Cargando…

Measuring TiO(2)N and AgHEC Airborne Particle Density during a Spray Coating Process

Effective particle density is a key parameter for assessing inhalation exposure of engineered NPs in occupational environments. In this paper, particle density measurements were carried out using two different techniques: one based on the ratio between mass and volumetric particle concentrations; th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trabucco, Sara, Koivisto, Antti Joonas, Ravegnani, Fabrizio, Ortelli, Simona, Zanoni, Ilaria, Blosi, Magda, Costa, Anna Luisa, Belosi, Franco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36136463
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10090498
_version_ 1784795863899439104
author Trabucco, Sara
Koivisto, Antti Joonas
Ravegnani, Fabrizio
Ortelli, Simona
Zanoni, Ilaria
Blosi, Magda
Costa, Anna Luisa
Belosi, Franco
author_facet Trabucco, Sara
Koivisto, Antti Joonas
Ravegnani, Fabrizio
Ortelli, Simona
Zanoni, Ilaria
Blosi, Magda
Costa, Anna Luisa
Belosi, Franco
author_sort Trabucco, Sara
collection PubMed
description Effective particle density is a key parameter for assessing inhalation exposure of engineered NPs in occupational environments. In this paper, particle density measurements were carried out using two different techniques: one based on the ratio between mass and volumetric particle concentrations; the other one based on the ratio between aerodynamic and geometric particle diameter. These different approaches were applied to both field- and laboratory-scale atomization processes where the two target NPs (N-doped TiO(2), TiO(2)N and AgNPs capped with a quaternized hydroxyethylcellulose, AgHEC) were generated. Spray tests using TiO(2)N were observed to release more and bigger particles than tests with AgHEC, as indicated by the measured particle mass concentrations and volumes. Our findings give an effective density of TiO(2)N particle to be in a similar range between field and laboratory measurements (1.8 ± 0.5 g/cm(3)); while AgHEC particle density showed wide variations (3.0 ± 0.5 g/cm(3) and 1.2 + 0.1 g/cm(3) for field and laboratory campaigns, respectively). This finding leads to speculation regarding the composition of particles emitted because atomized particle fragments may contain different Ag-to-HEC ratios, leading to different density values. A further uncertainty factor is probably related to low process emissions, making the subtraction of background concentrations from AgHEC process emissions unreliable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9503037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95030372022-09-24 Measuring TiO(2)N and AgHEC Airborne Particle Density during a Spray Coating Process Trabucco, Sara Koivisto, Antti Joonas Ravegnani, Fabrizio Ortelli, Simona Zanoni, Ilaria Blosi, Magda Costa, Anna Luisa Belosi, Franco Toxics Article Effective particle density is a key parameter for assessing inhalation exposure of engineered NPs in occupational environments. In this paper, particle density measurements were carried out using two different techniques: one based on the ratio between mass and volumetric particle concentrations; the other one based on the ratio between aerodynamic and geometric particle diameter. These different approaches were applied to both field- and laboratory-scale atomization processes where the two target NPs (N-doped TiO(2), TiO(2)N and AgNPs capped with a quaternized hydroxyethylcellulose, AgHEC) were generated. Spray tests using TiO(2)N were observed to release more and bigger particles than tests with AgHEC, as indicated by the measured particle mass concentrations and volumes. Our findings give an effective density of TiO(2)N particle to be in a similar range between field and laboratory measurements (1.8 ± 0.5 g/cm(3)); while AgHEC particle density showed wide variations (3.0 ± 0.5 g/cm(3) and 1.2 + 0.1 g/cm(3) for field and laboratory campaigns, respectively). This finding leads to speculation regarding the composition of particles emitted because atomized particle fragments may contain different Ag-to-HEC ratios, leading to different density values. A further uncertainty factor is probably related to low process emissions, making the subtraction of background concentrations from AgHEC process emissions unreliable. MDPI 2022-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9503037/ /pubmed/36136463 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10090498 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Trabucco, Sara
Koivisto, Antti Joonas
Ravegnani, Fabrizio
Ortelli, Simona
Zanoni, Ilaria
Blosi, Magda
Costa, Anna Luisa
Belosi, Franco
Measuring TiO(2)N and AgHEC Airborne Particle Density during a Spray Coating Process
title Measuring TiO(2)N and AgHEC Airborne Particle Density during a Spray Coating Process
title_full Measuring TiO(2)N and AgHEC Airborne Particle Density during a Spray Coating Process
title_fullStr Measuring TiO(2)N and AgHEC Airborne Particle Density during a Spray Coating Process
title_full_unstemmed Measuring TiO(2)N and AgHEC Airborne Particle Density during a Spray Coating Process
title_short Measuring TiO(2)N and AgHEC Airborne Particle Density during a Spray Coating Process
title_sort measuring tio(2)n and aghec airborne particle density during a spray coating process
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36136463
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10090498
work_keys_str_mv AT trabuccosara measuringtio2nandaghecairborneparticledensityduringaspraycoatingprocess
AT koivistoanttijoonas measuringtio2nandaghecairborneparticledensityduringaspraycoatingprocess
AT ravegnanifabrizio measuringtio2nandaghecairborneparticledensityduringaspraycoatingprocess
AT ortellisimona measuringtio2nandaghecairborneparticledensityduringaspraycoatingprocess
AT zanoniilaria measuringtio2nandaghecairborneparticledensityduringaspraycoatingprocess
AT blosimagda measuringtio2nandaghecairborneparticledensityduringaspraycoatingprocess
AT costaannaluisa measuringtio2nandaghecairborneparticledensityduringaspraycoatingprocess
AT belosifranco measuringtio2nandaghecairborneparticledensityduringaspraycoatingprocess