Cargando…
Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management—Part 1: Templating: Past, Present and Future
Hip arthroplasty is a frequently used procedure with high success rates. Its main indications are primary or secondary advanced osteoarthritis, due to acute fracture, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and hip dysplasia. The goals of HA are to reduce pain and restore normal hip biomechanics, allowin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143112 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185465 |
_version_ | 1784796019036258304 |
---|---|
author | Germain, Edouard Lombard, Charles Boubaker, Fatma Louis, Mathias Blum, Alain Gondim-Teixeira, Pedro Augusto Gillet, Romain |
author_facet | Germain, Edouard Lombard, Charles Boubaker, Fatma Louis, Mathias Blum, Alain Gondim-Teixeira, Pedro Augusto Gillet, Romain |
author_sort | Germain, Edouard |
collection | PubMed |
description | Hip arthroplasty is a frequently used procedure with high success rates. Its main indications are primary or secondary advanced osteoarthritis, due to acute fracture, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and hip dysplasia. The goals of HA are to reduce pain and restore normal hip biomechanics, allowing a return to the patient’s normal activities. To reach those goals, the size of implants must suit, and their positioning must meet, quality criteria, which can be determined by preoperative imaging. Moreover, mechanical complications can be influenced by implant size and position, and could be avoided by precise preoperative templating. Templating used to rely on standard radiographs, but recently the use of EOS(®) imaging and CT has been growing, given the 3D approach provided by these methods. However, there is no consensus on the optimal imaging work-up, which may have an impact on the outcomes of the procedure. This article reviews the current principles of templating, the various imaging techniques used for it, as well as their advantages and drawbacks, and their expected results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9503653 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95036532022-09-24 Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management—Part 1: Templating: Past, Present and Future Germain, Edouard Lombard, Charles Boubaker, Fatma Louis, Mathias Blum, Alain Gondim-Teixeira, Pedro Augusto Gillet, Romain J Clin Med Review Hip arthroplasty is a frequently used procedure with high success rates. Its main indications are primary or secondary advanced osteoarthritis, due to acute fracture, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and hip dysplasia. The goals of HA are to reduce pain and restore normal hip biomechanics, allowing a return to the patient’s normal activities. To reach those goals, the size of implants must suit, and their positioning must meet, quality criteria, which can be determined by preoperative imaging. Moreover, mechanical complications can be influenced by implant size and position, and could be avoided by precise preoperative templating. Templating used to rely on standard radiographs, but recently the use of EOS(®) imaging and CT has been growing, given the 3D approach provided by these methods. However, there is no consensus on the optimal imaging work-up, which may have an impact on the outcomes of the procedure. This article reviews the current principles of templating, the various imaging techniques used for it, as well as their advantages and drawbacks, and their expected results. MDPI 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9503653/ /pubmed/36143112 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185465 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Germain, Edouard Lombard, Charles Boubaker, Fatma Louis, Mathias Blum, Alain Gondim-Teixeira, Pedro Augusto Gillet, Romain Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management—Part 1: Templating: Past, Present and Future |
title | Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management—Part 1: Templating: Past, Present and Future |
title_full | Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management—Part 1: Templating: Past, Present and Future |
title_fullStr | Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management—Part 1: Templating: Past, Present and Future |
title_full_unstemmed | Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management—Part 1: Templating: Past, Present and Future |
title_short | Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management—Part 1: Templating: Past, Present and Future |
title_sort | imaging in hip arthroplasty management—part 1: templating: past, present and future |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143112 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185465 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT germainedouard imaginginhiparthroplastymanagementpart1templatingpastpresentandfuture AT lombardcharles imaginginhiparthroplastymanagementpart1templatingpastpresentandfuture AT boubakerfatma imaginginhiparthroplastymanagementpart1templatingpastpresentandfuture AT louismathias imaginginhiparthroplastymanagementpart1templatingpastpresentandfuture AT blumalain imaginginhiparthroplastymanagementpart1templatingpastpresentandfuture AT gondimteixeirapedroaugusto imaginginhiparthroplastymanagementpart1templatingpastpresentandfuture AT gilletromain imaginginhiparthroplastymanagementpart1templatingpastpresentandfuture |