Cargando…

Cup orientation following posterior approach THA – the effect of different visual aids and pelvic supports

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to compare cup inclination achieved (1) Using two orientation guides, whilst using the same 3-point pelvic positioner and (2) Using two types of pelvic positioners, whilst measuring intra-operative cup inclination with an inclinometer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Innmann, Moritz M., Verhaegen, Jeroen, Merle, Christian, Beaulé, Paul E., Meermans, Geert, Grammatopoulos, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05820-w
_version_ 1784795740436955136
author Innmann, Moritz M.
Verhaegen, Jeroen
Merle, Christian
Beaulé, Paul E.
Meermans, Geert
Grammatopoulos, George
author_facet Innmann, Moritz M.
Verhaegen, Jeroen
Merle, Christian
Beaulé, Paul E.
Meermans, Geert
Grammatopoulos, George
author_sort Innmann, Moritz M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study aims to compare cup inclination achieved (1) Using two orientation guides, whilst using the same 3-point pelvic positioner and (2) Using two types of pelvic positioners, whilst measuring intra-operative cup inclination with an inclinometer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective, diagnostic cohort study of a consecutive series of 150 THAs performed through a posterior approach. Two types of 3-point pelvic positioners were used (Stulberg and modified Capello Hip Positioners) and the cup was positioned freehand using one of two orientation guides (mechanical guide or digital inclinometer). Intra-operative inclination was recorded, radiographic cup inclination and anteversion were measured from radiographs. The differences in inclination due to pelvic position (ΔPelvicPosition) and orientation definitions (ΔDefinition) were calculated. Target radiographic inclination and anteversion was 40/20° ± 10°. RESULTS: There was no difference in radiographic cup inclination/ (p = 0.63) using a mechanical guide or digital inclinometer. However, differences were seen in ΔPelvicPosition between the positioners ((Stulberg: 0° ± 5 vs. Capello: 3° ± 6); p = 0.011). Intra-operative inclination at implantation was different between positioners and this led to equivalent cases within inclination/anteversion targets (Stulberg:84%, Capello:80%; p = 0.48). CONCLUSIONS: With the pelvis securely positioned with 3-point supports, optimum cup orientation can be achieved with both alignment guides and inclinometer. Non-optimal cup inclinations were seen when intra-operative inclinations were above 40° and below 32°, or the ΔPelvicPosition was excessive (> 15°; n = 2). We would thus recommend that the intra-operative cup inclination should be centered strictly between 30° and 35° relative to the floor. Small differences exist between different type of pelvic positioners that surgeons need to be aware off and account for.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9502576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95025762022-09-24 Cup orientation following posterior approach THA – the effect of different visual aids and pelvic supports Innmann, Moritz M. Verhaegen, Jeroen Merle, Christian Beaulé, Paul E. Meermans, Geert Grammatopoulos, George BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research INTRODUCTION: This study aims to compare cup inclination achieved (1) Using two orientation guides, whilst using the same 3-point pelvic positioner and (2) Using two types of pelvic positioners, whilst measuring intra-operative cup inclination with an inclinometer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective, diagnostic cohort study of a consecutive series of 150 THAs performed through a posterior approach. Two types of 3-point pelvic positioners were used (Stulberg and modified Capello Hip Positioners) and the cup was positioned freehand using one of two orientation guides (mechanical guide or digital inclinometer). Intra-operative inclination was recorded, radiographic cup inclination and anteversion were measured from radiographs. The differences in inclination due to pelvic position (ΔPelvicPosition) and orientation definitions (ΔDefinition) were calculated. Target radiographic inclination and anteversion was 40/20° ± 10°. RESULTS: There was no difference in radiographic cup inclination/ (p = 0.63) using a mechanical guide or digital inclinometer. However, differences were seen in ΔPelvicPosition between the positioners ((Stulberg: 0° ± 5 vs. Capello: 3° ± 6); p = 0.011). Intra-operative inclination at implantation was different between positioners and this led to equivalent cases within inclination/anteversion targets (Stulberg:84%, Capello:80%; p = 0.48). CONCLUSIONS: With the pelvis securely positioned with 3-point supports, optimum cup orientation can be achieved with both alignment guides and inclinometer. Non-optimal cup inclinations were seen when intra-operative inclinations were above 40° and below 32°, or the ΔPelvicPosition was excessive (> 15°; n = 2). We would thus recommend that the intra-operative cup inclination should be centered strictly between 30° and 35° relative to the floor. Small differences exist between different type of pelvic positioners that surgeons need to be aware off and account for. BioMed Central 2022-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9502576/ /pubmed/36138377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05820-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Innmann, Moritz M.
Verhaegen, Jeroen
Merle, Christian
Beaulé, Paul E.
Meermans, Geert
Grammatopoulos, George
Cup orientation following posterior approach THA – the effect of different visual aids and pelvic supports
title Cup orientation following posterior approach THA – the effect of different visual aids and pelvic supports
title_full Cup orientation following posterior approach THA – the effect of different visual aids and pelvic supports
title_fullStr Cup orientation following posterior approach THA – the effect of different visual aids and pelvic supports
title_full_unstemmed Cup orientation following posterior approach THA – the effect of different visual aids and pelvic supports
title_short Cup orientation following posterior approach THA – the effect of different visual aids and pelvic supports
title_sort cup orientation following posterior approach tha – the effect of different visual aids and pelvic supports
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05820-w
work_keys_str_mv AT innmannmoritzm cuporientationfollowingposteriorapproachthatheeffectofdifferentvisualaidsandpelvicsupports
AT verhaegenjeroen cuporientationfollowingposteriorapproachthatheeffectofdifferentvisualaidsandpelvicsupports
AT merlechristian cuporientationfollowingposteriorapproachthatheeffectofdifferentvisualaidsandpelvicsupports
AT beaulepaule cuporientationfollowingposteriorapproachthatheeffectofdifferentvisualaidsandpelvicsupports
AT meermansgeert cuporientationfollowingposteriorapproachthatheeffectofdifferentvisualaidsandpelvicsupports
AT grammatopoulosgeorge cuporientationfollowingposteriorapproachthatheeffectofdifferentvisualaidsandpelvicsupports