Cargando…
Insignificant Difference in Biocompatibility of Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Ternary Reagent Compared with Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Lithium Bromide
Bombyx mori silk fibroin (SF) is widely used in the field of biomaterials due to its excellent biocompatibility and mechanical properties. However, SF cannot be used directly in many applications and needs to be dissolved first. Lithium bromide (LiBr) is a traditional solvent which is usually used t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36146047 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14183903 |
_version_ | 1784795799652139008 |
---|---|
author | Cheng, Guotao Wang, Xin Wu, Mengqiu Wu, Siyuan Cheng, Lan Zhang, Xiaoning Dai, Fangyin |
author_facet | Cheng, Guotao Wang, Xin Wu, Mengqiu Wu, Siyuan Cheng, Lan Zhang, Xiaoning Dai, Fangyin |
author_sort | Cheng, Guotao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bombyx mori silk fibroin (SF) is widely used in the field of biomaterials due to its excellent biocompatibility and mechanical properties. However, SF cannot be used directly in many applications and needs to be dissolved first. Lithium bromide (LiBr) is a traditional solvent which is usually used to dissolve SF. However, LiBr has several limitations, e.g., it is expensive, it is toxic to organisms, and it is environmentally unfriendly. Herein, we investigate the possibility of developing a ternary reagent system that is inexpensive, non-toxic to organisms, and environmentally friendly as an alternative for silk fibroin solubilization. The results confirm that regenerated silk fibroin (RSF) prepared using a ternary reagent has the same morphology and amino acid composition as that prepared using LiBr, but the RSF prepared using a ternary reagent still had a small amount of calcium residue even after long-term dialysis. Further research found that the residual calcium does not cause significant differences in the structure and biological performance of the RSF, such as its cytotoxicity, blood compatibility, and antibacterial properties. Therefore, we believe that ternary reagents are an ideal alternative solvent for dissolving SF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9502819 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95028192022-09-24 Insignificant Difference in Biocompatibility of Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Ternary Reagent Compared with Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Lithium Bromide Cheng, Guotao Wang, Xin Wu, Mengqiu Wu, Siyuan Cheng, Lan Zhang, Xiaoning Dai, Fangyin Polymers (Basel) Article Bombyx mori silk fibroin (SF) is widely used in the field of biomaterials due to its excellent biocompatibility and mechanical properties. However, SF cannot be used directly in many applications and needs to be dissolved first. Lithium bromide (LiBr) is a traditional solvent which is usually used to dissolve SF. However, LiBr has several limitations, e.g., it is expensive, it is toxic to organisms, and it is environmentally unfriendly. Herein, we investigate the possibility of developing a ternary reagent system that is inexpensive, non-toxic to organisms, and environmentally friendly as an alternative for silk fibroin solubilization. The results confirm that regenerated silk fibroin (RSF) prepared using a ternary reagent has the same morphology and amino acid composition as that prepared using LiBr, but the RSF prepared using a ternary reagent still had a small amount of calcium residue even after long-term dialysis. Further research found that the residual calcium does not cause significant differences in the structure and biological performance of the RSF, such as its cytotoxicity, blood compatibility, and antibacterial properties. Therefore, we believe that ternary reagents are an ideal alternative solvent for dissolving SF. MDPI 2022-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9502819/ /pubmed/36146047 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14183903 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Cheng, Guotao Wang, Xin Wu, Mengqiu Wu, Siyuan Cheng, Lan Zhang, Xiaoning Dai, Fangyin Insignificant Difference in Biocompatibility of Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Ternary Reagent Compared with Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Lithium Bromide |
title | Insignificant Difference in Biocompatibility of Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Ternary Reagent Compared with Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Lithium Bromide |
title_full | Insignificant Difference in Biocompatibility of Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Ternary Reagent Compared with Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Lithium Bromide |
title_fullStr | Insignificant Difference in Biocompatibility of Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Ternary Reagent Compared with Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Lithium Bromide |
title_full_unstemmed | Insignificant Difference in Biocompatibility of Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Ternary Reagent Compared with Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Lithium Bromide |
title_short | Insignificant Difference in Biocompatibility of Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Ternary Reagent Compared with Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Lithium Bromide |
title_sort | insignificant difference in biocompatibility of regenerated silk fibroin prepared with ternary reagent compared with regenerated silk fibroin prepared with lithium bromide |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36146047 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14183903 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chengguotao insignificantdifferenceinbiocompatibilityofregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithternaryreagentcomparedwithregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithlithiumbromide AT wangxin insignificantdifferenceinbiocompatibilityofregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithternaryreagentcomparedwithregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithlithiumbromide AT wumengqiu insignificantdifferenceinbiocompatibilityofregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithternaryreagentcomparedwithregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithlithiumbromide AT wusiyuan insignificantdifferenceinbiocompatibilityofregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithternaryreagentcomparedwithregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithlithiumbromide AT chenglan insignificantdifferenceinbiocompatibilityofregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithternaryreagentcomparedwithregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithlithiumbromide AT zhangxiaoning insignificantdifferenceinbiocompatibilityofregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithternaryreagentcomparedwithregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithlithiumbromide AT daifangyin insignificantdifferenceinbiocompatibilityofregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithternaryreagentcomparedwithregeneratedsilkfibroinpreparedwithlithiumbromide |