Cargando…
Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Impact and Effectiveness in Six High-Risk Populations: A Systematic Literature Review
Specific adult populations known to be at high risk for human papillomavirus (HPV)-related disease, such as men who have sex with men, are inconsistently included in national immunization programs. No compilation of the evidence on the real-world impact and effectiveness of HPV vaccines across these...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36146620 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10091543 |
_version_ | 1784795904785514496 |
---|---|
author | Goodman, Elizabeth Reuschenbach, Miriam Kaminski, Allysen Ronnebaum, Sarah |
author_facet | Goodman, Elizabeth Reuschenbach, Miriam Kaminski, Allysen Ronnebaum, Sarah |
author_sort | Goodman, Elizabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | Specific adult populations known to be at high risk for human papillomavirus (HPV)-related disease, such as men who have sex with men, are inconsistently included in national immunization programs. No compilation of the evidence on the real-world impact and effectiveness of HPV vaccines across these populations exists. This systematic literature review identifies and synthesizes the evidence of the real-world impact and effectiveness of the quadrivalent and nonavalent HPV vaccines in high-risk populations: women with prior/current HPV-related anogenital disease, men who have sex with men, immunocompromised/immunosuppressed individuals, female sex workers, transgender and non-binary individuals, and patients with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP). The outcomes included anogenital precancers/cancers, head and neck cancers, genital warts, and RRP recurrence. From the 2216 records identified, 30 studies (25 effectiveness and 5 impact studies) were included in this systematic literature review. The results, quantity, and quality of these studies were highly variable. The evidence for effectiveness was of high quality only in women with prior/current cervical disease and in individuals with RRP, the most frequently studied populations. No studies of transgender/non-binary individuals or female sex workers were identified. The real-world evidence supports HPV vaccination among women with prior cervical disease and individuals with RRP. Significant real-world data gaps remain in these high-risk populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9503207 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95032072022-09-24 Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Impact and Effectiveness in Six High-Risk Populations: A Systematic Literature Review Goodman, Elizabeth Reuschenbach, Miriam Kaminski, Allysen Ronnebaum, Sarah Vaccines (Basel) Review Specific adult populations known to be at high risk for human papillomavirus (HPV)-related disease, such as men who have sex with men, are inconsistently included in national immunization programs. No compilation of the evidence on the real-world impact and effectiveness of HPV vaccines across these populations exists. This systematic literature review identifies and synthesizes the evidence of the real-world impact and effectiveness of the quadrivalent and nonavalent HPV vaccines in high-risk populations: women with prior/current HPV-related anogenital disease, men who have sex with men, immunocompromised/immunosuppressed individuals, female sex workers, transgender and non-binary individuals, and patients with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP). The outcomes included anogenital precancers/cancers, head and neck cancers, genital warts, and RRP recurrence. From the 2216 records identified, 30 studies (25 effectiveness and 5 impact studies) were included in this systematic literature review. The results, quantity, and quality of these studies were highly variable. The evidence for effectiveness was of high quality only in women with prior/current cervical disease and in individuals with RRP, the most frequently studied populations. No studies of transgender/non-binary individuals or female sex workers were identified. The real-world evidence supports HPV vaccination among women with prior cervical disease and individuals with RRP. Significant real-world data gaps remain in these high-risk populations. MDPI 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9503207/ /pubmed/36146620 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10091543 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Goodman, Elizabeth Reuschenbach, Miriam Kaminski, Allysen Ronnebaum, Sarah Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Impact and Effectiveness in Six High-Risk Populations: A Systematic Literature Review |
title | Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Impact and Effectiveness in Six High-Risk Populations: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_full | Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Impact and Effectiveness in Six High-Risk Populations: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_fullStr | Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Impact and Effectiveness in Six High-Risk Populations: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Impact and Effectiveness in Six High-Risk Populations: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_short | Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Impact and Effectiveness in Six High-Risk Populations: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_sort | human papillomavirus vaccine impact and effectiveness in six high-risk populations: a systematic literature review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36146620 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10091543 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goodmanelizabeth humanpapillomavirusvaccineimpactandeffectivenessinsixhighriskpopulationsasystematicliteraturereview AT reuschenbachmiriam humanpapillomavirusvaccineimpactandeffectivenessinsixhighriskpopulationsasystematicliteraturereview AT kaminskiallysen humanpapillomavirusvaccineimpactandeffectivenessinsixhighriskpopulationsasystematicliteraturereview AT ronnebaumsarah humanpapillomavirusvaccineimpactandeffectivenessinsixhighriskpopulationsasystematicliteraturereview |