Cargando…

Pain perception following computer-controlled versus conventional dental anesthesia: randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The administration of local anesthesia (LA) in dental practice requires an injection which is the leading cause of patients’ fear and anxiety. Computer-controlled local anesthetic injector, designed to reduce the pain of performing local anesthesia by controlling the speed of injection....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Attia, Sameh, Austermann, Thomas, May, Andreas, Mekhemar, Mohamed, Conrad, Jonas, Knitschke, Michael, Böttger, Sebastian, Howaldt, Hans-Peter, Riad, Abanoub
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02454-1
_version_ 1784795831282434048
author Attia, Sameh
Austermann, Thomas
May, Andreas
Mekhemar, Mohamed
Conrad, Jonas
Knitschke, Michael
Böttger, Sebastian
Howaldt, Hans-Peter
Riad, Abanoub
author_facet Attia, Sameh
Austermann, Thomas
May, Andreas
Mekhemar, Mohamed
Conrad, Jonas
Knitschke, Michael
Böttger, Sebastian
Howaldt, Hans-Peter
Riad, Abanoub
author_sort Attia, Sameh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The administration of local anesthesia (LA) in dental practice requires an injection which is the leading cause of patients’ fear and anxiety. Computer-controlled local anesthetic injector, designed to reduce the pain of performing local anesthesia by controlling the speed of injection. This single-blind randomised control trial aimed to compare the pain perception after computer-controlled local anesthesia (CCLA) and conventional LA. METHODS: Dental students were both test and operator group versus an experienced dentist as additional operator of the LA. Data were collected regarding gender, age, medical condition, smoking habits. Additionally, operator feedback about the handling, pain at insertion and during infiltration, excitement (Dental Anxiety Scale), and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Out of the 60 included participants, the majority were females (n = 41; 68.3%), medically healthy (n = 54; 90%), and did not receive medications (n = 54; 90%). While the participating students administered 62 (51.7%) injections, the experienced dentist administered 58 (48.3%) injections. The difference in pain perception on puncture between CCLA and conventional injections was not statistically significant (Sig. = 0.285); however, pain perception during injection was significantly different (Sig. = 0.029) between CCLA (1.65 ± 1.93) and conventional injections (2.49 ± 2.31). CONCLUSION: The professional experience influenced the pain perception while applying the LA. CCLA did not reduce pain on puncture significantly; however, pain perception during the injection was significantly reduced in the case of using CCLA devices compared to the conventional syringe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9502910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95029102022-09-24 Pain perception following computer-controlled versus conventional dental anesthesia: randomized controlled trial Attia, Sameh Austermann, Thomas May, Andreas Mekhemar, Mohamed Conrad, Jonas Knitschke, Michael Böttger, Sebastian Howaldt, Hans-Peter Riad, Abanoub BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: The administration of local anesthesia (LA) in dental practice requires an injection which is the leading cause of patients’ fear and anxiety. Computer-controlled local anesthetic injector, designed to reduce the pain of performing local anesthesia by controlling the speed of injection. This single-blind randomised control trial aimed to compare the pain perception after computer-controlled local anesthesia (CCLA) and conventional LA. METHODS: Dental students were both test and operator group versus an experienced dentist as additional operator of the LA. Data were collected regarding gender, age, medical condition, smoking habits. Additionally, operator feedback about the handling, pain at insertion and during infiltration, excitement (Dental Anxiety Scale), and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Out of the 60 included participants, the majority were females (n = 41; 68.3%), medically healthy (n = 54; 90%), and did not receive medications (n = 54; 90%). While the participating students administered 62 (51.7%) injections, the experienced dentist administered 58 (48.3%) injections. The difference in pain perception on puncture between CCLA and conventional injections was not statistically significant (Sig. = 0.285); however, pain perception during injection was significantly different (Sig. = 0.029) between CCLA (1.65 ± 1.93) and conventional injections (2.49 ± 2.31). CONCLUSION: The professional experience influenced the pain perception while applying the LA. CCLA did not reduce pain on puncture significantly; however, pain perception during the injection was significantly reduced in the case of using CCLA devices compared to the conventional syringe. BioMed Central 2022-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9502910/ /pubmed/36138388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02454-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Attia, Sameh
Austermann, Thomas
May, Andreas
Mekhemar, Mohamed
Conrad, Jonas
Knitschke, Michael
Böttger, Sebastian
Howaldt, Hans-Peter
Riad, Abanoub
Pain perception following computer-controlled versus conventional dental anesthesia: randomized controlled trial
title Pain perception following computer-controlled versus conventional dental anesthesia: randomized controlled trial
title_full Pain perception following computer-controlled versus conventional dental anesthesia: randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Pain perception following computer-controlled versus conventional dental anesthesia: randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Pain perception following computer-controlled versus conventional dental anesthesia: randomized controlled trial
title_short Pain perception following computer-controlled versus conventional dental anesthesia: randomized controlled trial
title_sort pain perception following computer-controlled versus conventional dental anesthesia: randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02454-1
work_keys_str_mv AT attiasameh painperceptionfollowingcomputercontrolledversusconventionaldentalanesthesiarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT austermannthomas painperceptionfollowingcomputercontrolledversusconventionaldentalanesthesiarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mayandreas painperceptionfollowingcomputercontrolledversusconventionaldentalanesthesiarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mekhemarmohamed painperceptionfollowingcomputercontrolledversusconventionaldentalanesthesiarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT conradjonas painperceptionfollowingcomputercontrolledversusconventionaldentalanesthesiarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT knitschkemichael painperceptionfollowingcomputercontrolledversusconventionaldentalanesthesiarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bottgersebastian painperceptionfollowingcomputercontrolledversusconventionaldentalanesthesiarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT howaldthanspeter painperceptionfollowingcomputercontrolledversusconventionaldentalanesthesiarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT riadabanoub painperceptionfollowingcomputercontrolledversusconventionaldentalanesthesiarandomizedcontrolledtrial