Cargando…

A Differential Profile of Biomarkers between Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Healthy Controls

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is explained by anatomical and electrophysiological changes in the atria determined by high pressure, dilatation, infiltration and inflammation in the myocardium. There are some biomarkers implicated in these processes, namely, NT-proBNP, high sensitivity troponin (Hs-Tn), u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merino-Merino, Ana, Saez-Maleta, Ruth, Salgado-Aranda, Ricardo, AlKassam-Martinez, Daniel, Pascual-Tejerina, Virginia, Martin-Gonzalez, Javier, Garcia-Fernandez, Javier, Perez-Rivera, Jose-Angel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143191
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091406
_version_ 1784795903267176448
author Merino-Merino, Ana
Saez-Maleta, Ruth
Salgado-Aranda, Ricardo
AlKassam-Martinez, Daniel
Pascual-Tejerina, Virginia
Martin-Gonzalez, Javier
Garcia-Fernandez, Javier
Perez-Rivera, Jose-Angel
author_facet Merino-Merino, Ana
Saez-Maleta, Ruth
Salgado-Aranda, Ricardo
AlKassam-Martinez, Daniel
Pascual-Tejerina, Virginia
Martin-Gonzalez, Javier
Garcia-Fernandez, Javier
Perez-Rivera, Jose-Angel
author_sort Merino-Merino, Ana
collection PubMed
description Atrial fibrillation (AF) is explained by anatomical and electrophysiological changes in the atria determined by high pressure, dilatation, infiltration and inflammation in the myocardium. There are some biomarkers implicated in these processes, namely, NT-proBNP, high sensitivity troponin (Hs-Tn), urate, galectin-3, ST2, C reactive protein and fibrinogen. The aim of this study was to assess differences in these biomarkers between patients with AF and healthy controls. We designed a cross-sectional study consecutively including all patients undergoing electrical cardioversion in our hospital for persistent AF and matched healthy controls. We included 115 patients with persistent non-valvular AF and 33 healthy subjects. The biomarkers NT-proBNP, ST2 and Hs-Tn T were significantly related to the presence of AF (1054 ± 833.30 vs. 58.31 ± 59.40, p < 0.001; 35.43 ± 15.89 vs. 27.43 ± 10.95, p < 0.001 and 10.25 ± 6.11 vs. 8.42 ± 6.85, p < 0.001, respectively). NT-proBNP was the best biomarker differentiating AF patients (area under the curve 0.995). The best NT-proBNP cut-off point to differentiate AF was 102 pg/mL; for Hs-Tn T it was 11.5 ng/L and for ST2 it was 37.7 ng/mL. It is possible that these biomarkers intervene at the onset of AF and have no role in AF maintenance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9503201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95032012022-09-24 A Differential Profile of Biomarkers between Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Healthy Controls Merino-Merino, Ana Saez-Maleta, Ruth Salgado-Aranda, Ricardo AlKassam-Martinez, Daniel Pascual-Tejerina, Virginia Martin-Gonzalez, Javier Garcia-Fernandez, Javier Perez-Rivera, Jose-Angel J Pers Med Article Atrial fibrillation (AF) is explained by anatomical and electrophysiological changes in the atria determined by high pressure, dilatation, infiltration and inflammation in the myocardium. There are some biomarkers implicated in these processes, namely, NT-proBNP, high sensitivity troponin (Hs-Tn), urate, galectin-3, ST2, C reactive protein and fibrinogen. The aim of this study was to assess differences in these biomarkers between patients with AF and healthy controls. We designed a cross-sectional study consecutively including all patients undergoing electrical cardioversion in our hospital for persistent AF and matched healthy controls. We included 115 patients with persistent non-valvular AF and 33 healthy subjects. The biomarkers NT-proBNP, ST2 and Hs-Tn T were significantly related to the presence of AF (1054 ± 833.30 vs. 58.31 ± 59.40, p < 0.001; 35.43 ± 15.89 vs. 27.43 ± 10.95, p < 0.001 and 10.25 ± 6.11 vs. 8.42 ± 6.85, p < 0.001, respectively). NT-proBNP was the best biomarker differentiating AF patients (area under the curve 0.995). The best NT-proBNP cut-off point to differentiate AF was 102 pg/mL; for Hs-Tn T it was 11.5 ng/L and for ST2 it was 37.7 ng/mL. It is possible that these biomarkers intervene at the onset of AF and have no role in AF maintenance. MDPI 2022-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9503201/ /pubmed/36143191 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091406 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Merino-Merino, Ana
Saez-Maleta, Ruth
Salgado-Aranda, Ricardo
AlKassam-Martinez, Daniel
Pascual-Tejerina, Virginia
Martin-Gonzalez, Javier
Garcia-Fernandez, Javier
Perez-Rivera, Jose-Angel
A Differential Profile of Biomarkers between Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Healthy Controls
title A Differential Profile of Biomarkers between Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Healthy Controls
title_full A Differential Profile of Biomarkers between Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Healthy Controls
title_fullStr A Differential Profile of Biomarkers between Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Healthy Controls
title_full_unstemmed A Differential Profile of Biomarkers between Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Healthy Controls
title_short A Differential Profile of Biomarkers between Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Healthy Controls
title_sort differential profile of biomarkers between patients with atrial fibrillation and healthy controls
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143191
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091406
work_keys_str_mv AT merinomerinoana adifferentialprofileofbiomarkersbetweenpatientswithatrialfibrillationandhealthycontrols
AT saezmaletaruth adifferentialprofileofbiomarkersbetweenpatientswithatrialfibrillationandhealthycontrols
AT salgadoarandaricardo adifferentialprofileofbiomarkersbetweenpatientswithatrialfibrillationandhealthycontrols
AT alkassammartinezdaniel adifferentialprofileofbiomarkersbetweenpatientswithatrialfibrillationandhealthycontrols
AT pascualtejerinavirginia adifferentialprofileofbiomarkersbetweenpatientswithatrialfibrillationandhealthycontrols
AT martingonzalezjavier adifferentialprofileofbiomarkersbetweenpatientswithatrialfibrillationandhealthycontrols
AT garciafernandezjavier adifferentialprofileofbiomarkersbetweenpatientswithatrialfibrillationandhealthycontrols
AT perezriverajoseangel adifferentialprofileofbiomarkersbetweenpatientswithatrialfibrillationandhealthycontrols
AT merinomerinoana differentialprofileofbiomarkersbetweenpatientswithatrialfibrillationandhealthycontrols
AT saezmaletaruth differentialprofileofbiomarkersbetweenpatientswithatrialfibrillationandhealthycontrols
AT salgadoarandaricardo differentialprofileofbiomarkersbetweenpatientswithatrialfibrillationandhealthycontrols
AT alkassammartinezdaniel differentialprofileofbiomarkersbetweenpatientswithatrialfibrillationandhealthycontrols
AT pascualtejerinavirginia differentialprofileofbiomarkersbetweenpatientswithatrialfibrillationandhealthycontrols
AT martingonzalezjavier differentialprofileofbiomarkersbetweenpatientswithatrialfibrillationandhealthycontrols
AT garciafernandezjavier differentialprofileofbiomarkersbetweenpatientswithatrialfibrillationandhealthycontrols
AT perezriverajoseangel differentialprofileofbiomarkersbetweenpatientswithatrialfibrillationandhealthycontrols