Cargando…
Airway Management during Massive Gastric Regurgitation Using VieScope or Macintosh Laryngoscope—A Randomized, Controlled Simulation Trial
In this model of massive gastric aspiration, we compared two different laryngoscopes (VieScope and Macintosh) in a randomized, controlled simulation study. The primary endpoint was time to intubation; the secondary endpoints were intubation success (i.e., tracheal tube position) and amount of pulmon...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185363 |
_version_ | 1784795953439440896 |
---|---|
author | Ecker, Hannes Stranz, Sebastian Kolvenbach, Simone Herff, Holger Hellmich, Martin Wetsch, Wolfgang A. |
author_facet | Ecker, Hannes Stranz, Sebastian Kolvenbach, Simone Herff, Holger Hellmich, Martin Wetsch, Wolfgang A. |
author_sort | Ecker, Hannes |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this model of massive gastric aspiration, we compared two different laryngoscopes (VieScope and Macintosh) in a randomized, controlled simulation study. The primary endpoint was time to intubation; the secondary endpoints were intubation success (i.e., tracheal tube position) and amount of pulmonary aspiration. Thirty-four anesthetists performed endotracheal intubation using VieScope and Macintosh laryngoscopy in a randomized order on an airway manikin simulating massive regurgitation of gastric fluid. The primary endpoint “time until intubation” could be achieved significantly faster (mean −12.4 s [95% confidence intervals (CI) −19.7 s; −7.3 s]) with Macintosh compared to VieScope (p < 0.001). Concerning “correct tube position”, no statistical difference was found between the devices (p = 1.0). The mean time to first ventilation was −11.1 s [95% CI −18.3 s; −5.3 s] when using Macintosh (p = 0.001). The mean volume of aspirated gastric fluid was lower in the Macintosh group: −90.0 mL [95% CI −235.0 mL; −27.5 mL] (p = 0.011). Data from this simulation study suggest that in a model of massive gastric regurgitation, airway management can be achieved faster and with less gastric aspiration when using a Macintosh laryngoscope compared to a VieScope laryngoscope. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9503399 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95033992022-09-24 Airway Management during Massive Gastric Regurgitation Using VieScope or Macintosh Laryngoscope—A Randomized, Controlled Simulation Trial Ecker, Hannes Stranz, Sebastian Kolvenbach, Simone Herff, Holger Hellmich, Martin Wetsch, Wolfgang A. J Clin Med Article In this model of massive gastric aspiration, we compared two different laryngoscopes (VieScope and Macintosh) in a randomized, controlled simulation study. The primary endpoint was time to intubation; the secondary endpoints were intubation success (i.e., tracheal tube position) and amount of pulmonary aspiration. Thirty-four anesthetists performed endotracheal intubation using VieScope and Macintosh laryngoscopy in a randomized order on an airway manikin simulating massive regurgitation of gastric fluid. The primary endpoint “time until intubation” could be achieved significantly faster (mean −12.4 s [95% confidence intervals (CI) −19.7 s; −7.3 s]) with Macintosh compared to VieScope (p < 0.001). Concerning “correct tube position”, no statistical difference was found between the devices (p = 1.0). The mean time to first ventilation was −11.1 s [95% CI −18.3 s; −5.3 s] when using Macintosh (p = 0.001). The mean volume of aspirated gastric fluid was lower in the Macintosh group: −90.0 mL [95% CI −235.0 mL; −27.5 mL] (p = 0.011). Data from this simulation study suggest that in a model of massive gastric regurgitation, airway management can be achieved faster and with less gastric aspiration when using a Macintosh laryngoscope compared to a VieScope laryngoscope. MDPI 2022-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9503399/ /pubmed/36143008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185363 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ecker, Hannes Stranz, Sebastian Kolvenbach, Simone Herff, Holger Hellmich, Martin Wetsch, Wolfgang A. Airway Management during Massive Gastric Regurgitation Using VieScope or Macintosh Laryngoscope—A Randomized, Controlled Simulation Trial |
title | Airway Management during Massive Gastric Regurgitation Using VieScope or Macintosh Laryngoscope—A Randomized, Controlled Simulation Trial |
title_full | Airway Management during Massive Gastric Regurgitation Using VieScope or Macintosh Laryngoscope—A Randomized, Controlled Simulation Trial |
title_fullStr | Airway Management during Massive Gastric Regurgitation Using VieScope or Macintosh Laryngoscope—A Randomized, Controlled Simulation Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Airway Management during Massive Gastric Regurgitation Using VieScope or Macintosh Laryngoscope—A Randomized, Controlled Simulation Trial |
title_short | Airway Management during Massive Gastric Regurgitation Using VieScope or Macintosh Laryngoscope—A Randomized, Controlled Simulation Trial |
title_sort | airway management during massive gastric regurgitation using viescope or macintosh laryngoscope—a randomized, controlled simulation trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185363 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eckerhannes airwaymanagementduringmassivegastricregurgitationusingviescopeormacintoshlaryngoscopearandomizedcontrolledsimulationtrial AT stranzsebastian airwaymanagementduringmassivegastricregurgitationusingviescopeormacintoshlaryngoscopearandomizedcontrolledsimulationtrial AT kolvenbachsimone airwaymanagementduringmassivegastricregurgitationusingviescopeormacintoshlaryngoscopearandomizedcontrolledsimulationtrial AT herffholger airwaymanagementduringmassivegastricregurgitationusingviescopeormacintoshlaryngoscopearandomizedcontrolledsimulationtrial AT hellmichmartin airwaymanagementduringmassivegastricregurgitationusingviescopeormacintoshlaryngoscopearandomizedcontrolledsimulationtrial AT wetschwolfganga airwaymanagementduringmassivegastricregurgitationusingviescopeormacintoshlaryngoscopearandomizedcontrolledsimulationtrial |