Cargando…

Effects of Different Titanium Surface Treatments on Adhesion, Proliferation and Differentiation of Bone Cells: An In Vitro Study

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impacts of different sandblasting procedures in acid etching of Ti6Al4V surfaces on osteoblast cell behavior, regarding various physicochemical and topographical parameters. Furthermore, differences in osteoblast cell behavior between cpTi and Ti6Al4V...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stoilov, Milan, Stoilov, Lea, Enkling, Norbert, Stark, Helmut, Winter, Jochen, Marder, Michael, Kraus, Dominik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36135578
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb13030143
_version_ 1784795951702999040
author Stoilov, Milan
Stoilov, Lea
Enkling, Norbert
Stark, Helmut
Winter, Jochen
Marder, Michael
Kraus, Dominik
author_facet Stoilov, Milan
Stoilov, Lea
Enkling, Norbert
Stark, Helmut
Winter, Jochen
Marder, Michael
Kraus, Dominik
author_sort Stoilov, Milan
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the impacts of different sandblasting procedures in acid etching of Ti6Al4V surfaces on osteoblast cell behavior, regarding various physicochemical and topographical parameters. Furthermore, differences in osteoblast cell behavior between cpTi and Ti6Al4V SA surfaces were evaluated. Sandblasting and subsequent acid etching of cpTi and Ti6Al4V discs was performed with Al(2)O(3) grains of different sizes and with varying blasting pressures. The micro- and nano-roughness of the experimental SA surfaces were analyzed via confocal, atomic force and scanning electron microscopy. Surface free energy and friction coefficients were determined. hFOB 1.19 cells were seeded to evaluate adhesion, proliferation and osteoblastic differentiation for up to 12 d via crystal violet assays, MTT assays, ALP activity assays and Alizarin Red staining assays. Differences in blasting procedures had significant impacts on surface macro- and micro-topography. The crystal violet assay revealed a significant inverse relationship between blasting grain size and hFOB cell growth after 7 days. This trend was also visible in the Alizarin Red assays staining after 12 d: there was significantly higher biomineralization visible in the group that was sandblasted with smaller grains (F180) when compared to standard-grain-size groups (F70). SA samples treated with reduced blasting pressure exhibited lower hFOB adhesion and growth capabilities at initial (2 h) and later time points for up to 7 days, when compared to the standard SA surface, even though micro-roughness and other relevant surface parameters were similar. Overall, etched-only surfaces consistently exhibited equivalent or higher adhesion, proliferation and differentiation capabilities when compared to all other sandblasted and etched surfaces. No differences were found between cpTi and Ti6Al4V SA surfaces. Subtle modifications in the blasting protocol for Ti6Al4V SA surfaces significantly affect the proliferative and differentiation behavior of human osteoblasts. Surface roughness parameters are not sufficient to predict osteoblast behavior on etched Ti6Al4V surfaces.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9503392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95033922022-09-24 Effects of Different Titanium Surface Treatments on Adhesion, Proliferation and Differentiation of Bone Cells: An In Vitro Study Stoilov, Milan Stoilov, Lea Enkling, Norbert Stark, Helmut Winter, Jochen Marder, Michael Kraus, Dominik J Funct Biomater Article The objective of this study was to evaluate the impacts of different sandblasting procedures in acid etching of Ti6Al4V surfaces on osteoblast cell behavior, regarding various physicochemical and topographical parameters. Furthermore, differences in osteoblast cell behavior between cpTi and Ti6Al4V SA surfaces were evaluated. Sandblasting and subsequent acid etching of cpTi and Ti6Al4V discs was performed with Al(2)O(3) grains of different sizes and with varying blasting pressures. The micro- and nano-roughness of the experimental SA surfaces were analyzed via confocal, atomic force and scanning electron microscopy. Surface free energy and friction coefficients were determined. hFOB 1.19 cells were seeded to evaluate adhesion, proliferation and osteoblastic differentiation for up to 12 d via crystal violet assays, MTT assays, ALP activity assays and Alizarin Red staining assays. Differences in blasting procedures had significant impacts on surface macro- and micro-topography. The crystal violet assay revealed a significant inverse relationship between blasting grain size and hFOB cell growth after 7 days. This trend was also visible in the Alizarin Red assays staining after 12 d: there was significantly higher biomineralization visible in the group that was sandblasted with smaller grains (F180) when compared to standard-grain-size groups (F70). SA samples treated with reduced blasting pressure exhibited lower hFOB adhesion and growth capabilities at initial (2 h) and later time points for up to 7 days, when compared to the standard SA surface, even though micro-roughness and other relevant surface parameters were similar. Overall, etched-only surfaces consistently exhibited equivalent or higher adhesion, proliferation and differentiation capabilities when compared to all other sandblasted and etched surfaces. No differences were found between cpTi and Ti6Al4V SA surfaces. Subtle modifications in the blasting protocol for Ti6Al4V SA surfaces significantly affect the proliferative and differentiation behavior of human osteoblasts. Surface roughness parameters are not sufficient to predict osteoblast behavior on etched Ti6Al4V surfaces. MDPI 2022-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9503392/ /pubmed/36135578 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb13030143 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Stoilov, Milan
Stoilov, Lea
Enkling, Norbert
Stark, Helmut
Winter, Jochen
Marder, Michael
Kraus, Dominik
Effects of Different Titanium Surface Treatments on Adhesion, Proliferation and Differentiation of Bone Cells: An In Vitro Study
title Effects of Different Titanium Surface Treatments on Adhesion, Proliferation and Differentiation of Bone Cells: An In Vitro Study
title_full Effects of Different Titanium Surface Treatments on Adhesion, Proliferation and Differentiation of Bone Cells: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Effects of Different Titanium Surface Treatments on Adhesion, Proliferation and Differentiation of Bone Cells: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Different Titanium Surface Treatments on Adhesion, Proliferation and Differentiation of Bone Cells: An In Vitro Study
title_short Effects of Different Titanium Surface Treatments on Adhesion, Proliferation and Differentiation of Bone Cells: An In Vitro Study
title_sort effects of different titanium surface treatments on adhesion, proliferation and differentiation of bone cells: an in vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36135578
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb13030143
work_keys_str_mv AT stoilovmilan effectsofdifferenttitaniumsurfacetreatmentsonadhesionproliferationanddifferentiationofbonecellsaninvitrostudy
AT stoilovlea effectsofdifferenttitaniumsurfacetreatmentsonadhesionproliferationanddifferentiationofbonecellsaninvitrostudy
AT enklingnorbert effectsofdifferenttitaniumsurfacetreatmentsonadhesionproliferationanddifferentiationofbonecellsaninvitrostudy
AT starkhelmut effectsofdifferenttitaniumsurfacetreatmentsonadhesionproliferationanddifferentiationofbonecellsaninvitrostudy
AT winterjochen effectsofdifferenttitaniumsurfacetreatmentsonadhesionproliferationanddifferentiationofbonecellsaninvitrostudy
AT mardermichael effectsofdifferenttitaniumsurfacetreatmentsonadhesionproliferationanddifferentiationofbonecellsaninvitrostudy
AT krausdominik effectsofdifferenttitaniumsurfacetreatmentsonadhesionproliferationanddifferentiationofbonecellsaninvitrostudy