Cargando…
Comparison of Titanium and PEEK Medical Plastic Implant Materials for Their Bacterial Biofilm Formation Properties
This study investigated two of the most commonly used CAD–CAM materials for patient-specific reconstruction in craniomaxillofacial surgery. The aim of this study was to access the biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans, Enterococcus faecalis, and Escherichia coli on titaniu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9504047/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36146003 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14183862 |
_version_ | 1784796117996666880 |
---|---|
author | Sarfraz, Sonia Mäntynen, Pilvi-Helinä Laurila, Marisa Rossi, Sami Leikola, Junnu Kaakinen, Mika Suojanen, Juho Reunanen, Justus |
author_facet | Sarfraz, Sonia Mäntynen, Pilvi-Helinä Laurila, Marisa Rossi, Sami Leikola, Junnu Kaakinen, Mika Suojanen, Juho Reunanen, Justus |
author_sort | Sarfraz, Sonia |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study investigated two of the most commonly used CAD–CAM materials for patient-specific reconstruction in craniomaxillofacial surgery. The aim of this study was to access the biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans, Enterococcus faecalis, and Escherichia coli on titanium and PEEK medical implant materials. Two titanium specimens (titanium grade 2 tooled with a Planmeca CAD–CAM milling device and titanium grade 5 tooled with a computer-aided design direct metal laser sintering device (CAD-DMLS)) and one PEEK specimen tooled with a Planmeca CAD–CAM milling device were studied. Bacterial adhesion on implants was evaluated in two groups (saliva-treated group and non-saliva-treated group) to imitate intraoral and extraoral surgical routes for implant placement. The PEEK medical implant material showed higher bacterial adhesion by S. aureus, S. mutans, and E. coli than titanium grade 2 and titanium grade 5, whereas E. faecalis showed higher adhesion to titanium as compared to PEEK. Saliva contamination of implants also effected bacterial attachment. Salivary coating enhanced biofilm formation by S. aureus, S. mutans, and E. faecalis. In conclusion, our findings imply that regardless of the implant material type or tooling techniques used, salivary coating plays a vital role in bacterial adhesion. In addition, the majority of the bacterial strains showed higher adhesion to PEEK than titanium. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9504047 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95040472022-09-24 Comparison of Titanium and PEEK Medical Plastic Implant Materials for Their Bacterial Biofilm Formation Properties Sarfraz, Sonia Mäntynen, Pilvi-Helinä Laurila, Marisa Rossi, Sami Leikola, Junnu Kaakinen, Mika Suojanen, Juho Reunanen, Justus Polymers (Basel) Article This study investigated two of the most commonly used CAD–CAM materials for patient-specific reconstruction in craniomaxillofacial surgery. The aim of this study was to access the biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans, Enterococcus faecalis, and Escherichia coli on titanium and PEEK medical implant materials. Two titanium specimens (titanium grade 2 tooled with a Planmeca CAD–CAM milling device and titanium grade 5 tooled with a computer-aided design direct metal laser sintering device (CAD-DMLS)) and one PEEK specimen tooled with a Planmeca CAD–CAM milling device were studied. Bacterial adhesion on implants was evaluated in two groups (saliva-treated group and non-saliva-treated group) to imitate intraoral and extraoral surgical routes for implant placement. The PEEK medical implant material showed higher bacterial adhesion by S. aureus, S. mutans, and E. coli than titanium grade 2 and titanium grade 5, whereas E. faecalis showed higher adhesion to titanium as compared to PEEK. Saliva contamination of implants also effected bacterial attachment. Salivary coating enhanced biofilm formation by S. aureus, S. mutans, and E. faecalis. In conclusion, our findings imply that regardless of the implant material type or tooling techniques used, salivary coating plays a vital role in bacterial adhesion. In addition, the majority of the bacterial strains showed higher adhesion to PEEK than titanium. MDPI 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9504047/ /pubmed/36146003 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14183862 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sarfraz, Sonia Mäntynen, Pilvi-Helinä Laurila, Marisa Rossi, Sami Leikola, Junnu Kaakinen, Mika Suojanen, Juho Reunanen, Justus Comparison of Titanium and PEEK Medical Plastic Implant Materials for Their Bacterial Biofilm Formation Properties |
title | Comparison of Titanium and PEEK Medical Plastic Implant Materials for Their Bacterial Biofilm Formation Properties |
title_full | Comparison of Titanium and PEEK Medical Plastic Implant Materials for Their Bacterial Biofilm Formation Properties |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Titanium and PEEK Medical Plastic Implant Materials for Their Bacterial Biofilm Formation Properties |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Titanium and PEEK Medical Plastic Implant Materials for Their Bacterial Biofilm Formation Properties |
title_short | Comparison of Titanium and PEEK Medical Plastic Implant Materials for Their Bacterial Biofilm Formation Properties |
title_sort | comparison of titanium and peek medical plastic implant materials for their bacterial biofilm formation properties |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9504047/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36146003 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14183862 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sarfrazsonia comparisonoftitaniumandpeekmedicalplasticimplantmaterialsfortheirbacterialbiofilmformationproperties AT mantynenpilvihelina comparisonoftitaniumandpeekmedicalplasticimplantmaterialsfortheirbacterialbiofilmformationproperties AT laurilamarisa comparisonoftitaniumandpeekmedicalplasticimplantmaterialsfortheirbacterialbiofilmformationproperties AT rossisami comparisonoftitaniumandpeekmedicalplasticimplantmaterialsfortheirbacterialbiofilmformationproperties AT leikolajunnu comparisonoftitaniumandpeekmedicalplasticimplantmaterialsfortheirbacterialbiofilmformationproperties AT kaakinenmika comparisonoftitaniumandpeekmedicalplasticimplantmaterialsfortheirbacterialbiofilmformationproperties AT suojanenjuho comparisonoftitaniumandpeekmedicalplasticimplantmaterialsfortheirbacterialbiofilmformationproperties AT reunanenjustus comparisonoftitaniumandpeekmedicalplasticimplantmaterialsfortheirbacterialbiofilmformationproperties |