Cargando…

“I Would Never Push a Vaccine on You”: A Qualitative Study of Social Norms and Pressure in Vaccine Behavior in the U.S.

Previous researchers have established the influence of social norms on vaccine behavior. However, little work has been performed contextualizing individuals’ experience with these social factors and how they operate to persuade individuals’ acceptance or refusal of a vaccine. We aimed to determine t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Cheryl, Parker, Taylor, Pejavara, Kartik, Smith, Danielle, Tu, Rungting, Tu, Pikuei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36146480
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10091402
_version_ 1784795669355036672
author Lin, Cheryl
Parker, Taylor
Pejavara, Kartik
Smith, Danielle
Tu, Rungting
Tu, Pikuei
author_facet Lin, Cheryl
Parker, Taylor
Pejavara, Kartik
Smith, Danielle
Tu, Rungting
Tu, Pikuei
author_sort Lin, Cheryl
collection PubMed
description Previous researchers have established the influence of social norms on vaccine behavior. However, little work has been performed contextualizing individuals’ experience with these social factors and how they operate to persuade individuals’ acceptance or refusal of a vaccine. We aimed to determine the mechanisms of familial and societal pressure or expectations that contribute to COVID-19 vaccine decision-making. We conducted four focus groups and eleven individual interviews (total n = 32) with participants from across the U.S. of different vaccination statuses. We identified three emergent themes: (1) Altruistic reasoning was particularly prevalent among initially hesitant late adopters—the desire to protect loved ones and others constituted a dominant motive, more powerful than protecting oneself. Vaccination was also reckoned as part of a joint effort to return to normal life; hence, it invoked a sense of responsibility or “obligation”; (2) expectation often became pressure; although most vaccinated participants stated that they respected others’ choices, late adopters or unvaccinated participants perceived differently and felt rushed or “forced” into choosing, and many resented being “targeted” or “bullied”; (3) vaccination status became a new label, frequently dividing families, thus producing familial mandates, exclusions, or social stratifications. This caused sadness and feelings of isolation, along with the formation of a camaraderie among the excluded unvaccinated. A vaccine decision builds from the complexities of individuals’ experiences and cultures. The vaccinated were not free of hesitancy nor were the unvaccinated all anti-vaxxers. Vigorous vaccine promotion successfully converted some undecided individuals but also fostered distrust of government; alarmingly, the push to receive the COVID-19 vaccine further triggered doubts about established vaccines. Communication strategies need to be developed and implemented carefully so as not to ostracize the unvaccinated community and strengthen their resistance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9502292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95022922022-09-24 “I Would Never Push a Vaccine on You”: A Qualitative Study of Social Norms and Pressure in Vaccine Behavior in the U.S. Lin, Cheryl Parker, Taylor Pejavara, Kartik Smith, Danielle Tu, Rungting Tu, Pikuei Vaccines (Basel) Article Previous researchers have established the influence of social norms on vaccine behavior. However, little work has been performed contextualizing individuals’ experience with these social factors and how they operate to persuade individuals’ acceptance or refusal of a vaccine. We aimed to determine the mechanisms of familial and societal pressure or expectations that contribute to COVID-19 vaccine decision-making. We conducted four focus groups and eleven individual interviews (total n = 32) with participants from across the U.S. of different vaccination statuses. We identified three emergent themes: (1) Altruistic reasoning was particularly prevalent among initially hesitant late adopters—the desire to protect loved ones and others constituted a dominant motive, more powerful than protecting oneself. Vaccination was also reckoned as part of a joint effort to return to normal life; hence, it invoked a sense of responsibility or “obligation”; (2) expectation often became pressure; although most vaccinated participants stated that they respected others’ choices, late adopters or unvaccinated participants perceived differently and felt rushed or “forced” into choosing, and many resented being “targeted” or “bullied”; (3) vaccination status became a new label, frequently dividing families, thus producing familial mandates, exclusions, or social stratifications. This caused sadness and feelings of isolation, along with the formation of a camaraderie among the excluded unvaccinated. A vaccine decision builds from the complexities of individuals’ experiences and cultures. The vaccinated were not free of hesitancy nor were the unvaccinated all anti-vaxxers. Vigorous vaccine promotion successfully converted some undecided individuals but also fostered distrust of government; alarmingly, the push to receive the COVID-19 vaccine further triggered doubts about established vaccines. Communication strategies need to be developed and implemented carefully so as not to ostracize the unvaccinated community and strengthen their resistance. MDPI 2022-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9502292/ /pubmed/36146480 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10091402 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lin, Cheryl
Parker, Taylor
Pejavara, Kartik
Smith, Danielle
Tu, Rungting
Tu, Pikuei
“I Would Never Push a Vaccine on You”: A Qualitative Study of Social Norms and Pressure in Vaccine Behavior in the U.S.
title “I Would Never Push a Vaccine on You”: A Qualitative Study of Social Norms and Pressure in Vaccine Behavior in the U.S.
title_full “I Would Never Push a Vaccine on You”: A Qualitative Study of Social Norms and Pressure in Vaccine Behavior in the U.S.
title_fullStr “I Would Never Push a Vaccine on You”: A Qualitative Study of Social Norms and Pressure in Vaccine Behavior in the U.S.
title_full_unstemmed “I Would Never Push a Vaccine on You”: A Qualitative Study of Social Norms and Pressure in Vaccine Behavior in the U.S.
title_short “I Would Never Push a Vaccine on You”: A Qualitative Study of Social Norms and Pressure in Vaccine Behavior in the U.S.
title_sort “i would never push a vaccine on you”: a qualitative study of social norms and pressure in vaccine behavior in the u.s.
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36146480
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10091402
work_keys_str_mv AT lincheryl iwouldneverpushavaccineonyouaqualitativestudyofsocialnormsandpressureinvaccinebehaviorintheus
AT parkertaylor iwouldneverpushavaccineonyouaqualitativestudyofsocialnormsandpressureinvaccinebehaviorintheus
AT pejavarakartik iwouldneverpushavaccineonyouaqualitativestudyofsocialnormsandpressureinvaccinebehaviorintheus
AT smithdanielle iwouldneverpushavaccineonyouaqualitativestudyofsocialnormsandpressureinvaccinebehaviorintheus
AT turungting iwouldneverpushavaccineonyouaqualitativestudyofsocialnormsandpressureinvaccinebehaviorintheus
AT tupikuei iwouldneverpushavaccineonyouaqualitativestudyofsocialnormsandpressureinvaccinebehaviorintheus