72.9%) were filamentous FK, 32/642 (5.0%) were bacterial keratitis and 64/642 (10.0%) were mixed bacterial-filamentous FK, with one yeast infection (0.16%). No organism was identified in 77/642 (12.0%). Smear microscopy had the highest sensitivity (90.7% [87.9–93.1%]), followed by IVCM (89.8% [86.9–92.3%]) and culture (75.7% [71.8–79.3%]). Of the three smear microscopy stains, KOH had the highest sensitivity (85.3% [81.9–88.4%]), followed by Gram stain (83.2% [79.7–86.4%]) and calcofluor white (79.1% [75.4–82.5%]). Smear microscopy and IVCM were the most sensitive tools for identifying FK in our cohort. In low-resource settings we recommend clinicians perform corneal scrapes for microscopy using KOH and Gram staining. Culture remains an important tool to diagnose bacterial infection, identify causative fungi and enable antimicrobial susceptibility testing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9502267 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95022672022-09-24 Diagnosis of Fungal Keratitis in Low-Income Countries: Evaluation of Smear Microscopy, Culture, and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Nepal Hoffman, Jeremy J. Yadav, Reena Sanyam, Sandip Das Chaudhary, Pankaj Roshan, Abhishek Singh, Sanjay Kumar Arunga, Simon Hu, Victor H. Macleod, David Leck, Astrid Burton, Matthew J. J Fungi (Basel) Article Clinically diagnosing fungal keratitis (FK) is challenging; diagnosis can be assisted by investigations including in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), smear microscopy, and culture. The aim of this study was to estimate the sensitivity in detecting fungal keratitis (FK) using IVCM, smear microscopy, and culture in a setting with a high prevalence of FK. In this cross-sectional study nested within a prospective cohort study, consecutive microbial keratitis (MK) patients attending a tertiary-referral eye hospital in south-eastern Nepal between June 2019 and November 2020 were recruited. IVCM and corneal scrapes for smear microscopy and culture were performed using a standardised protocol. Smear microscopy was performed using potassium hydroxide (KOH), Gram stain, and calcofluor white. The primary outcomes were sensitivities with 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] for IVCM, smear microscopy and culture, and for each different microscopy stain independently, to detect FK compared to a composite referent. We enrolled 642 patients with MK; 468/642 (72.9%) were filamentous FK, 32/642 (5.0%) were bacterial keratitis and 64/642 (10.0%) were mixed bacterial-filamentous FK, with one yeast infection (0.16%). No organism was identified in 77/642 (12.0%). Smear microscopy had the highest sensitivity (90.7% [87.9–93.1%]), followed by IVCM (89.8% [86.9–92.3%]) and culture (75.7% [71.8–79.3%]). Of the three smear microscopy stains, KOH had the highest sensitivity (85.3% [81.9–88.4%]), followed by Gram stain (83.2% [79.7–86.4%]) and calcofluor white (79.1% [75.4–82.5%]). Smear microscopy and IVCM were the most sensitive tools for identifying FK in our cohort. In low-resource settings we recommend clinicians perform corneal scrapes for microscopy using KOH and Gram staining. Culture remains an important tool to diagnose bacterial infection, identify causative fungi and enable antimicrobial susceptibility testing. MDPI 2022-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9502267/ /pubmed/36135680 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8090955 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hoffman, Jeremy J. Yadav, Reena Sanyam, Sandip Das Chaudhary, Pankaj Roshan, Abhishek Singh, Sanjay Kumar Arunga, Simon Hu, Victor H. Macleod, David Leck, Astrid Burton, Matthew J. Diagnosis of Fungal Keratitis in Low-Income Countries: Evaluation of Smear Microscopy, Culture, and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Nepal |
title | Diagnosis of Fungal Keratitis in Low-Income Countries: Evaluation of Smear Microscopy, Culture, and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Nepal |
title_full | Diagnosis of Fungal Keratitis in Low-Income Countries: Evaluation of Smear Microscopy, Culture, and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Nepal |
title_fullStr | Diagnosis of Fungal Keratitis in Low-Income Countries: Evaluation of Smear Microscopy, Culture, and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Nepal |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnosis of Fungal Keratitis in Low-Income Countries: Evaluation of Smear Microscopy, Culture, and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Nepal |
title_short | Diagnosis of Fungal Keratitis in Low-Income Countries: Evaluation of Smear Microscopy, Culture, and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Nepal |
title_sort | diagnosis of fungal keratitis in low-income countries: evaluation of smear microscopy, culture, and in vivo confocal microscopy in nepal |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36135680 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8090955 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoffmanjeremyj diagnosisoffungalkeratitisinlowincomecountriesevaluationofsmearmicroscopycultureandinvivoconfocalmicroscopyinnepal AT yadavreena diagnosisoffungalkeratitisinlowincomecountriesevaluationofsmearmicroscopycultureandinvivoconfocalmicroscopyinnepal AT sanyamsandipdas diagnosisoffungalkeratitisinlowincomecountriesevaluationofsmearmicroscopycultureandinvivoconfocalmicroscopyinnepal AT chaudharypankaj diagnosisoffungalkeratitisinlowincomecountriesevaluationofsmearmicroscopycultureandinvivoconfocalmicroscopyinnepal AT roshanabhishek diagnosisoffungalkeratitisinlowincomecountriesevaluationofsmearmicroscopycultureandinvivoconfocalmicroscopyinnepal AT singhsanjaykumar diagnosisoffungalkeratitisinlowincomecountriesevaluationofsmearmicroscopycultureandinvivoconfocalmicroscopyinnepal AT arungasimon diagnosisoffungalkeratitisinlowincomecountriesevaluationofsmearmicroscopycultureandinvivoconfocalmicroscopyinnepal AT huvictorh diagnosisoffungalkeratitisinlowincomecountriesevaluationofsmearmicroscopycultureandinvivoconfocalmicroscopyinnepal AT macleoddavid diagnosisoffungalkeratitisinlowincomecountriesevaluationofsmearmicroscopycultureandinvivoconfocalmicroscopyinnepal AT leckastrid diagnosisoffungalkeratitisinlowincomecountriesevaluationofsmearmicroscopycultureandinvivoconfocalmicroscopyinnepal AT burtonmatthewj diagnosisoffungalkeratitisinlowincomecountriesevaluationofsmearmicroscopycultureandinvivoconfocalmicroscopyinnepal |