Cargando…
Critical Assessment of Membrane Technology Integration in a Coal-Fired Power Plant
Despite the many technologies for CO(2) capture (e.g., chemical or physical absorption or adsorption), researchers are looking to develop other technologies that can reduce CAPEX and OPEX costs as well as the energy requirements associated with their integration into thermal power plants. The aim of...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9504610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36135923 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12090904 |
_version_ | 1784796260055646208 |
---|---|
author | Alabid, Maytham Cormos, Calin-Cristian Dinca, Cristian |
author_facet | Alabid, Maytham Cormos, Calin-Cristian Dinca, Cristian |
author_sort | Alabid, Maytham |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite the many technologies for CO(2) capture (e.g., chemical or physical absorption or adsorption), researchers are looking to develop other technologies that can reduce CAPEX and OPEX costs as well as the energy requirements associated with their integration into thermal power plants. The aim of this paper was to analyze the technical and economic integration of spiral wound membranes in a coal-fired power plant with an installed capacity of 330 MW (the case of the Rovinari power plant—in Romania). The study modeled energy processes using CHEMCAD version 8.1 software and polymer membranes developed in the CO(2) Hybrid research project. Thus, different configurations such as a single membrane step with and without the use of a vacuum pump and two membrane steps placed in series were analyzed. In all cases, a compressor placed before the membrane system was considered. The use of two serialized stages allows for both high efficiency (minimum 90%) and CO(2) purity of a minimum of 95%. However, the overall plant efficiency decreased from 45.78 to 23.96% and the LCOE increased from 75.6 to 170 €/kWh. The energy consumption required to capture 1 kg of CO(2) is 2.46 MJ(el) and 4.52 MJ(th). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9504610 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95046102022-09-24 Critical Assessment of Membrane Technology Integration in a Coal-Fired Power Plant Alabid, Maytham Cormos, Calin-Cristian Dinca, Cristian Membranes (Basel) Article Despite the many technologies for CO(2) capture (e.g., chemical or physical absorption or adsorption), researchers are looking to develop other technologies that can reduce CAPEX and OPEX costs as well as the energy requirements associated with their integration into thermal power plants. The aim of this paper was to analyze the technical and economic integration of spiral wound membranes in a coal-fired power plant with an installed capacity of 330 MW (the case of the Rovinari power plant—in Romania). The study modeled energy processes using CHEMCAD version 8.1 software and polymer membranes developed in the CO(2) Hybrid research project. Thus, different configurations such as a single membrane step with and without the use of a vacuum pump and two membrane steps placed in series were analyzed. In all cases, a compressor placed before the membrane system was considered. The use of two serialized stages allows for both high efficiency (minimum 90%) and CO(2) purity of a minimum of 95%. However, the overall plant efficiency decreased from 45.78 to 23.96% and the LCOE increased from 75.6 to 170 €/kWh. The energy consumption required to capture 1 kg of CO(2) is 2.46 MJ(el) and 4.52 MJ(th). MDPI 2022-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9504610/ /pubmed/36135923 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12090904 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Alabid, Maytham Cormos, Calin-Cristian Dinca, Cristian Critical Assessment of Membrane Technology Integration in a Coal-Fired Power Plant |
title | Critical Assessment of Membrane Technology Integration in a Coal-Fired Power Plant |
title_full | Critical Assessment of Membrane Technology Integration in a Coal-Fired Power Plant |
title_fullStr | Critical Assessment of Membrane Technology Integration in a Coal-Fired Power Plant |
title_full_unstemmed | Critical Assessment of Membrane Technology Integration in a Coal-Fired Power Plant |
title_short | Critical Assessment of Membrane Technology Integration in a Coal-Fired Power Plant |
title_sort | critical assessment of membrane technology integration in a coal-fired power plant |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9504610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36135923 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12090904 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alabidmaytham criticalassessmentofmembranetechnologyintegrationinacoalfiredpowerplant AT cormoscalincristian criticalassessmentofmembranetechnologyintegrationinacoalfiredpowerplant AT dincacristian criticalassessmentofmembranetechnologyintegrationinacoalfiredpowerplant |