Cargando…
Measuring TiO(2)N and AgHEC Airborne Particle Density during a Spray Coating Process
Effective particle density is a key parameter for assessing inhalation exposure of engineered NPs in occupational environments. In this paper, particle density measurements were carried out using two different techniques: one based on the ratio between mass and volumetric particle concentrations; th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36136463 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10090498 |
_version_ | 1784795863899439104 |
---|---|
author | Trabucco, Sara Koivisto, Antti Joonas Ravegnani, Fabrizio Ortelli, Simona Zanoni, Ilaria Blosi, Magda Costa, Anna Luisa Belosi, Franco |
author_facet | Trabucco, Sara Koivisto, Antti Joonas Ravegnani, Fabrizio Ortelli, Simona Zanoni, Ilaria Blosi, Magda Costa, Anna Luisa Belosi, Franco |
author_sort | Trabucco, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Effective particle density is a key parameter for assessing inhalation exposure of engineered NPs in occupational environments. In this paper, particle density measurements were carried out using two different techniques: one based on the ratio between mass and volumetric particle concentrations; the other one based on the ratio between aerodynamic and geometric particle diameter. These different approaches were applied to both field- and laboratory-scale atomization processes where the two target NPs (N-doped TiO(2), TiO(2)N and AgNPs capped with a quaternized hydroxyethylcellulose, AgHEC) were generated. Spray tests using TiO(2)N were observed to release more and bigger particles than tests with AgHEC, as indicated by the measured particle mass concentrations and volumes. Our findings give an effective density of TiO(2)N particle to be in a similar range between field and laboratory measurements (1.8 ± 0.5 g/cm(3)); while AgHEC particle density showed wide variations (3.0 ± 0.5 g/cm(3) and 1.2 + 0.1 g/cm(3) for field and laboratory campaigns, respectively). This finding leads to speculation regarding the composition of particles emitted because atomized particle fragments may contain different Ag-to-HEC ratios, leading to different density values. A further uncertainty factor is probably related to low process emissions, making the subtraction of background concentrations from AgHEC process emissions unreliable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9503037 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95030372022-09-24 Measuring TiO(2)N and AgHEC Airborne Particle Density during a Spray Coating Process Trabucco, Sara Koivisto, Antti Joonas Ravegnani, Fabrizio Ortelli, Simona Zanoni, Ilaria Blosi, Magda Costa, Anna Luisa Belosi, Franco Toxics Article Effective particle density is a key parameter for assessing inhalation exposure of engineered NPs in occupational environments. In this paper, particle density measurements were carried out using two different techniques: one based on the ratio between mass and volumetric particle concentrations; the other one based on the ratio between aerodynamic and geometric particle diameter. These different approaches were applied to both field- and laboratory-scale atomization processes where the two target NPs (N-doped TiO(2), TiO(2)N and AgNPs capped with a quaternized hydroxyethylcellulose, AgHEC) were generated. Spray tests using TiO(2)N were observed to release more and bigger particles than tests with AgHEC, as indicated by the measured particle mass concentrations and volumes. Our findings give an effective density of TiO(2)N particle to be in a similar range between field and laboratory measurements (1.8 ± 0.5 g/cm(3)); while AgHEC particle density showed wide variations (3.0 ± 0.5 g/cm(3) and 1.2 + 0.1 g/cm(3) for field and laboratory campaigns, respectively). This finding leads to speculation regarding the composition of particles emitted because atomized particle fragments may contain different Ag-to-HEC ratios, leading to different density values. A further uncertainty factor is probably related to low process emissions, making the subtraction of background concentrations from AgHEC process emissions unreliable. MDPI 2022-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9503037/ /pubmed/36136463 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10090498 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Trabucco, Sara Koivisto, Antti Joonas Ravegnani, Fabrizio Ortelli, Simona Zanoni, Ilaria Blosi, Magda Costa, Anna Luisa Belosi, Franco Measuring TiO(2)N and AgHEC Airborne Particle Density during a Spray Coating Process |
title | Measuring TiO(2)N and AgHEC Airborne Particle Density during a Spray Coating Process |
title_full | Measuring TiO(2)N and AgHEC Airborne Particle Density during a Spray Coating Process |
title_fullStr | Measuring TiO(2)N and AgHEC Airborne Particle Density during a Spray Coating Process |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring TiO(2)N and AgHEC Airborne Particle Density during a Spray Coating Process |
title_short | Measuring TiO(2)N and AgHEC Airborne Particle Density during a Spray Coating Process |
title_sort | measuring tio(2)n and aghec airborne particle density during a spray coating process |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36136463 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10090498 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trabuccosara measuringtio2nandaghecairborneparticledensityduringaspraycoatingprocess AT koivistoanttijoonas measuringtio2nandaghecairborneparticledensityduringaspraycoatingprocess AT ravegnanifabrizio measuringtio2nandaghecairborneparticledensityduringaspraycoatingprocess AT ortellisimona measuringtio2nandaghecairborneparticledensityduringaspraycoatingprocess AT zanoniilaria measuringtio2nandaghecairborneparticledensityduringaspraycoatingprocess AT blosimagda measuringtio2nandaghecairborneparticledensityduringaspraycoatingprocess AT costaannaluisa measuringtio2nandaghecairborneparticledensityduringaspraycoatingprocess AT belosifranco measuringtio2nandaghecairborneparticledensityduringaspraycoatingprocess |