Cargando…
Influence of Abutment Design on Biomechanical Behavior to Support a Screw-Retained 3-Unit Fixed Partial Denture
This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of Morse taper implants using different abutments (CMN abutment [(CMN Group] and miniconical abutments [MC Group]), indicated to support a screw-retained 3-unit fixed partial denture. For the in vitro test, polyurethane blocks were fabricated f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9504379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143553 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15186235 |
_version_ | 1784796201388867584 |
---|---|
author | Lopes, Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer de Matos, Jefferson David Melo Queiroz, Daher Antonio Tribst, João Paulo Mendes Ramos, Nathália de Carvalho Rocha, Mateus Garcia Barbosa, Adriano Baldotto Bottino, Marco Antonio Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto Nishioka, Renato Sussumu |
author_facet | Lopes, Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer de Matos, Jefferson David Melo Queiroz, Daher Antonio Tribst, João Paulo Mendes Ramos, Nathália de Carvalho Rocha, Mateus Garcia Barbosa, Adriano Baldotto Bottino, Marco Antonio Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto Nishioka, Renato Sussumu |
author_sort | Lopes, Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of Morse taper implants using different abutments (CMN abutment [(CMN Group] and miniconical abutments [MC Group]), indicated to support a screw-retained 3-unit fixed partial denture. For the in vitro test, polyurethane blocks were fabricated for both groups (n = 10) and received three implants in the “offset” configuration and their respective abutments (CMN or MC) with a 3-unit fixed partial denture. Four strain gauges were bonded to the surface of each block. For the finite element analysis, 3D models of both groups were created and exported to the analysis software to perform static structural analysis. All structures were considered homogeneous, isotropic, and elastic. The contacts were considered non-linear with a friction coefficient of 0.3 between metallic structures and considered bonded between the implant and substrate. An axial load of 300 N was applied in three points (A, B, and C) for both methods. The microstrain and the maximum principal stress were considered as analysis criteria. The obtained data were submitted to the Mann–Whitney, Kruskal–Wallis, and Dunn’s multiple comparison test (α = 5%). The results obtained by strain gauge showed no statistical difference (p = 0.879) between the CMN (645.3 ± 309.2 με) and MC (639.3 ± 278.8 με) and allowed the validation of computational models with a difference of 6.3% and 6.4% for the microstrains in the CMN and MC groups, respectively. Similarly, the results presented by the computational models showed no statistical difference (p = 0.932) for the CMN (605.1 ± 358.6 με) and MC (598.7 ± 357.9 με) groups. The study concluded that under favorable conditions the use of CMN or MP abutments to support a fixed partial denture can be indicated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9504379 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95043792022-09-24 Influence of Abutment Design on Biomechanical Behavior to Support a Screw-Retained 3-Unit Fixed Partial Denture Lopes, Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer de Matos, Jefferson David Melo Queiroz, Daher Antonio Tribst, João Paulo Mendes Ramos, Nathália de Carvalho Rocha, Mateus Garcia Barbosa, Adriano Baldotto Bottino, Marco Antonio Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto Nishioka, Renato Sussumu Materials (Basel) Article This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of Morse taper implants using different abutments (CMN abutment [(CMN Group] and miniconical abutments [MC Group]), indicated to support a screw-retained 3-unit fixed partial denture. For the in vitro test, polyurethane blocks were fabricated for both groups (n = 10) and received three implants in the “offset” configuration and their respective abutments (CMN or MC) with a 3-unit fixed partial denture. Four strain gauges were bonded to the surface of each block. For the finite element analysis, 3D models of both groups were created and exported to the analysis software to perform static structural analysis. All structures were considered homogeneous, isotropic, and elastic. The contacts were considered non-linear with a friction coefficient of 0.3 between metallic structures and considered bonded between the implant and substrate. An axial load of 300 N was applied in three points (A, B, and C) for both methods. The microstrain and the maximum principal stress were considered as analysis criteria. The obtained data were submitted to the Mann–Whitney, Kruskal–Wallis, and Dunn’s multiple comparison test (α = 5%). The results obtained by strain gauge showed no statistical difference (p = 0.879) between the CMN (645.3 ± 309.2 με) and MC (639.3 ± 278.8 με) and allowed the validation of computational models with a difference of 6.3% and 6.4% for the microstrains in the CMN and MC groups, respectively. Similarly, the results presented by the computational models showed no statistical difference (p = 0.932) for the CMN (605.1 ± 358.6 με) and MC (598.7 ± 357.9 με) groups. The study concluded that under favorable conditions the use of CMN or MP abutments to support a fixed partial denture can be indicated. MDPI 2022-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9504379/ /pubmed/36143553 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15186235 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lopes, Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer de Matos, Jefferson David Melo Queiroz, Daher Antonio Tribst, João Paulo Mendes Ramos, Nathália de Carvalho Rocha, Mateus Garcia Barbosa, Adriano Baldotto Bottino, Marco Antonio Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto Nishioka, Renato Sussumu Influence of Abutment Design on Biomechanical Behavior to Support a Screw-Retained 3-Unit Fixed Partial Denture |
title | Influence of Abutment Design on Biomechanical Behavior to Support a Screw-Retained 3-Unit Fixed Partial Denture |
title_full | Influence of Abutment Design on Biomechanical Behavior to Support a Screw-Retained 3-Unit Fixed Partial Denture |
title_fullStr | Influence of Abutment Design on Biomechanical Behavior to Support a Screw-Retained 3-Unit Fixed Partial Denture |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of Abutment Design on Biomechanical Behavior to Support a Screw-Retained 3-Unit Fixed Partial Denture |
title_short | Influence of Abutment Design on Biomechanical Behavior to Support a Screw-Retained 3-Unit Fixed Partial Denture |
title_sort | influence of abutment design on biomechanical behavior to support a screw-retained 3-unit fixed partial denture |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9504379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143553 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15186235 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lopesguilhermedarochascalzer influenceofabutmentdesignonbiomechanicalbehaviortosupportascrewretained3unitfixedpartialdenture AT dematosjeffersondavidmelo influenceofabutmentdesignonbiomechanicalbehaviortosupportascrewretained3unitfixedpartialdenture AT queirozdaherantonio influenceofabutmentdesignonbiomechanicalbehaviortosupportascrewretained3unitfixedpartialdenture AT tribstjoaopaulomendes influenceofabutmentdesignonbiomechanicalbehaviortosupportascrewretained3unitfixedpartialdenture AT ramosnathaliadecarvalho influenceofabutmentdesignonbiomechanicalbehaviortosupportascrewretained3unitfixedpartialdenture AT rochamateusgarcia influenceofabutmentdesignonbiomechanicalbehaviortosupportascrewretained3unitfixedpartialdenture AT barbosaadrianobaldotto influenceofabutmentdesignonbiomechanicalbehaviortosupportascrewretained3unitfixedpartialdenture AT bottinomarcoantonio influenceofabutmentdesignonbiomechanicalbehaviortosupportascrewretained3unitfixedpartialdenture AT borgesalexandreluizsouto influenceofabutmentdesignonbiomechanicalbehaviortosupportascrewretained3unitfixedpartialdenture AT nishiokarenatosussumu influenceofabutmentdesignonbiomechanicalbehaviortosupportascrewretained3unitfixedpartialdenture |