Cargando…

Application of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure for Prehospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Introduction: Communication and teamwork are critical for ensuring patient safety, particularly during prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) is a tool applicable to such situations. This study aimed to validate the TEAM efficiency as a suitable...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Sangsoo, Park, Hye Ji, Jeong, Won Jung, Kim, Gi Woon, Choi, Han Joo, Moon, Hyung Jun, Lee, Kyoungmi, Choi, Hyuk Joong, Park, Yong Jin, Cho, Jin Seong, Lee, Choung Ah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143045
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185390
_version_ 1784795787815813120
author Han, Sangsoo
Park, Hye Ji
Jeong, Won Jung
Kim, Gi Woon
Choi, Han Joo
Moon, Hyung Jun
Lee, Kyoungmi
Choi, Hyuk Joong
Park, Yong Jin
Cho, Jin Seong
Lee, Choung Ah
author_facet Han, Sangsoo
Park, Hye Ji
Jeong, Won Jung
Kim, Gi Woon
Choi, Han Joo
Moon, Hyung Jun
Lee, Kyoungmi
Choi, Hyuk Joong
Park, Yong Jin
Cho, Jin Seong
Lee, Choung Ah
author_sort Han, Sangsoo
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Communication and teamwork are critical for ensuring patient safety, particularly during prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) is a tool applicable to such situations. This study aimed to validate the TEAM efficiency as a suitable tool even in prehospital CPR. Methods: A multi-centric observational study was conducted using the data of all non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients aged over 18 years who were treated using video communication-based medical direction in 2018. From the extracted data of 1494 eligible patients, 67 sample cases were randomly selected. Two experienced raters were assigned to each case. Each rater reviewed 13 or 14 videos and scored the TEAM items for each field cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance. The internal consistency, concurrent validity, and inter-rater reliability were measured. Results: The TEAM showed high reliability with a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.939, with a mean interitem correlation of 0.584. The mean item–total correlation was 0.789, indicating significant associations. The mean correlation coefficient between each item and the global score range was 0.682, indicating good concurrent validity. The mean intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.804, indicating excellent agreement. Discussion: The TEAM can be a valid and reliable tool to evaluate the non-technical skills of a team of paramedics performing CPR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9502771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95027712022-09-24 Application of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure for Prehospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Han, Sangsoo Park, Hye Ji Jeong, Won Jung Kim, Gi Woon Choi, Han Joo Moon, Hyung Jun Lee, Kyoungmi Choi, Hyuk Joong Park, Yong Jin Cho, Jin Seong Lee, Choung Ah J Clin Med Article Introduction: Communication and teamwork are critical for ensuring patient safety, particularly during prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) is a tool applicable to such situations. This study aimed to validate the TEAM efficiency as a suitable tool even in prehospital CPR. Methods: A multi-centric observational study was conducted using the data of all non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients aged over 18 years who were treated using video communication-based medical direction in 2018. From the extracted data of 1494 eligible patients, 67 sample cases were randomly selected. Two experienced raters were assigned to each case. Each rater reviewed 13 or 14 videos and scored the TEAM items for each field cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance. The internal consistency, concurrent validity, and inter-rater reliability were measured. Results: The TEAM showed high reliability with a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.939, with a mean interitem correlation of 0.584. The mean item–total correlation was 0.789, indicating significant associations. The mean correlation coefficient between each item and the global score range was 0.682, indicating good concurrent validity. The mean intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.804, indicating excellent agreement. Discussion: The TEAM can be a valid and reliable tool to evaluate the non-technical skills of a team of paramedics performing CPR. MDPI 2022-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9502771/ /pubmed/36143045 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185390 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Han, Sangsoo
Park, Hye Ji
Jeong, Won Jung
Kim, Gi Woon
Choi, Han Joo
Moon, Hyung Jun
Lee, Kyoungmi
Choi, Hyuk Joong
Park, Yong Jin
Cho, Jin Seong
Lee, Choung Ah
Application of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure for Prehospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
title Application of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure for Prehospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
title_full Application of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure for Prehospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
title_fullStr Application of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure for Prehospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
title_full_unstemmed Application of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure for Prehospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
title_short Application of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure for Prehospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
title_sort application of the team emergency assessment measure for prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143045
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185390
work_keys_str_mv AT hansangsoo applicationoftheteamemergencyassessmentmeasureforprehospitalcardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT parkhyeji applicationoftheteamemergencyassessmentmeasureforprehospitalcardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT jeongwonjung applicationoftheteamemergencyassessmentmeasureforprehospitalcardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT kimgiwoon applicationoftheteamemergencyassessmentmeasureforprehospitalcardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT choihanjoo applicationoftheteamemergencyassessmentmeasureforprehospitalcardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT moonhyungjun applicationoftheteamemergencyassessmentmeasureforprehospitalcardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT leekyoungmi applicationoftheteamemergencyassessmentmeasureforprehospitalcardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT choihyukjoong applicationoftheteamemergencyassessmentmeasureforprehospitalcardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT parkyongjin applicationoftheteamemergencyassessmentmeasureforprehospitalcardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT chojinseong applicationoftheteamemergencyassessmentmeasureforprehospitalcardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT leechoungah applicationoftheteamemergencyassessmentmeasureforprehospitalcardiopulmonaryresuscitation