Cargando…
Response to Anti-PD1/L1 Antibodies in Advanced Urothelial Cancer in the ‘Real-Life’ Setting
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now the standard of care for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients. Our aim was to describe the activity of ICIs in mUC and find the clinical parameters associated with response. This is a retrospective, single-center chart review of mUC patients rece...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9504505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36145376 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph15091154 |
_version_ | 1784796233766797312 |
---|---|
author | Gadot, Moran Arad, Ido Atenafu, Eshetu G. Levartovsky, Meital Portnoy, Orith Davidson, Tima Schor-Bardach, Rachel Berger, Raanan Leibowitz, Raya |
author_facet | Gadot, Moran Arad, Ido Atenafu, Eshetu G. Levartovsky, Meital Portnoy, Orith Davidson, Tima Schor-Bardach, Rachel Berger, Raanan Leibowitz, Raya |
author_sort | Gadot, Moran |
collection | PubMed |
description | Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now the standard of care for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients. Our aim was to describe the activity of ICIs in mUC and find the clinical parameters associated with response. This is a retrospective, single-center chart review of mUC patients receiving ICIs. The overall survival (OS) was plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method and was compared using a log-rank test. Associations between the variables and responses were analyzed by univariate and multivariable analyses, using either logistic regression or a Chi-square/Fisher’s exact test. Ninety-four patients received ICIs, 85% of which were in the second line or beyond; the median age was 71.8 years, and 82% were men. Six (6.4%), 11 (11.7%), 7 (7.4%) and 70 (74.5%) patients achieved a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), mixed response/stable disease (M/SD) or progressive disease (PD), respectively. The median overall survival was 3.2 months for the entire cohort and was significantly different according to the response pattern—not reached, 32.3, 6.4 and 2.0 months for CR, PR, M/SD and PD, respectively. The response was not significantly associated with the line of treatment. ‘Site of metastasis’ was associated with the response, and the absolute neutrophil count was borderline associated with the response. In summary, we found a substantial variance in the potential benefit from ICIs in mUC, emphasizing the need for predictive biomarkers and frequent monitoring of mUC patients receiving ICIs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9504505 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95045052022-09-24 Response to Anti-PD1/L1 Antibodies in Advanced Urothelial Cancer in the ‘Real-Life’ Setting Gadot, Moran Arad, Ido Atenafu, Eshetu G. Levartovsky, Meital Portnoy, Orith Davidson, Tima Schor-Bardach, Rachel Berger, Raanan Leibowitz, Raya Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Article Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now the standard of care for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients. Our aim was to describe the activity of ICIs in mUC and find the clinical parameters associated with response. This is a retrospective, single-center chart review of mUC patients receiving ICIs. The overall survival (OS) was plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method and was compared using a log-rank test. Associations between the variables and responses were analyzed by univariate and multivariable analyses, using either logistic regression or a Chi-square/Fisher’s exact test. Ninety-four patients received ICIs, 85% of which were in the second line or beyond; the median age was 71.8 years, and 82% were men. Six (6.4%), 11 (11.7%), 7 (7.4%) and 70 (74.5%) patients achieved a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), mixed response/stable disease (M/SD) or progressive disease (PD), respectively. The median overall survival was 3.2 months for the entire cohort and was significantly different according to the response pattern—not reached, 32.3, 6.4 and 2.0 months for CR, PR, M/SD and PD, respectively. The response was not significantly associated with the line of treatment. ‘Site of metastasis’ was associated with the response, and the absolute neutrophil count was borderline associated with the response. In summary, we found a substantial variance in the potential benefit from ICIs in mUC, emphasizing the need for predictive biomarkers and frequent monitoring of mUC patients receiving ICIs. MDPI 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9504505/ /pubmed/36145376 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph15091154 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Gadot, Moran Arad, Ido Atenafu, Eshetu G. Levartovsky, Meital Portnoy, Orith Davidson, Tima Schor-Bardach, Rachel Berger, Raanan Leibowitz, Raya Response to Anti-PD1/L1 Antibodies in Advanced Urothelial Cancer in the ‘Real-Life’ Setting |
title | Response to Anti-PD1/L1 Antibodies in Advanced Urothelial Cancer in the ‘Real-Life’ Setting |
title_full | Response to Anti-PD1/L1 Antibodies in Advanced Urothelial Cancer in the ‘Real-Life’ Setting |
title_fullStr | Response to Anti-PD1/L1 Antibodies in Advanced Urothelial Cancer in the ‘Real-Life’ Setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Response to Anti-PD1/L1 Antibodies in Advanced Urothelial Cancer in the ‘Real-Life’ Setting |
title_short | Response to Anti-PD1/L1 Antibodies in Advanced Urothelial Cancer in the ‘Real-Life’ Setting |
title_sort | response to anti-pd1/l1 antibodies in advanced urothelial cancer in the ‘real-life’ setting |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9504505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36145376 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph15091154 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gadotmoran responsetoantipd1l1antibodiesinadvancedurothelialcancerinthereallifesetting AT aradido responsetoantipd1l1antibodiesinadvancedurothelialcancerinthereallifesetting AT atenafueshetug responsetoantipd1l1antibodiesinadvancedurothelialcancerinthereallifesetting AT levartovskymeital responsetoantipd1l1antibodiesinadvancedurothelialcancerinthereallifesetting AT portnoyorith responsetoantipd1l1antibodiesinadvancedurothelialcancerinthereallifesetting AT davidsontima responsetoantipd1l1antibodiesinadvancedurothelialcancerinthereallifesetting AT schorbardachrachel responsetoantipd1l1antibodiesinadvancedurothelialcancerinthereallifesetting AT bergerraanan responsetoantipd1l1antibodiesinadvancedurothelialcancerinthereallifesetting AT leibowitzraya responsetoantipd1l1antibodiesinadvancedurothelialcancerinthereallifesetting |