Cargando…

Comparison of Various Antimicrobial Agents for Thermoplastic Polymeric Retainers

The thermoplastic retainers indicated a rising incidence of cariogenic bacteria such as Streptococcus mutans. A report suggested the case of a patient with severe gingival inflammation and dental caries as a result of inadequate appliance cleaning. This study aims to compare the various antimicrobia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiatwarawut, Kanket, Kuvatanasuchati, Jintakorn, Thaweboon, Boonyanit, Sirisoontorn, Irin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36145897
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14183753
_version_ 1784795786558570496
author Kiatwarawut, Kanket
Kuvatanasuchati, Jintakorn
Thaweboon, Boonyanit
Sirisoontorn, Irin
author_facet Kiatwarawut, Kanket
Kuvatanasuchati, Jintakorn
Thaweboon, Boonyanit
Sirisoontorn, Irin
author_sort Kiatwarawut, Kanket
collection PubMed
description The thermoplastic retainers indicated a rising incidence of cariogenic bacteria such as Streptococcus mutans. A report suggested the case of a patient with severe gingival inflammation and dental caries as a result of inadequate appliance cleaning. This study aims to compare the various antimicrobial agents for thermoplastic polymeric retainers. A minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of acetic acid was determined. Streptococcus mutans biofilm was formed on punched 4-mm copolyester (Essix ACE(®)) and polyurethane (Vivera(®)) retainers after they were submerged in 0.12% chlorhexidine (CHX group), acetic acid (AA group), Polident Denture Cleanser(®) (PD group), and Polident Pro Guard & Retainer(®) (PR group). A crystal violet (CV) test was performed. The biofilm imaging was assessed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The results showed that all chemical disinfectants exhibited statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) compared to the positive control. This novel finding elucidated that 0.625% acetic acid is effective for antimicrobial in both copolyester and polyurethane retainers. However, only the CHX, PD, and PR groups could reduce biofilm mass. In addition, the CV assay cannot provide information about the actual number of living and dead bacteria. Furthermore, the LIVE/DEAD BacLight assay was able to show the bacterial viability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9502766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95027662022-09-24 Comparison of Various Antimicrobial Agents for Thermoplastic Polymeric Retainers Kiatwarawut, Kanket Kuvatanasuchati, Jintakorn Thaweboon, Boonyanit Sirisoontorn, Irin Polymers (Basel) Article The thermoplastic retainers indicated a rising incidence of cariogenic bacteria such as Streptococcus mutans. A report suggested the case of a patient with severe gingival inflammation and dental caries as a result of inadequate appliance cleaning. This study aims to compare the various antimicrobial agents for thermoplastic polymeric retainers. A minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of acetic acid was determined. Streptococcus mutans biofilm was formed on punched 4-mm copolyester (Essix ACE(®)) and polyurethane (Vivera(®)) retainers after they were submerged in 0.12% chlorhexidine (CHX group), acetic acid (AA group), Polident Denture Cleanser(®) (PD group), and Polident Pro Guard & Retainer(®) (PR group). A crystal violet (CV) test was performed. The biofilm imaging was assessed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The results showed that all chemical disinfectants exhibited statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) compared to the positive control. This novel finding elucidated that 0.625% acetic acid is effective for antimicrobial in both copolyester and polyurethane retainers. However, only the CHX, PD, and PR groups could reduce biofilm mass. In addition, the CV assay cannot provide information about the actual number of living and dead bacteria. Furthermore, the LIVE/DEAD BacLight assay was able to show the bacterial viability. MDPI 2022-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9502766/ /pubmed/36145897 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14183753 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kiatwarawut, Kanket
Kuvatanasuchati, Jintakorn
Thaweboon, Boonyanit
Sirisoontorn, Irin
Comparison of Various Antimicrobial Agents for Thermoplastic Polymeric Retainers
title Comparison of Various Antimicrobial Agents for Thermoplastic Polymeric Retainers
title_full Comparison of Various Antimicrobial Agents for Thermoplastic Polymeric Retainers
title_fullStr Comparison of Various Antimicrobial Agents for Thermoplastic Polymeric Retainers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Various Antimicrobial Agents for Thermoplastic Polymeric Retainers
title_short Comparison of Various Antimicrobial Agents for Thermoplastic Polymeric Retainers
title_sort comparison of various antimicrobial agents for thermoplastic polymeric retainers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36145897
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14183753
work_keys_str_mv AT kiatwarawutkanket comparisonofvariousantimicrobialagentsforthermoplasticpolymericretainers
AT kuvatanasuchatijintakorn comparisonofvariousantimicrobialagentsforthermoplasticpolymericretainers
AT thaweboonboonyanit comparisonofvariousantimicrobialagentsforthermoplasticpolymericretainers
AT sirisoontornirin comparisonofvariousantimicrobialagentsforthermoplasticpolymericretainers