Cargando…
A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Background and Objective: Gingival biotype can be assessed using a variety of invasive and non-invasive procedures, such as direct probing, transgingival probing, ultrasound-guided approaches, and, for the more sophisticated, cone-beam computed tomography. The aim of this study was to evaluate gingi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9504133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143989 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58091312 |
_version_ | 1784796139023761408 |
---|---|
author | Das, Gotam Ahmed, Abdul Razzaq Suleman, Ghazala Lal, Abhishek Rana, Muhammad Haseeb Ahmed, Naseer Arora, Suraj |
author_facet | Das, Gotam Ahmed, Abdul Razzaq Suleman, Ghazala Lal, Abhishek Rana, Muhammad Haseeb Ahmed, Naseer Arora, Suraj |
author_sort | Das, Gotam |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Objective: Gingival biotype can be assessed using a variety of invasive and non-invasive procedures, such as direct probing, transgingival probing, ultrasound-guided approaches, and, for the more sophisticated, cone-beam computed tomography. The aim of this study was to evaluate gingival biotype in relation to transgingival probing and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: This study included a total of two hundred healthy individuals. Gingival thickness was assessed and measured from the right and left maxillary central incisor teeth using CBCT and transgingival probing of the attached gingiva. The measurements were analyzed with regard to tooth type (central incisor). Linear measurements for gingival biotype were measured using both methods. Correlations and differences between measurement methods were assessed. Results: The mean age of study participants was 32.49 ± 8.61 years. The radiographic measurements on CBCT were 1.34 ± 0.17 mm for the right central and 1.28 ± 0.21mm for the left central. The transgingival probing measurements were 1.31 ± 0.18 for the right central and 1.22 ± 0.21mm for the left central. Conclusion: As per the results of this study, there is a significant positive correlation between transgingival probing and CBCT measurements of gingival biotypes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9504133 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95041332022-09-24 A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Das, Gotam Ahmed, Abdul Razzaq Suleman, Ghazala Lal, Abhishek Rana, Muhammad Haseeb Ahmed, Naseer Arora, Suraj Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objective: Gingival biotype can be assessed using a variety of invasive and non-invasive procedures, such as direct probing, transgingival probing, ultrasound-guided approaches, and, for the more sophisticated, cone-beam computed tomography. The aim of this study was to evaluate gingival biotype in relation to transgingival probing and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: This study included a total of two hundred healthy individuals. Gingival thickness was assessed and measured from the right and left maxillary central incisor teeth using CBCT and transgingival probing of the attached gingiva. The measurements were analyzed with regard to tooth type (central incisor). Linear measurements for gingival biotype were measured using both methods. Correlations and differences between measurement methods were assessed. Results: The mean age of study participants was 32.49 ± 8.61 years. The radiographic measurements on CBCT were 1.34 ± 0.17 mm for the right central and 1.28 ± 0.21mm for the left central. The transgingival probing measurements were 1.31 ± 0.18 for the right central and 1.22 ± 0.21mm for the left central. Conclusion: As per the results of this study, there is a significant positive correlation between transgingival probing and CBCT measurements of gingival biotypes. MDPI 2022-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9504133/ /pubmed/36143989 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58091312 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Das, Gotam Ahmed, Abdul Razzaq Suleman, Ghazala Lal, Abhishek Rana, Muhammad Haseeb Ahmed, Naseer Arora, Suraj A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
title | A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
title_full | A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
title_short | A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of dentogingival tissue using transgingival probing and cone-beam computed tomography |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9504133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143989 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58091312 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dasgotam acomparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT ahmedabdulrazzaq acomparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT sulemanghazala acomparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT lalabhishek acomparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT ranamuhammadhaseeb acomparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT ahmednaseer acomparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT arorasuraj acomparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT dasgotam comparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT ahmedabdulrazzaq comparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT sulemanghazala comparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT lalabhishek comparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT ranamuhammadhaseeb comparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT ahmednaseer comparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT arorasuraj comparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography |