Cargando…

The impact of offering multiple cervical screening options to women whose screening was overdue in Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland

Most women who develop cancer have not been screened regularly. One in four women in Scotland, is overdue for cervical screening. Aim was to assess the impact of offering multiple cervical screening options to women whose screening is overdue. A prospective cohort study including all women whose scr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wedisinghe, L., Sasieni, P., Currie, H., Baxter, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36161116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101947
_version_ 1784795678279467008
author Wedisinghe, L.
Sasieni, P.
Currie, H.
Baxter, G.
author_facet Wedisinghe, L.
Sasieni, P.
Currie, H.
Baxter, G.
author_sort Wedisinghe, L.
collection PubMed
description Most women who develop cancer have not been screened regularly. One in four women in Scotland, is overdue for cervical screening. Aim was to assess the impact of offering multiple cervical screening options to women whose screening is overdue. A prospective cohort study including all women whose screening was overdue, aged 30–60 years in Dumfries and Galloway in 2012. Potentially eligible women (n = 4146) were identified split into six groups. Women aged 30–55 years were allocated to three different groups. Group 1 (letter, n = 1246), Group 2 (letter and kit, n = 221), Group 3 (letter, n = 2031). Women aged 56–60 years were allocated to: Group 4 (letter, n = 292), Group 5 (letter and kit, n = 292) and Group 6 (control, n = 64). Women who self-collected a vaginal sample were requested to complete a questionnaire. The percentages of women responding were 24 % (21–26), 32 % (25–38), 16 % (14–18), 15 % (11–20) and 12 % (9–17) in groups 1 to 5 respectively, compared with 3 % (0–11) among controls. A significantly higher number of women (n = 383, 10 % of 3815) opted for self-sampling in comparison with undergoing a cervical screening test (CST) at the GP practice (n = 197, 5 %, x(2) = 59.0, p < 0.0001). The Evalyn® Brush was well accepted (218/313 = 70 %) by those who requested self-sampling. Almost all (265/272 = 97 %) women who self-collected a vaginal sample said that if they had the option of self-sampling, they would regularly participate in future cervical screening. Offering more flexible screening options, self-sampling in particular, appears to increase cervical screening participation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9502330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95023302022-09-24 The impact of offering multiple cervical screening options to women whose screening was overdue in Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland Wedisinghe, L. Sasieni, P. Currie, H. Baxter, G. Prev Med Rep Regular Article Most women who develop cancer have not been screened regularly. One in four women in Scotland, is overdue for cervical screening. Aim was to assess the impact of offering multiple cervical screening options to women whose screening is overdue. A prospective cohort study including all women whose screening was overdue, aged 30–60 years in Dumfries and Galloway in 2012. Potentially eligible women (n = 4146) were identified split into six groups. Women aged 30–55 years were allocated to three different groups. Group 1 (letter, n = 1246), Group 2 (letter and kit, n = 221), Group 3 (letter, n = 2031). Women aged 56–60 years were allocated to: Group 4 (letter, n = 292), Group 5 (letter and kit, n = 292) and Group 6 (control, n = 64). Women who self-collected a vaginal sample were requested to complete a questionnaire. The percentages of women responding were 24 % (21–26), 32 % (25–38), 16 % (14–18), 15 % (11–20) and 12 % (9–17) in groups 1 to 5 respectively, compared with 3 % (0–11) among controls. A significantly higher number of women (n = 383, 10 % of 3815) opted for self-sampling in comparison with undergoing a cervical screening test (CST) at the GP practice (n = 197, 5 %, x(2) = 59.0, p < 0.0001). The Evalyn® Brush was well accepted (218/313 = 70 %) by those who requested self-sampling. Almost all (265/272 = 97 %) women who self-collected a vaginal sample said that if they had the option of self-sampling, they would regularly participate in future cervical screening. Offering more flexible screening options, self-sampling in particular, appears to increase cervical screening participation. 2022-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9502330/ /pubmed/36161116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101947 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Wedisinghe, L.
Sasieni, P.
Currie, H.
Baxter, G.
The impact of offering multiple cervical screening options to women whose screening was overdue in Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland
title The impact of offering multiple cervical screening options to women whose screening was overdue in Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland
title_full The impact of offering multiple cervical screening options to women whose screening was overdue in Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland
title_fullStr The impact of offering multiple cervical screening options to women whose screening was overdue in Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland
title_full_unstemmed The impact of offering multiple cervical screening options to women whose screening was overdue in Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland
title_short The impact of offering multiple cervical screening options to women whose screening was overdue in Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland
title_sort impact of offering multiple cervical screening options to women whose screening was overdue in dumfries and galloway, scotland
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36161116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101947
work_keys_str_mv AT wedisinghel theimpactofofferingmultiplecervicalscreeningoptionstowomenwhosescreeningwasoverdueindumfriesandgallowayscotland
AT sasienip theimpactofofferingmultiplecervicalscreeningoptionstowomenwhosescreeningwasoverdueindumfriesandgallowayscotland
AT currieh theimpactofofferingmultiplecervicalscreeningoptionstowomenwhosescreeningwasoverdueindumfriesandgallowayscotland
AT baxterg theimpactofofferingmultiplecervicalscreeningoptionstowomenwhosescreeningwasoverdueindumfriesandgallowayscotland
AT wedisinghel impactofofferingmultiplecervicalscreeningoptionstowomenwhosescreeningwasoverdueindumfriesandgallowayscotland
AT sasienip impactofofferingmultiplecervicalscreeningoptionstowomenwhosescreeningwasoverdueindumfriesandgallowayscotland
AT currieh impactofofferingmultiplecervicalscreeningoptionstowomenwhosescreeningwasoverdueindumfriesandgallowayscotland
AT baxterg impactofofferingmultiplecervicalscreeningoptionstowomenwhosescreeningwasoverdueindumfriesandgallowayscotland