Cargando…

Changes in sensory, postural stability and gait functions depending on cognitive decline, and possible markers for detection of cognitive status

BACKGROUND: Numerous people never receive a formal dementia diagnosis. This issue can be addressed by early detection systems that utilize alternative forms of classification, such as gait, balance, and sensory function parameters. In the present study, said functions were compared between older adu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kostic, Emilija, Kwak, Kiyoung, Kim, Dongwook
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01955-x
_version_ 1784795739195441152
author Kostic, Emilija
Kwak, Kiyoung
Kim, Dongwook
author_facet Kostic, Emilija
Kwak, Kiyoung
Kim, Dongwook
author_sort Kostic, Emilija
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Numerous people never receive a formal dementia diagnosis. This issue can be addressed by early detection systems that utilize alternative forms of classification, such as gait, balance, and sensory function parameters. In the present study, said functions were compared between older adults with healthy cognition, older adults with low executive function, and older adults with cognitive impairment, to determine which parameters can be used to distinguish these groups. RESULTS: A group of cognitively healthy older men was found to have a significantly greater gait cadence than both the low executive function group (113.1 ± 6.8 vs. 108.0 ± 6.3 steps/min, p = 0.032) and the cognitively impaired group (113.1 ± 6.8 vs. 107.1 ± 7.4 steps/min, p = 0.009). The group with low executive function was found to have more gait stability than the impaired cognition group, represented by the single limb support phase (39.7 ± 1.2 vs. 38.6 ± 1.3%, p = 0.027). Additionally, the healthy cognition group had significantly greater overall postural stability than the impaired cognition group (0.6 ± 0.1 vs. 1.1 ± 0.1, p = 0.003), and the low executive function group had significantly greater mediolateral postural stability than the impaired cognition group (0.2 ± 0.1 vs. 0.6 ± 0.6, p = 0.012). The low executive function group had fewer mistakes on the sentence recognition test than the cognitively impaired (2.2 ± 3.6 vs. 5.9 ± 6.4, p = 0.005). There were no significant differences in visual capacity, however, the low executive function group displayed an overall greatest ability. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with low executive function showcased a lower walking pace, but their postural stability and sensory functions did not differ from those of the older adults with healthy cognition. The variables concluded as good cognitive status markers were (1) gait cadence for dividing cognitively healthy from the rest and (2) single limb support portion, mediolateral stability index, and the number of mistakes on the sentence recognition test for discerning between the low executive function and cognitive impairment groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9502571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95025712022-09-24 Changes in sensory, postural stability and gait functions depending on cognitive decline, and possible markers for detection of cognitive status Kostic, Emilija Kwak, Kiyoung Kim, Dongwook BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research BACKGROUND: Numerous people never receive a formal dementia diagnosis. This issue can be addressed by early detection systems that utilize alternative forms of classification, such as gait, balance, and sensory function parameters. In the present study, said functions were compared between older adults with healthy cognition, older adults with low executive function, and older adults with cognitive impairment, to determine which parameters can be used to distinguish these groups. RESULTS: A group of cognitively healthy older men was found to have a significantly greater gait cadence than both the low executive function group (113.1 ± 6.8 vs. 108.0 ± 6.3 steps/min, p = 0.032) and the cognitively impaired group (113.1 ± 6.8 vs. 107.1 ± 7.4 steps/min, p = 0.009). The group with low executive function was found to have more gait stability than the impaired cognition group, represented by the single limb support phase (39.7 ± 1.2 vs. 38.6 ± 1.3%, p = 0.027). Additionally, the healthy cognition group had significantly greater overall postural stability than the impaired cognition group (0.6 ± 0.1 vs. 1.1 ± 0.1, p = 0.003), and the low executive function group had significantly greater mediolateral postural stability than the impaired cognition group (0.2 ± 0.1 vs. 0.6 ± 0.6, p = 0.012). The low executive function group had fewer mistakes on the sentence recognition test than the cognitively impaired (2.2 ± 3.6 vs. 5.9 ± 6.4, p = 0.005). There were no significant differences in visual capacity, however, the low executive function group displayed an overall greatest ability. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with low executive function showcased a lower walking pace, but their postural stability and sensory functions did not differ from those of the older adults with healthy cognition. The variables concluded as good cognitive status markers were (1) gait cadence for dividing cognitively healthy from the rest and (2) single limb support portion, mediolateral stability index, and the number of mistakes on the sentence recognition test for discerning between the low executive function and cognitive impairment groups. BioMed Central 2022-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9502571/ /pubmed/36138459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01955-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kostic, Emilija
Kwak, Kiyoung
Kim, Dongwook
Changes in sensory, postural stability and gait functions depending on cognitive decline, and possible markers for detection of cognitive status
title Changes in sensory, postural stability and gait functions depending on cognitive decline, and possible markers for detection of cognitive status
title_full Changes in sensory, postural stability and gait functions depending on cognitive decline, and possible markers for detection of cognitive status
title_fullStr Changes in sensory, postural stability and gait functions depending on cognitive decline, and possible markers for detection of cognitive status
title_full_unstemmed Changes in sensory, postural stability and gait functions depending on cognitive decline, and possible markers for detection of cognitive status
title_short Changes in sensory, postural stability and gait functions depending on cognitive decline, and possible markers for detection of cognitive status
title_sort changes in sensory, postural stability and gait functions depending on cognitive decline, and possible markers for detection of cognitive status
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01955-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kosticemilija changesinsensoryposturalstabilityandgaitfunctionsdependingoncognitivedeclineandpossiblemarkersfordetectionofcognitivestatus
AT kwakkiyoung changesinsensoryposturalstabilityandgaitfunctionsdependingoncognitivedeclineandpossiblemarkersfordetectionofcognitivestatus
AT kimdongwook changesinsensoryposturalstabilityandgaitfunctionsdependingoncognitivedeclineandpossiblemarkersfordetectionofcognitivestatus