Cargando…
Comparison of 2D and 3D Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation (PEO)-Based Coating Porosity Data Obtained by X-ray Tomography Rendering and a Classical Metallographic Approach
In this work, the porosity of plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO)-based coatings on Al- and Mg-based substrates was studied by two imaging techniques—namely, SEM and computer microtomography. Two approaches for porosity determination were chosen; relatively simple and fast SEM surface and cross-sect...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143626 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15186315 |
_version_ | 1784795772627189760 |
---|---|
author | Karlova, Polina Serdechnova, Maria Blawert, Carsten Lu, Xiaopeng Mohedano, Marta Tolnai, Domonkos Zeller-Plumhoff, Berit Zheludkevich, Mikhail L. |
author_facet | Karlova, Polina Serdechnova, Maria Blawert, Carsten Lu, Xiaopeng Mohedano, Marta Tolnai, Domonkos Zeller-Plumhoff, Berit Zheludkevich, Mikhail L. |
author_sort | Karlova, Polina |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this work, the porosity of plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO)-based coatings on Al- and Mg-based substrates was studied by two imaging techniques—namely, SEM and computer microtomography. Two approaches for porosity determination were chosen; relatively simple and fast SEM surface and cross-sectional imaging was compared with X-ray micro computed tomography (microCT) rendering. Differences between 2D and 3D porosity were demonstrated and explained. A more compact PEO coating was found on the Al substrate, with a lower porosity compared to Mg substrates under the same processing parameters. Furthermore, huge pore clusters were detected with microCT. Overall, 2D surface porosity calculations did not show sufficient accuracy for them to become the recommended method for the exact evaluation of the porosity of PEO coatings; microCT is a more appropriate method for porosity evaluation compared to SEM imaging. Moreover, the advantage of 3D microCT images clearly lies in the detection of closed and open porosity, which are important for coating properties. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9502706 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95027062022-09-24 Comparison of 2D and 3D Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation (PEO)-Based Coating Porosity Data Obtained by X-ray Tomography Rendering and a Classical Metallographic Approach Karlova, Polina Serdechnova, Maria Blawert, Carsten Lu, Xiaopeng Mohedano, Marta Tolnai, Domonkos Zeller-Plumhoff, Berit Zheludkevich, Mikhail L. Materials (Basel) Article In this work, the porosity of plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO)-based coatings on Al- and Mg-based substrates was studied by two imaging techniques—namely, SEM and computer microtomography. Two approaches for porosity determination were chosen; relatively simple and fast SEM surface and cross-sectional imaging was compared with X-ray micro computed tomography (microCT) rendering. Differences between 2D and 3D porosity were demonstrated and explained. A more compact PEO coating was found on the Al substrate, with a lower porosity compared to Mg substrates under the same processing parameters. Furthermore, huge pore clusters were detected with microCT. Overall, 2D surface porosity calculations did not show sufficient accuracy for them to become the recommended method for the exact evaluation of the porosity of PEO coatings; microCT is a more appropriate method for porosity evaluation compared to SEM imaging. Moreover, the advantage of 3D microCT images clearly lies in the detection of closed and open porosity, which are important for coating properties. MDPI 2022-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9502706/ /pubmed/36143626 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15186315 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Karlova, Polina Serdechnova, Maria Blawert, Carsten Lu, Xiaopeng Mohedano, Marta Tolnai, Domonkos Zeller-Plumhoff, Berit Zheludkevich, Mikhail L. Comparison of 2D and 3D Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation (PEO)-Based Coating Porosity Data Obtained by X-ray Tomography Rendering and a Classical Metallographic Approach |
title | Comparison of 2D and 3D Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation (PEO)-Based Coating Porosity Data Obtained by X-ray Tomography Rendering and a Classical Metallographic Approach |
title_full | Comparison of 2D and 3D Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation (PEO)-Based Coating Porosity Data Obtained by X-ray Tomography Rendering and a Classical Metallographic Approach |
title_fullStr | Comparison of 2D and 3D Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation (PEO)-Based Coating Porosity Data Obtained by X-ray Tomography Rendering and a Classical Metallographic Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of 2D and 3D Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation (PEO)-Based Coating Porosity Data Obtained by X-ray Tomography Rendering and a Classical Metallographic Approach |
title_short | Comparison of 2D and 3D Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation (PEO)-Based Coating Porosity Data Obtained by X-ray Tomography Rendering and a Classical Metallographic Approach |
title_sort | comparison of 2d and 3d plasma electrolytic oxidation (peo)-based coating porosity data obtained by x-ray tomography rendering and a classical metallographic approach |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143626 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15186315 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karlovapolina comparisonof2dand3dplasmaelectrolyticoxidationpeobasedcoatingporositydataobtainedbyxraytomographyrenderingandaclassicalmetallographicapproach AT serdechnovamaria comparisonof2dand3dplasmaelectrolyticoxidationpeobasedcoatingporositydataobtainedbyxraytomographyrenderingandaclassicalmetallographicapproach AT blawertcarsten comparisonof2dand3dplasmaelectrolyticoxidationpeobasedcoatingporositydataobtainedbyxraytomographyrenderingandaclassicalmetallographicapproach AT luxiaopeng comparisonof2dand3dplasmaelectrolyticoxidationpeobasedcoatingporositydataobtainedbyxraytomographyrenderingandaclassicalmetallographicapproach AT mohedanomarta comparisonof2dand3dplasmaelectrolyticoxidationpeobasedcoatingporositydataobtainedbyxraytomographyrenderingandaclassicalmetallographicapproach AT tolnaidomonkos comparisonof2dand3dplasmaelectrolyticoxidationpeobasedcoatingporositydataobtainedbyxraytomographyrenderingandaclassicalmetallographicapproach AT zellerplumhoffberit comparisonof2dand3dplasmaelectrolyticoxidationpeobasedcoatingporositydataobtainedbyxraytomographyrenderingandaclassicalmetallographicapproach AT zheludkevichmikhaill comparisonof2dand3dplasmaelectrolyticoxidationpeobasedcoatingporositydataobtainedbyxraytomographyrenderingandaclassicalmetallographicapproach |