Cargando…

Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management—Part 1: Templating: Past, Present and Future

Hip arthroplasty is a frequently used procedure with high success rates. Its main indications are primary or secondary advanced osteoarthritis, due to acute fracture, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and hip dysplasia. The goals of HA are to reduce pain and restore normal hip biomechanics, allowin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Germain, Edouard, Lombard, Charles, Boubaker, Fatma, Louis, Mathias, Blum, Alain, Gondim-Teixeira, Pedro Augusto, Gillet, Romain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143112
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185465
_version_ 1784796019036258304
author Germain, Edouard
Lombard, Charles
Boubaker, Fatma
Louis, Mathias
Blum, Alain
Gondim-Teixeira, Pedro Augusto
Gillet, Romain
author_facet Germain, Edouard
Lombard, Charles
Boubaker, Fatma
Louis, Mathias
Blum, Alain
Gondim-Teixeira, Pedro Augusto
Gillet, Romain
author_sort Germain, Edouard
collection PubMed
description Hip arthroplasty is a frequently used procedure with high success rates. Its main indications are primary or secondary advanced osteoarthritis, due to acute fracture, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and hip dysplasia. The goals of HA are to reduce pain and restore normal hip biomechanics, allowing a return to the patient’s normal activities. To reach those goals, the size of implants must suit, and their positioning must meet, quality criteria, which can be determined by preoperative imaging. Moreover, mechanical complications can be influenced by implant size and position, and could be avoided by precise preoperative templating. Templating used to rely on standard radiographs, but recently the use of EOS(®) imaging and CT has been growing, given the 3D approach provided by these methods. However, there is no consensus on the optimal imaging work-up, which may have an impact on the outcomes of the procedure. This article reviews the current principles of templating, the various imaging techniques used for it, as well as their advantages and drawbacks, and their expected results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9503653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95036532022-09-24 Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management—Part 1: Templating: Past, Present and Future Germain, Edouard Lombard, Charles Boubaker, Fatma Louis, Mathias Blum, Alain Gondim-Teixeira, Pedro Augusto Gillet, Romain J Clin Med Review Hip arthroplasty is a frequently used procedure with high success rates. Its main indications are primary or secondary advanced osteoarthritis, due to acute fracture, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and hip dysplasia. The goals of HA are to reduce pain and restore normal hip biomechanics, allowing a return to the patient’s normal activities. To reach those goals, the size of implants must suit, and their positioning must meet, quality criteria, which can be determined by preoperative imaging. Moreover, mechanical complications can be influenced by implant size and position, and could be avoided by precise preoperative templating. Templating used to rely on standard radiographs, but recently the use of EOS(®) imaging and CT has been growing, given the 3D approach provided by these methods. However, there is no consensus on the optimal imaging work-up, which may have an impact on the outcomes of the procedure. This article reviews the current principles of templating, the various imaging techniques used for it, as well as their advantages and drawbacks, and their expected results. MDPI 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9503653/ /pubmed/36143112 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185465 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Germain, Edouard
Lombard, Charles
Boubaker, Fatma
Louis, Mathias
Blum, Alain
Gondim-Teixeira, Pedro Augusto
Gillet, Romain
Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management—Part 1: Templating: Past, Present and Future
title Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management—Part 1: Templating: Past, Present and Future
title_full Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management—Part 1: Templating: Past, Present and Future
title_fullStr Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management—Part 1: Templating: Past, Present and Future
title_full_unstemmed Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management—Part 1: Templating: Past, Present and Future
title_short Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management—Part 1: Templating: Past, Present and Future
title_sort imaging in hip arthroplasty management—part 1: templating: past, present and future
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143112
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185465
work_keys_str_mv AT germainedouard imaginginhiparthroplastymanagementpart1templatingpastpresentandfuture
AT lombardcharles imaginginhiparthroplastymanagementpart1templatingpastpresentandfuture
AT boubakerfatma imaginginhiparthroplastymanagementpart1templatingpastpresentandfuture
AT louismathias imaginginhiparthroplastymanagementpart1templatingpastpresentandfuture
AT blumalain imaginginhiparthroplastymanagementpart1templatingpastpresentandfuture
AT gondimteixeirapedroaugusto imaginginhiparthroplastymanagementpart1templatingpastpresentandfuture
AT gilletromain imaginginhiparthroplastymanagementpart1templatingpastpresentandfuture