Cargando…

Response to Anti-PD1/L1 Antibodies in Advanced Urothelial Cancer in the ‘Real-Life’ Setting

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now the standard of care for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients. Our aim was to describe the activity of ICIs in mUC and find the clinical parameters associated with response. This is a retrospective, single-center chart review of mUC patients rece...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gadot, Moran, Arad, Ido, Atenafu, Eshetu G., Levartovsky, Meital, Portnoy, Orith, Davidson, Tima, Schor-Bardach, Rachel, Berger, Raanan, Leibowitz, Raya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9504505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36145376
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph15091154
_version_ 1784796233766797312
author Gadot, Moran
Arad, Ido
Atenafu, Eshetu G.
Levartovsky, Meital
Portnoy, Orith
Davidson, Tima
Schor-Bardach, Rachel
Berger, Raanan
Leibowitz, Raya
author_facet Gadot, Moran
Arad, Ido
Atenafu, Eshetu G.
Levartovsky, Meital
Portnoy, Orith
Davidson, Tima
Schor-Bardach, Rachel
Berger, Raanan
Leibowitz, Raya
author_sort Gadot, Moran
collection PubMed
description Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now the standard of care for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients. Our aim was to describe the activity of ICIs in mUC and find the clinical parameters associated with response. This is a retrospective, single-center chart review of mUC patients receiving ICIs. The overall survival (OS) was plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method and was compared using a log-rank test. Associations between the variables and responses were analyzed by univariate and multivariable analyses, using either logistic regression or a Chi-square/Fisher’s exact test. Ninety-four patients received ICIs, 85% of which were in the second line or beyond; the median age was 71.8 years, and 82% were men. Six (6.4%), 11 (11.7%), 7 (7.4%) and 70 (74.5%) patients achieved a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), mixed response/stable disease (M/SD) or progressive disease (PD), respectively. The median overall survival was 3.2 months for the entire cohort and was significantly different according to the response pattern—not reached, 32.3, 6.4 and 2.0 months for CR, PR, M/SD and PD, respectively. The response was not significantly associated with the line of treatment. ‘Site of metastasis’ was associated with the response, and the absolute neutrophil count was borderline associated with the response. In summary, we found a substantial variance in the potential benefit from ICIs in mUC, emphasizing the need for predictive biomarkers and frequent monitoring of mUC patients receiving ICIs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9504505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95045052022-09-24 Response to Anti-PD1/L1 Antibodies in Advanced Urothelial Cancer in the ‘Real-Life’ Setting Gadot, Moran Arad, Ido Atenafu, Eshetu G. Levartovsky, Meital Portnoy, Orith Davidson, Tima Schor-Bardach, Rachel Berger, Raanan Leibowitz, Raya Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Article Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now the standard of care for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients. Our aim was to describe the activity of ICIs in mUC and find the clinical parameters associated with response. This is a retrospective, single-center chart review of mUC patients receiving ICIs. The overall survival (OS) was plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method and was compared using a log-rank test. Associations between the variables and responses were analyzed by univariate and multivariable analyses, using either logistic regression or a Chi-square/Fisher’s exact test. Ninety-four patients received ICIs, 85% of which were in the second line or beyond; the median age was 71.8 years, and 82% were men. Six (6.4%), 11 (11.7%), 7 (7.4%) and 70 (74.5%) patients achieved a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), mixed response/stable disease (M/SD) or progressive disease (PD), respectively. The median overall survival was 3.2 months for the entire cohort and was significantly different according to the response pattern—not reached, 32.3, 6.4 and 2.0 months for CR, PR, M/SD and PD, respectively. The response was not significantly associated with the line of treatment. ‘Site of metastasis’ was associated with the response, and the absolute neutrophil count was borderline associated with the response. In summary, we found a substantial variance in the potential benefit from ICIs in mUC, emphasizing the need for predictive biomarkers and frequent monitoring of mUC patients receiving ICIs. MDPI 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9504505/ /pubmed/36145376 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph15091154 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gadot, Moran
Arad, Ido
Atenafu, Eshetu G.
Levartovsky, Meital
Portnoy, Orith
Davidson, Tima
Schor-Bardach, Rachel
Berger, Raanan
Leibowitz, Raya
Response to Anti-PD1/L1 Antibodies in Advanced Urothelial Cancer in the ‘Real-Life’ Setting
title Response to Anti-PD1/L1 Antibodies in Advanced Urothelial Cancer in the ‘Real-Life’ Setting
title_full Response to Anti-PD1/L1 Antibodies in Advanced Urothelial Cancer in the ‘Real-Life’ Setting
title_fullStr Response to Anti-PD1/L1 Antibodies in Advanced Urothelial Cancer in the ‘Real-Life’ Setting
title_full_unstemmed Response to Anti-PD1/L1 Antibodies in Advanced Urothelial Cancer in the ‘Real-Life’ Setting
title_short Response to Anti-PD1/L1 Antibodies in Advanced Urothelial Cancer in the ‘Real-Life’ Setting
title_sort response to anti-pd1/l1 antibodies in advanced urothelial cancer in the ‘real-life’ setting
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9504505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36145376
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph15091154
work_keys_str_mv AT gadotmoran responsetoantipd1l1antibodiesinadvancedurothelialcancerinthereallifesetting
AT aradido responsetoantipd1l1antibodiesinadvancedurothelialcancerinthereallifesetting
AT atenafueshetug responsetoantipd1l1antibodiesinadvancedurothelialcancerinthereallifesetting
AT levartovskymeital responsetoantipd1l1antibodiesinadvancedurothelialcancerinthereallifesetting
AT portnoyorith responsetoantipd1l1antibodiesinadvancedurothelialcancerinthereallifesetting
AT davidsontima responsetoantipd1l1antibodiesinadvancedurothelialcancerinthereallifesetting
AT schorbardachrachel responsetoantipd1l1antibodiesinadvancedurothelialcancerinthereallifesetting
AT bergerraanan responsetoantipd1l1antibodiesinadvancedurothelialcancerinthereallifesetting
AT leibowitzraya responsetoantipd1l1antibodiesinadvancedurothelialcancerinthereallifesetting