Cargando…
A Comparison of the Reliability of Five Sleep Questionnaires for the Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea
The aim of this study was to compare the reliability of five sleep questionnaires in detecting the occurrence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The study was conducted on a group of 201 patients. The patients completed five sleep questionnaires: the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), the STOP-Bang ques...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502623/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143452 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12091416 |
_version_ | 1784795752315224064 |
---|---|
author | Solecka, Šárka Matler, Karel Kostlivý, Tomáš Kubec, Vojtěch Tomášková, Hana Betka, Jaroslav |
author_facet | Solecka, Šárka Matler, Karel Kostlivý, Tomáš Kubec, Vojtěch Tomášková, Hana Betka, Jaroslav |
author_sort | Solecka, Šárka |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to compare the reliability of five sleep questionnaires in detecting the occurrence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The study was conducted on a group of 201 patients. The patients completed five sleep questionnaires: the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), the STOP-Bang questionnaire, the STOP questionnaire, the Berlin questionnaire (BQ) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Subsequently, the patients were examined using limited polygraphy, and the sensitivity and specificity of the questionnaires were evaluated. The STOP-Bang, Berlin and STOP questionnaires had the highest sensitivity for OSA detection (81.6%, 78.7%, and 74.2%, respectively), while the sensitivities of PSQI and ESS were low (50.8% and 34.5%). The ESS, STOP-Bang, STOP and Berlin questionnaires had the highest specificity (82.6%, 75%, 61.9%, and 61.9%). In our sample, we found the STOP-Bang and Berlin questionnaires to be the most suitable for OSA screening with the highest sensitivities (81.6%, 78.7%) and satisfactory specificities (75%, 61.9%). The STOP questionnaire was also relatively reliable, especially given its time-saving nature; though short, it preserved satisfactory sensitivity (74.2%) and specificity (61.9%). The ESS and PSQI were unsuitable for OSA screening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9502623 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95026232022-09-24 A Comparison of the Reliability of Five Sleep Questionnaires for the Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Solecka, Šárka Matler, Karel Kostlivý, Tomáš Kubec, Vojtěch Tomášková, Hana Betka, Jaroslav Life (Basel) Article The aim of this study was to compare the reliability of five sleep questionnaires in detecting the occurrence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The study was conducted on a group of 201 patients. The patients completed five sleep questionnaires: the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), the STOP-Bang questionnaire, the STOP questionnaire, the Berlin questionnaire (BQ) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Subsequently, the patients were examined using limited polygraphy, and the sensitivity and specificity of the questionnaires were evaluated. The STOP-Bang, Berlin and STOP questionnaires had the highest sensitivity for OSA detection (81.6%, 78.7%, and 74.2%, respectively), while the sensitivities of PSQI and ESS were low (50.8% and 34.5%). The ESS, STOP-Bang, STOP and Berlin questionnaires had the highest specificity (82.6%, 75%, 61.9%, and 61.9%). In our sample, we found the STOP-Bang and Berlin questionnaires to be the most suitable for OSA screening with the highest sensitivities (81.6%, 78.7%) and satisfactory specificities (75%, 61.9%). The STOP questionnaire was also relatively reliable, especially given its time-saving nature; though short, it preserved satisfactory sensitivity (74.2%) and specificity (61.9%). The ESS and PSQI were unsuitable for OSA screening. MDPI 2022-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9502623/ /pubmed/36143452 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12091416 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Solecka, Šárka Matler, Karel Kostlivý, Tomáš Kubec, Vojtěch Tomášková, Hana Betka, Jaroslav A Comparison of the Reliability of Five Sleep Questionnaires for the Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea |
title | A Comparison of the Reliability of Five Sleep Questionnaires for the Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea |
title_full | A Comparison of the Reliability of Five Sleep Questionnaires for the Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of the Reliability of Five Sleep Questionnaires for the Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of the Reliability of Five Sleep Questionnaires for the Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea |
title_short | A Comparison of the Reliability of Five Sleep Questionnaires for the Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea |
title_sort | comparison of the reliability of five sleep questionnaires for the detection of obstructive sleep apnea |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502623/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143452 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12091416 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soleckasarka acomparisonofthereliabilityoffivesleepquestionnairesforthedetectionofobstructivesleepapnea AT matlerkarel acomparisonofthereliabilityoffivesleepquestionnairesforthedetectionofobstructivesleepapnea AT kostlivytomas acomparisonofthereliabilityoffivesleepquestionnairesforthedetectionofobstructivesleepapnea AT kubecvojtech acomparisonofthereliabilityoffivesleepquestionnairesforthedetectionofobstructivesleepapnea AT tomaskovahana acomparisonofthereliabilityoffivesleepquestionnairesforthedetectionofobstructivesleepapnea AT betkajaroslav acomparisonofthereliabilityoffivesleepquestionnairesforthedetectionofobstructivesleepapnea AT soleckasarka comparisonofthereliabilityoffivesleepquestionnairesforthedetectionofobstructivesleepapnea AT matlerkarel comparisonofthereliabilityoffivesleepquestionnairesforthedetectionofobstructivesleepapnea AT kostlivytomas comparisonofthereliabilityoffivesleepquestionnairesforthedetectionofobstructivesleepapnea AT kubecvojtech comparisonofthereliabilityoffivesleepquestionnairesforthedetectionofobstructivesleepapnea AT tomaskovahana comparisonofthereliabilityoffivesleepquestionnairesforthedetectionofobstructivesleepapnea AT betkajaroslav comparisonofthereliabilityoffivesleepquestionnairesforthedetectionofobstructivesleepapnea |