Cargando…

Control Efficiency and Yield Response of Chemical and Biological Treatments against Fruit Rot of Arecanut: A Network Meta-Analysis

Fruit rot disease (FRD) in arecanut has appeared in most of the arecanut growing regions of India in the last few decades. A few comprehensive studies on the management of FRD under field conditions have examined various treatment combinations for disease control and yield response analysis. This st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patil, Balanagouda, Sridhara, Shankarappa, Narayanaswamy, Hanumappa, Hegde, Vinayaka, Mishra, Ajay Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36135662
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8090937
_version_ 1784796042525409280
author Patil, Balanagouda
Sridhara, Shankarappa
Narayanaswamy, Hanumappa
Hegde, Vinayaka
Mishra, Ajay Kumar
author_facet Patil, Balanagouda
Sridhara, Shankarappa
Narayanaswamy, Hanumappa
Hegde, Vinayaka
Mishra, Ajay Kumar
author_sort Patil, Balanagouda
collection PubMed
description Fruit rot disease (FRD) in arecanut has appeared in most of the arecanut growing regions of India in the last few decades. A few comprehensive studies on the management of FRD under field conditions have examined various treatment combinations for disease control and yield response analysis. This study aimed to compare the control efficiencies and yield responses of treatments applied over multiple locations and compute the probable returns of investment (ROIs) for treatment costs. Data were gathered from 21 field trials conducted across five main arecanut growing regions of India in the period 2012–2019. The collected data were subjected to analysis with a multivariate (network) meta-analytical model, following standard statistical protocols. The quantitative, synthesized data were evaluated for the estimated effects of disease pressure (DP(Low) ≤ 35% of FRD(Inc) in the treatments > DP(High)), mean disease control efficiencies (treatment mean, C), and yield responses (R) corresponding to the tested treatments. Based on disease control efficacy, the evaluated treatments were grouped into three efficacy groups (EGs): higher EGs were observed for the Bordeaux mixture (C, 81.94%) and its stabilized formulation (C, 74.99%), Metalaxyl + Mancozeb (C, 70.66%), while lower EGs were observed in plots treated with Biofight (C, 29.91%), Biopot (C, 25.66%), and Suraksha (C, 29.74%) and intermediate EGs were observed in plots to which microbial consortia (bio-agents) had been applied. Disease pressure acted as a significant moderator variable, influencing yield response and gain. At DP(Low), the Bordeaux fungicide mixture (102%, 22% of increased yield) and Metalaxyl + Mancozeb (77.5%, +15.5%) exhibited higher yield responses, with absolute arecanut yield gains of 916.5 kg ha(−1) and 884 kg ha(−1), while, under DP(High,) Fosetyl-AL (819.6 kg ha(−1)) showed a yield response of 90.5%. To ensure maximum yield sustainability, arecanut growers should focus on the spraying of fungicides (a mixture of different active ingredients or formulations or products) as a preventative measure, followed by treating palms with either soil microbial consortia or commercial formulations of organic fungicides.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9503749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95037492022-09-24 Control Efficiency and Yield Response of Chemical and Biological Treatments against Fruit Rot of Arecanut: A Network Meta-Analysis Patil, Balanagouda Sridhara, Shankarappa Narayanaswamy, Hanumappa Hegde, Vinayaka Mishra, Ajay Kumar J Fungi (Basel) Article Fruit rot disease (FRD) in arecanut has appeared in most of the arecanut growing regions of India in the last few decades. A few comprehensive studies on the management of FRD under field conditions have examined various treatment combinations for disease control and yield response analysis. This study aimed to compare the control efficiencies and yield responses of treatments applied over multiple locations and compute the probable returns of investment (ROIs) for treatment costs. Data were gathered from 21 field trials conducted across five main arecanut growing regions of India in the period 2012–2019. The collected data were subjected to analysis with a multivariate (network) meta-analytical model, following standard statistical protocols. The quantitative, synthesized data were evaluated for the estimated effects of disease pressure (DP(Low) ≤ 35% of FRD(Inc) in the treatments > DP(High)), mean disease control efficiencies (treatment mean, C), and yield responses (R) corresponding to the tested treatments. Based on disease control efficacy, the evaluated treatments were grouped into three efficacy groups (EGs): higher EGs were observed for the Bordeaux mixture (C, 81.94%) and its stabilized formulation (C, 74.99%), Metalaxyl + Mancozeb (C, 70.66%), while lower EGs were observed in plots treated with Biofight (C, 29.91%), Biopot (C, 25.66%), and Suraksha (C, 29.74%) and intermediate EGs were observed in plots to which microbial consortia (bio-agents) had been applied. Disease pressure acted as a significant moderator variable, influencing yield response and gain. At DP(Low), the Bordeaux fungicide mixture (102%, 22% of increased yield) and Metalaxyl + Mancozeb (77.5%, +15.5%) exhibited higher yield responses, with absolute arecanut yield gains of 916.5 kg ha(−1) and 884 kg ha(−1), while, under DP(High,) Fosetyl-AL (819.6 kg ha(−1)) showed a yield response of 90.5%. To ensure maximum yield sustainability, arecanut growers should focus on the spraying of fungicides (a mixture of different active ingredients or formulations or products) as a preventative measure, followed by treating palms with either soil microbial consortia or commercial formulations of organic fungicides. MDPI 2022-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9503749/ /pubmed/36135662 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8090937 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Patil, Balanagouda
Sridhara, Shankarappa
Narayanaswamy, Hanumappa
Hegde, Vinayaka
Mishra, Ajay Kumar
Control Efficiency and Yield Response of Chemical and Biological Treatments against Fruit Rot of Arecanut: A Network Meta-Analysis
title Control Efficiency and Yield Response of Chemical and Biological Treatments against Fruit Rot of Arecanut: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_full Control Efficiency and Yield Response of Chemical and Biological Treatments against Fruit Rot of Arecanut: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Control Efficiency and Yield Response of Chemical and Biological Treatments against Fruit Rot of Arecanut: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Control Efficiency and Yield Response of Chemical and Biological Treatments against Fruit Rot of Arecanut: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_short Control Efficiency and Yield Response of Chemical and Biological Treatments against Fruit Rot of Arecanut: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_sort control efficiency and yield response of chemical and biological treatments against fruit rot of arecanut: a network meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36135662
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8090937
work_keys_str_mv AT patilbalanagouda controlefficiencyandyieldresponseofchemicalandbiologicaltreatmentsagainstfruitrotofarecanutanetworkmetaanalysis
AT sridharashankarappa controlefficiencyandyieldresponseofchemicalandbiologicaltreatmentsagainstfruitrotofarecanutanetworkmetaanalysis
AT narayanaswamyhanumappa controlefficiencyandyieldresponseofchemicalandbiologicaltreatmentsagainstfruitrotofarecanutanetworkmetaanalysis
AT hegdevinayaka controlefficiencyandyieldresponseofchemicalandbiologicaltreatmentsagainstfruitrotofarecanutanetworkmetaanalysis
AT mishraajaykumar controlefficiencyandyieldresponseofchemicalandbiologicaltreatmentsagainstfruitrotofarecanutanetworkmetaanalysis