Cargando…

Development of Test Methods to Evaluate the Printability of Concrete Materials for Additive Manufacturing

This study proposes test methods for assessing the printability of concrete materials for Additive Manufacturing. The printability of concrete is divided into three main aspects: flowability, setting time, and buildability. These properties are considered to monitor the critical quality of 3DCP and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mortada, Youssef, Mohammad, Malek, Mansoor, Bilal, Grasley, Zachary, Masad, Eyad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143800
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15186486
_version_ 1784796085452013568
author Mortada, Youssef
Mohammad, Malek
Mansoor, Bilal
Grasley, Zachary
Masad, Eyad
author_facet Mortada, Youssef
Mohammad, Malek
Mansoor, Bilal
Grasley, Zachary
Masad, Eyad
author_sort Mortada, Youssef
collection PubMed
description This study proposes test methods for assessing the printability of concrete materials for Additive Manufacturing. The printability of concrete is divided into three main aspects: flowability, setting time, and buildability. These properties are considered to monitor the critical quality of 3DCP and to ensure a successful print. Flowability is evaluated through a rheometer test, where the evolution of shear yield strength is monitored at a constant rate (rpm), similar to the printer setup. Flowability limits were set based on the user-defined maximum thickness of a printed layer and the onset of gaps/cracks during printing. Setting time is evaluated through an ultrasonic wave pulse velocity test (UPV), where the first inflection point of the evolution of the UPV graph corresponds to the setting time of the concrete specimen. The results from this continuous non-destructive test were found to correlate with the results from the discrete destructive ASTM C-191 test for measuring setting time with a maximum difference of 5% between both sets of values. Lastly, buildability was evaluated through the measurement of the early-age compressive strength of concrete, and a correlation with the UPV results obtained a predictive model that can be used in real-time to non-destructively assess the material buildability. This predictive model had a maximum percentage difference of 13% with the measured values. The outcome of this study is a set of tests to evaluate the properties of 3D printable concrete (3DP) material and provide a basis for a framework to benchmark and design materials for additive manufacturing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9503919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95039192022-09-24 Development of Test Methods to Evaluate the Printability of Concrete Materials for Additive Manufacturing Mortada, Youssef Mohammad, Malek Mansoor, Bilal Grasley, Zachary Masad, Eyad Materials (Basel) Article This study proposes test methods for assessing the printability of concrete materials for Additive Manufacturing. The printability of concrete is divided into three main aspects: flowability, setting time, and buildability. These properties are considered to monitor the critical quality of 3DCP and to ensure a successful print. Flowability is evaluated through a rheometer test, where the evolution of shear yield strength is monitored at a constant rate (rpm), similar to the printer setup. Flowability limits were set based on the user-defined maximum thickness of a printed layer and the onset of gaps/cracks during printing. Setting time is evaluated through an ultrasonic wave pulse velocity test (UPV), where the first inflection point of the evolution of the UPV graph corresponds to the setting time of the concrete specimen. The results from this continuous non-destructive test were found to correlate with the results from the discrete destructive ASTM C-191 test for measuring setting time with a maximum difference of 5% between both sets of values. Lastly, buildability was evaluated through the measurement of the early-age compressive strength of concrete, and a correlation with the UPV results obtained a predictive model that can be used in real-time to non-destructively assess the material buildability. This predictive model had a maximum percentage difference of 13% with the measured values. The outcome of this study is a set of tests to evaluate the properties of 3D printable concrete (3DP) material and provide a basis for a framework to benchmark and design materials for additive manufacturing. MDPI 2022-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9503919/ /pubmed/36143800 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15186486 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mortada, Youssef
Mohammad, Malek
Mansoor, Bilal
Grasley, Zachary
Masad, Eyad
Development of Test Methods to Evaluate the Printability of Concrete Materials for Additive Manufacturing
title Development of Test Methods to Evaluate the Printability of Concrete Materials for Additive Manufacturing
title_full Development of Test Methods to Evaluate the Printability of Concrete Materials for Additive Manufacturing
title_fullStr Development of Test Methods to Evaluate the Printability of Concrete Materials for Additive Manufacturing
title_full_unstemmed Development of Test Methods to Evaluate the Printability of Concrete Materials for Additive Manufacturing
title_short Development of Test Methods to Evaluate the Printability of Concrete Materials for Additive Manufacturing
title_sort development of test methods to evaluate the printability of concrete materials for additive manufacturing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143800
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15186486
work_keys_str_mv AT mortadayoussef developmentoftestmethodstoevaluatetheprintabilityofconcretematerialsforadditivemanufacturing
AT mohammadmalek developmentoftestmethodstoevaluatetheprintabilityofconcretematerialsforadditivemanufacturing
AT mansoorbilal developmentoftestmethodstoevaluatetheprintabilityofconcretematerialsforadditivemanufacturing
AT grasleyzachary developmentoftestmethodstoevaluatetheprintabilityofconcretematerialsforadditivemanufacturing
AT masadeyad developmentoftestmethodstoevaluatetheprintabilityofconcretematerialsforadditivemanufacturing