Cargando…

Apprehending the NAD(+)–ADPr-Dependent Systems in the Virus World

NAD(+) and ADP-ribose (ADPr)-containing molecules are at the interface of virus–host conflicts across life encompassing RNA processing, restriction, lysogeny/dormancy and functional hijacking. We objectively defined the central components of the NAD(+)–ADPr networks involved in these conflicts and s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iyer, Lakshminarayan M., Burroughs, A. Maxwell, Anantharaman, Vivek, Aravind, L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36146784
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14091977
_version_ 1784796018538184704
author Iyer, Lakshminarayan M.
Burroughs, A. Maxwell
Anantharaman, Vivek
Aravind, L.
author_facet Iyer, Lakshminarayan M.
Burroughs, A. Maxwell
Anantharaman, Vivek
Aravind, L.
author_sort Iyer, Lakshminarayan M.
collection PubMed
description NAD(+) and ADP-ribose (ADPr)-containing molecules are at the interface of virus–host conflicts across life encompassing RNA processing, restriction, lysogeny/dormancy and functional hijacking. We objectively defined the central components of the NAD(+)–ADPr networks involved in these conflicts and systematically surveyed 21,191 completely sequenced viral proteomes representative of all publicly available branches of the viral world to reconstruct a comprehensive picture of the viral NAD(+)–ADPr systems. These systems have been widely and repeatedly exploited by positive-strand RNA and DNA viruses, especially those with larger genomes and more intricate life-history strategies. We present evidence that ADP-ribosyltransferases (ARTs), ADPr-targeting Macro, NADAR and Nudix proteins are frequently packaged into virions, particularly in phages with contractile tails (Myoviruses), and deployed during infection to modify host macromolecules and counter NAD(+)-derived signals involved in viral restriction. Genes encoding NAD(+)–ADPr-utilizing domains were repeatedly exchanged between distantly related viruses, hosts and endo-parasites/symbionts, suggesting selection for them across the virus world. Contextual analysis indicates that the bacteriophage versions of ADPr-targeting domains are more likely to counter soluble ADPr derivatives, while the eukaryotic RNA viral versions might prefer macromolecular ADPr adducts. Finally, we also use comparative genomics to predict host systems involved in countering viral ADP ribosylation of host molecules.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9503650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95036502022-09-24 Apprehending the NAD(+)–ADPr-Dependent Systems in the Virus World Iyer, Lakshminarayan M. Burroughs, A. Maxwell Anantharaman, Vivek Aravind, L. Viruses Article NAD(+) and ADP-ribose (ADPr)-containing molecules are at the interface of virus–host conflicts across life encompassing RNA processing, restriction, lysogeny/dormancy and functional hijacking. We objectively defined the central components of the NAD(+)–ADPr networks involved in these conflicts and systematically surveyed 21,191 completely sequenced viral proteomes representative of all publicly available branches of the viral world to reconstruct a comprehensive picture of the viral NAD(+)–ADPr systems. These systems have been widely and repeatedly exploited by positive-strand RNA and DNA viruses, especially those with larger genomes and more intricate life-history strategies. We present evidence that ADP-ribosyltransferases (ARTs), ADPr-targeting Macro, NADAR and Nudix proteins are frequently packaged into virions, particularly in phages with contractile tails (Myoviruses), and deployed during infection to modify host macromolecules and counter NAD(+)-derived signals involved in viral restriction. Genes encoding NAD(+)–ADPr-utilizing domains were repeatedly exchanged between distantly related viruses, hosts and endo-parasites/symbionts, suggesting selection for them across the virus world. Contextual analysis indicates that the bacteriophage versions of ADPr-targeting domains are more likely to counter soluble ADPr derivatives, while the eukaryotic RNA viral versions might prefer macromolecular ADPr adducts. Finally, we also use comparative genomics to predict host systems involved in countering viral ADP ribosylation of host molecules. MDPI 2022-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9503650/ /pubmed/36146784 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14091977 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Iyer, Lakshminarayan M.
Burroughs, A. Maxwell
Anantharaman, Vivek
Aravind, L.
Apprehending the NAD(+)–ADPr-Dependent Systems in the Virus World
title Apprehending the NAD(+)–ADPr-Dependent Systems in the Virus World
title_full Apprehending the NAD(+)–ADPr-Dependent Systems in the Virus World
title_fullStr Apprehending the NAD(+)–ADPr-Dependent Systems in the Virus World
title_full_unstemmed Apprehending the NAD(+)–ADPr-Dependent Systems in the Virus World
title_short Apprehending the NAD(+)–ADPr-Dependent Systems in the Virus World
title_sort apprehending the nad(+)–adpr-dependent systems in the virus world
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36146784
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14091977
work_keys_str_mv AT iyerlakshminarayanm apprehendingthenadadprdependentsystemsinthevirusworld
AT burroughsamaxwell apprehendingthenadadprdependentsystemsinthevirusworld
AT anantharamanvivek apprehendingthenadadprdependentsystemsinthevirusworld
AT aravindl apprehendingthenadadprdependentsystemsinthevirusworld