Cargando…

Development of the quality of teen trauma acute care patient and parent-reported experience measure

OBJECTIVE: Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) provide valuable patient feedback on quality of care and have been associated with clinical outcomes. We aimed to test the reliability of a modified adult trauma care PREM instrument delivered to adolescents admitted to hospital for traumatic i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yeung, Matthew, Hagel, Brent E., Bobrovitz, Niklas, Stelfox, Thomas H., Yanchar, Natalie L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06194-x
_version_ 1784795909661392896
author Yeung, Matthew
Hagel, Brent E.
Bobrovitz, Niklas
Stelfox, Thomas H.
Yanchar, Natalie L.
author_facet Yeung, Matthew
Hagel, Brent E.
Bobrovitz, Niklas
Stelfox, Thomas H.
Yanchar, Natalie L.
author_sort Yeung, Matthew
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) provide valuable patient feedback on quality of care and have been associated with clinical outcomes. We aimed to test the reliability of a modified adult trauma care PREM instrument delivered to adolescents admitted to hospital for traumatic injuries, and their parents. Modifications included addition of questions reflecting teen-focused constructs on education supports, social network maintenance and family accommodation. RESULTS: Forty adolescent patients and 40 parents participated. Test-retest reliability was assessed using Cohen’s kappa, weighted kappa, and percent agreement between responses. Directionality of changed responses was noted. Most of the study ran during the COVID-19 pandemic. We established good reliability of questions related to in-hospital and post-discharge communication, clinical and ancillary care and family accommodation. We identified poorer reliability among constructs reflecting experiences that varied from the norm during the pandemic, which included “maintenance of social networks”, “education supports”, “scheduling clinical follow-ups” and “post-discharge supports”. Parents, but not patients, demonstrated more directionality of change of responses by responding with more negative in-hospital and more positive post-discharge experiences over time between the test and retest periods, suggesting risk of recall bias. Situational factors due to the COVID-19 pandemic and potential risks of recall bias may have limited the reliability of some parts of the survey. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13104-022-06194-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9503226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95032262022-09-24 Development of the quality of teen trauma acute care patient and parent-reported experience measure Yeung, Matthew Hagel, Brent E. Bobrovitz, Niklas Stelfox, Thomas H. Yanchar, Natalie L. BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) provide valuable patient feedback on quality of care and have been associated with clinical outcomes. We aimed to test the reliability of a modified adult trauma care PREM instrument delivered to adolescents admitted to hospital for traumatic injuries, and their parents. Modifications included addition of questions reflecting teen-focused constructs on education supports, social network maintenance and family accommodation. RESULTS: Forty adolescent patients and 40 parents participated. Test-retest reliability was assessed using Cohen’s kappa, weighted kappa, and percent agreement between responses. Directionality of changed responses was noted. Most of the study ran during the COVID-19 pandemic. We established good reliability of questions related to in-hospital and post-discharge communication, clinical and ancillary care and family accommodation. We identified poorer reliability among constructs reflecting experiences that varied from the norm during the pandemic, which included “maintenance of social networks”, “education supports”, “scheduling clinical follow-ups” and “post-discharge supports”. Parents, but not patients, demonstrated more directionality of change of responses by responding with more negative in-hospital and more positive post-discharge experiences over time between the test and retest periods, suggesting risk of recall bias. Situational factors due to the COVID-19 pandemic and potential risks of recall bias may have limited the reliability of some parts of the survey. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13104-022-06194-x. BioMed Central 2022-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9503226/ /pubmed/36138467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06194-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Note
Yeung, Matthew
Hagel, Brent E.
Bobrovitz, Niklas
Stelfox, Thomas H.
Yanchar, Natalie L.
Development of the quality of teen trauma acute care patient and parent-reported experience measure
title Development of the quality of teen trauma acute care patient and parent-reported experience measure
title_full Development of the quality of teen trauma acute care patient and parent-reported experience measure
title_fullStr Development of the quality of teen trauma acute care patient and parent-reported experience measure
title_full_unstemmed Development of the quality of teen trauma acute care patient and parent-reported experience measure
title_short Development of the quality of teen trauma acute care patient and parent-reported experience measure
title_sort development of the quality of teen trauma acute care patient and parent-reported experience measure
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06194-x
work_keys_str_mv AT yeungmatthew developmentofthequalityofteentraumaacutecarepatientandparentreportedexperiencemeasure
AT hagelbrente developmentofthequalityofteentraumaacutecarepatientandparentreportedexperiencemeasure
AT bobrovitzniklas developmentofthequalityofteentraumaacutecarepatientandparentreportedexperiencemeasure
AT stelfoxthomash developmentofthequalityofteentraumaacutecarepatientandparentreportedexperiencemeasure
AT yancharnataliel developmentofthequalityofteentraumaacutecarepatientandparentreportedexperiencemeasure