Cargando…

Helicate versus Mesocate in Quadruple-Stranded Lanthanide Cages: A Computational Insight

To drive the synthesis of metallo-supramolecular assemblies (MSAs) and to fully exploit their functional properties, robust computational tools are crucial. The capability to model and to rationalize different parameters that can influence the outcome is mandatory. Here, we report a computational in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carlotto, Silvia, Armelao, Lidia, Rancan, Marzio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9504305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36142519
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810619
_version_ 1784796182348824576
author Carlotto, Silvia
Armelao, Lidia
Rancan, Marzio
author_facet Carlotto, Silvia
Armelao, Lidia
Rancan, Marzio
author_sort Carlotto, Silvia
collection PubMed
description To drive the synthesis of metallo-supramolecular assemblies (MSAs) and to fully exploit their functional properties, robust computational tools are crucial. The capability to model and to rationalize different parameters that can influence the outcome is mandatory. Here, we report a computational insight on the factors that can determine the relative stability of the supramolecular isomers helicate and mesocate in lanthanide-based quadruple-stranded assemblies. The considered MSAs have the general formula [Ln(2)L(4)](2−) and possess a cavity suitable to allocate guests. The analysis was focused on three different factors: the ligand rigidity and the steric hindrance, the presence of a guest inside the cavity, and the guest dimension. Three different quantum mechanical calculation set-ups (in vacuum, with the solvent, and with the solvent and the dispersion correction) were considered. Comparison between theoretical and experimental outcomes suggests that all calculations correctly estimated the most stable isomer, while the inclusion of the dispersion correction is mandatory to reproduce the geometrical parameters. General guidelines can be drawn: less rigid and less bulky is the ligand and less stable is the helicate, and the presence of a guest can strongly affect the isomerism leading to an inversion of the stability by increasing the guest size when the ligand is flexible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9504305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95043052022-09-24 Helicate versus Mesocate in Quadruple-Stranded Lanthanide Cages: A Computational Insight Carlotto, Silvia Armelao, Lidia Rancan, Marzio Int J Mol Sci Article To drive the synthesis of metallo-supramolecular assemblies (MSAs) and to fully exploit their functional properties, robust computational tools are crucial. The capability to model and to rationalize different parameters that can influence the outcome is mandatory. Here, we report a computational insight on the factors that can determine the relative stability of the supramolecular isomers helicate and mesocate in lanthanide-based quadruple-stranded assemblies. The considered MSAs have the general formula [Ln(2)L(4)](2−) and possess a cavity suitable to allocate guests. The analysis was focused on three different factors: the ligand rigidity and the steric hindrance, the presence of a guest inside the cavity, and the guest dimension. Three different quantum mechanical calculation set-ups (in vacuum, with the solvent, and with the solvent and the dispersion correction) were considered. Comparison between theoretical and experimental outcomes suggests that all calculations correctly estimated the most stable isomer, while the inclusion of the dispersion correction is mandatory to reproduce the geometrical parameters. General guidelines can be drawn: less rigid and less bulky is the ligand and less stable is the helicate, and the presence of a guest can strongly affect the isomerism leading to an inversion of the stability by increasing the guest size when the ligand is flexible. MDPI 2022-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9504305/ /pubmed/36142519 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810619 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Carlotto, Silvia
Armelao, Lidia
Rancan, Marzio
Helicate versus Mesocate in Quadruple-Stranded Lanthanide Cages: A Computational Insight
title Helicate versus Mesocate in Quadruple-Stranded Lanthanide Cages: A Computational Insight
title_full Helicate versus Mesocate in Quadruple-Stranded Lanthanide Cages: A Computational Insight
title_fullStr Helicate versus Mesocate in Quadruple-Stranded Lanthanide Cages: A Computational Insight
title_full_unstemmed Helicate versus Mesocate in Quadruple-Stranded Lanthanide Cages: A Computational Insight
title_short Helicate versus Mesocate in Quadruple-Stranded Lanthanide Cages: A Computational Insight
title_sort helicate versus mesocate in quadruple-stranded lanthanide cages: a computational insight
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9504305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36142519
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810619
work_keys_str_mv AT carlottosilvia helicateversusmesocateinquadruplestrandedlanthanidecagesacomputationalinsight
AT armelaolidia helicateversusmesocateinquadruplestrandedlanthanidecagesacomputationalinsight
AT rancanmarzio helicateversusmesocateinquadruplestrandedlanthanidecagesacomputationalinsight