Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of a whole-area testing pilot of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections with lateral flow devices: a modelling and economic analysis study

BACKGROUND: Mass community testing for SARS-CoV-2 by lateral flow devices (LFDs) aims to reduce prevalence in the community. However its effectiveness as a public heath intervention is disputed. METHOD: Data from a mass testing pilot in the Borough of Merthyr Tydfil in late 2020 was used to model ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drakesmith, Mark, Collins, Brendan, Jones, Angela, Nnoaham, Kelechi, Thomas, Daniel Rhys
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08511-3
_version_ 1784795816663187456
author Drakesmith, Mark
Collins, Brendan
Jones, Angela
Nnoaham, Kelechi
Thomas, Daniel Rhys
author_facet Drakesmith, Mark
Collins, Brendan
Jones, Angela
Nnoaham, Kelechi
Thomas, Daniel Rhys
author_sort Drakesmith, Mark
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mass community testing for SARS-CoV-2 by lateral flow devices (LFDs) aims to reduce prevalence in the community. However its effectiveness as a public heath intervention is disputed. METHOD: Data from a mass testing pilot in the Borough of Merthyr Tydfil in late 2020 was used to model cases, hospitalisations, ICU admissions and deaths prevented. Further economic analysis with a healthcare perspective assessed cost-effectiveness in terms of healthcare costs avoided and QALYs gained. RESULTS: An initial conservative estimate of 360 (95% CI: 311–418) cases were prevented by the mass testing, representing a would-be reduction of 11% of all cases diagnosed in Merthyr Tydfil residents during the same period. Modelling healthcare burden estimates that 24 (16—36) hospitalizations, 5 (3–6) ICU admissions and 15 (11–20) deaths were prevented, representing 6.37%, 11.1% and 8.2%, respectively of the actual counts during the same period. A less conservative, best-case scenario predicts 2333 (1764–3115) cases prevented, representing 80% reduction in would-be cases. Cost -effectiveness analysis indicates 108 (80–143) QALYs gained, an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £2,143 (£860-£4,175) per QALY gained and net monetary benefit of £6.2 m (£4.5 m-£8.4 m). In the best-case scenario, this increases to £15.9 m (£12.3 m-£20.5 m). CONCLUSIONS: A non-negligible number of cases, hospitalisations and deaths were prevented by the mass testing pilot. Considering QALYs gained and healthcare costs avoided, the pilot was cost-effective. These findings suggest mass testing with LFDs in areas of high prevalence (> 2%) is likely to provide significant public health benefit. It is not yet clear whether similar benefits will be obtained in low prevalence settings or with vaccination rollout. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08511-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9502892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95028922022-09-24 Cost-effectiveness of a whole-area testing pilot of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections with lateral flow devices: a modelling and economic analysis study Drakesmith, Mark Collins, Brendan Jones, Angela Nnoaham, Kelechi Thomas, Daniel Rhys BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Mass community testing for SARS-CoV-2 by lateral flow devices (LFDs) aims to reduce prevalence in the community. However its effectiveness as a public heath intervention is disputed. METHOD: Data from a mass testing pilot in the Borough of Merthyr Tydfil in late 2020 was used to model cases, hospitalisations, ICU admissions and deaths prevented. Further economic analysis with a healthcare perspective assessed cost-effectiveness in terms of healthcare costs avoided and QALYs gained. RESULTS: An initial conservative estimate of 360 (95% CI: 311–418) cases were prevented by the mass testing, representing a would-be reduction of 11% of all cases diagnosed in Merthyr Tydfil residents during the same period. Modelling healthcare burden estimates that 24 (16—36) hospitalizations, 5 (3–6) ICU admissions and 15 (11–20) deaths were prevented, representing 6.37%, 11.1% and 8.2%, respectively of the actual counts during the same period. A less conservative, best-case scenario predicts 2333 (1764–3115) cases prevented, representing 80% reduction in would-be cases. Cost -effectiveness analysis indicates 108 (80–143) QALYs gained, an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £2,143 (£860-£4,175) per QALY gained and net monetary benefit of £6.2 m (£4.5 m-£8.4 m). In the best-case scenario, this increases to £15.9 m (£12.3 m-£20.5 m). CONCLUSIONS: A non-negligible number of cases, hospitalisations and deaths were prevented by the mass testing pilot. Considering QALYs gained and healthcare costs avoided, the pilot was cost-effective. These findings suggest mass testing with LFDs in areas of high prevalence (> 2%) is likely to provide significant public health benefit. It is not yet clear whether similar benefits will be obtained in low prevalence settings or with vaccination rollout. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08511-3. BioMed Central 2022-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9502892/ /pubmed/36138455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08511-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Drakesmith, Mark
Collins, Brendan
Jones, Angela
Nnoaham, Kelechi
Thomas, Daniel Rhys
Cost-effectiveness of a whole-area testing pilot of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections with lateral flow devices: a modelling and economic analysis study
title Cost-effectiveness of a whole-area testing pilot of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections with lateral flow devices: a modelling and economic analysis study
title_full Cost-effectiveness of a whole-area testing pilot of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections with lateral flow devices: a modelling and economic analysis study
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of a whole-area testing pilot of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections with lateral flow devices: a modelling and economic analysis study
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of a whole-area testing pilot of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections with lateral flow devices: a modelling and economic analysis study
title_short Cost-effectiveness of a whole-area testing pilot of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections with lateral flow devices: a modelling and economic analysis study
title_sort cost-effectiveness of a whole-area testing pilot of asymptomatic sars-cov-2 infections with lateral flow devices: a modelling and economic analysis study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08511-3
work_keys_str_mv AT drakesmithmark costeffectivenessofawholeareatestingpilotofasymptomaticsarscov2infectionswithlateralflowdevicesamodellingandeconomicanalysisstudy
AT collinsbrendan costeffectivenessofawholeareatestingpilotofasymptomaticsarscov2infectionswithlateralflowdevicesamodellingandeconomicanalysisstudy
AT jonesangela costeffectivenessofawholeareatestingpilotofasymptomaticsarscov2infectionswithlateralflowdevicesamodellingandeconomicanalysisstudy
AT nnoahamkelechi costeffectivenessofawholeareatestingpilotofasymptomaticsarscov2infectionswithlateralflowdevicesamodellingandeconomicanalysisstudy
AT thomasdanielrhys costeffectivenessofawholeareatestingpilotofasymptomaticsarscov2infectionswithlateralflowdevicesamodellingandeconomicanalysisstudy