Cargando…

Insignificant Difference in Biocompatibility of Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Ternary Reagent Compared with Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Lithium Bromide

Bombyx mori silk fibroin (SF) is widely used in the field of biomaterials due to its excellent biocompatibility and mechanical properties. However, SF cannot be used directly in many applications and needs to be dissolved first. Lithium bromide (LiBr) is a traditional solvent which is usually used t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Guotao, Wang, Xin, Wu, Mengqiu, Wu, Siyuan, Cheng, Lan, Zhang, Xiaoning, Dai, Fangyin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36146047
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14183903
_version_ 1784795799652139008
author Cheng, Guotao
Wang, Xin
Wu, Mengqiu
Wu, Siyuan
Cheng, Lan
Zhang, Xiaoning
Dai, Fangyin
author_facet Cheng, Guotao
Wang, Xin
Wu, Mengqiu
Wu, Siyuan
Cheng, Lan
Zhang, Xiaoning
Dai, Fangyin
author_sort Cheng, Guotao
collection PubMed
description Bombyx mori silk fibroin (SF) is widely used in the field of biomaterials due to its excellent biocompatibility and mechanical properties. However, SF cannot be used directly in many applications and needs to be dissolved first. Lithium bromide (LiBr) is a traditional solvent which is usually used to dissolve SF. However, LiBr has several limitations, e.g., it is expensive, it is toxic to organisms, and it is environmentally unfriendly. Herein, we investigate the possibility of developing a ternary reagent system that is inexpensive, non-toxic to organisms, and environmentally friendly as an alternative for silk fibroin solubilization. The results confirm that regenerated silk fibroin (RSF) prepared using a ternary reagent has the same morphology and amino acid composition as that prepared using LiBr, but the RSF prepared using a ternary reagent still had a small amount of calcium residue even after long-term dialysis. Further research found that the residual calcium does not cause significant differences in the structure and biological performance of the RSF, such as its cytotoxicity, blood compatibility, and antibacterial properties. Therefore, we believe that ternary reagents are an ideal alternative solvent for dissolving SF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9502819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95028192022-09-24 Insignificant Difference in Biocompatibility of Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Ternary Reagent Compared with Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Lithium Bromide Cheng, Guotao Wang, Xin Wu, Mengqiu Wu, Siyuan Cheng, Lan Zhang, Xiaoning Dai, Fangyin Polymers (Basel) Article Bombyx mori silk fibroin (SF) is widely used in the field of biomaterials due to its excellent biocompatibility and mechanical properties. However, SF cannot be used directly in many applications and needs to be dissolved first. Lithium bromide (LiBr) is a traditional solvent which is usually used to dissolve SF. However, LiBr has several limitations, e.g., it is expensive, it is toxic to organisms, and it is environmentally unfriendly. Herein, we investigate the possibility of developing a ternary reagent system that is inexpensive, non-toxic to organisms, and environmentally friendly as an alternative for silk fibroin solubilization. The results confirm that regenerated silk fibroin (RSF) prepared using a ternary reagent has the same morphology and amino acid composition as that prepared using LiBr, but the RSF prepared using a ternary reagent still had a small amount of calcium residue even after long-term dialysis. Further research found that the residual calcium does not cause significant differences in the structure and biological performance of the RSF, such as its cytotoxicity, blood compatibility, and antibacterial properties. Therefore, we believe that ternary reagents are an ideal alternative solvent for dissolving SF. MDPI 2022-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9502819/ /pubmed/36146047 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14183903 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cheng, Guotao
Wang, Xin
Wu, Mengqiu
Wu, Siyuan
Cheng, Lan
Zhang, Xiaoning
Dai, Fangyin
Insignificant Difference in Biocompatibility of Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Ternary Reagent Compared with Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Lithium Bromide
title Insignificant Difference in Biocompatibility of Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Ternary Reagent Compared with Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Lithium Bromide
title_full Insignificant Difference in Biocompatibility of Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Ternary Reagent Compared with Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Lithium Bromide
title_fullStr Insignificant Difference in Biocompatibility of Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Ternary Reagent Compared with Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Lithium Bromide
title_full_unstemmed Insignificant Difference in Biocompatibility of Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Ternary Reagent Compared with Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Lithium Bromide
title_short Insignificant Difference in Biocompatibility of Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Ternary Reagent Compared with Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Lithium Bromide
title_sort insignificant difference in biocompatibility of regenerated silk fibroin prepared with ternary reagent compared with regenerated silk fibroin prepared with lithium bromide
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36146047
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14183903
work_keys_str_mv AT chengguotao insignificantdifferenceinbiocompatibilityofregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithternaryreagentcomparedwithregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithlithiumbromide
AT wangxin insignificantdifferenceinbiocompatibilityofregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithternaryreagentcomparedwithregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithlithiumbromide
AT wumengqiu insignificantdifferenceinbiocompatibilityofregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithternaryreagentcomparedwithregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithlithiumbromide
AT wusiyuan insignificantdifferenceinbiocompatibilityofregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithternaryreagentcomparedwithregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithlithiumbromide
AT chenglan insignificantdifferenceinbiocompatibilityofregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithternaryreagentcomparedwithregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithlithiumbromide
AT zhangxiaoning insignificantdifferenceinbiocompatibilityofregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithternaryreagentcomparedwithregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithlithiumbromide
AT daifangyin insignificantdifferenceinbiocompatibilityofregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithternaryreagentcomparedwithregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithlithiumbromide