Cargando…

Critical Assessment of Membrane Technology Integration in a Coal-Fired Power Plant

Despite the many technologies for CO(2) capture (e.g., chemical or physical absorption or adsorption), researchers are looking to develop other technologies that can reduce CAPEX and OPEX costs as well as the energy requirements associated with their integration into thermal power plants. The aim of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alabid, Maytham, Cormos, Calin-Cristian, Dinca, Cristian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9504610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36135923
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12090904
_version_ 1784796260055646208
author Alabid, Maytham
Cormos, Calin-Cristian
Dinca, Cristian
author_facet Alabid, Maytham
Cormos, Calin-Cristian
Dinca, Cristian
author_sort Alabid, Maytham
collection PubMed
description Despite the many technologies for CO(2) capture (e.g., chemical or physical absorption or adsorption), researchers are looking to develop other technologies that can reduce CAPEX and OPEX costs as well as the energy requirements associated with their integration into thermal power plants. The aim of this paper was to analyze the technical and economic integration of spiral wound membranes in a coal-fired power plant with an installed capacity of 330 MW (the case of the Rovinari power plant—in Romania). The study modeled energy processes using CHEMCAD version 8.1 software and polymer membranes developed in the CO(2) Hybrid research project. Thus, different configurations such as a single membrane step with and without the use of a vacuum pump and two membrane steps placed in series were analyzed. In all cases, a compressor placed before the membrane system was considered. The use of two serialized stages allows for both high efficiency (minimum 90%) and CO(2) purity of a minimum of 95%. However, the overall plant efficiency decreased from 45.78 to 23.96% and the LCOE increased from 75.6 to 170 €/kWh. The energy consumption required to capture 1 kg of CO(2) is 2.46 MJ(el) and 4.52 MJ(th).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9504610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95046102022-09-24 Critical Assessment of Membrane Technology Integration in a Coal-Fired Power Plant Alabid, Maytham Cormos, Calin-Cristian Dinca, Cristian Membranes (Basel) Article Despite the many technologies for CO(2) capture (e.g., chemical or physical absorption or adsorption), researchers are looking to develop other technologies that can reduce CAPEX and OPEX costs as well as the energy requirements associated with their integration into thermal power plants. The aim of this paper was to analyze the technical and economic integration of spiral wound membranes in a coal-fired power plant with an installed capacity of 330 MW (the case of the Rovinari power plant—in Romania). The study modeled energy processes using CHEMCAD version 8.1 software and polymer membranes developed in the CO(2) Hybrid research project. Thus, different configurations such as a single membrane step with and without the use of a vacuum pump and two membrane steps placed in series were analyzed. In all cases, a compressor placed before the membrane system was considered. The use of two serialized stages allows for both high efficiency (minimum 90%) and CO(2) purity of a minimum of 95%. However, the overall plant efficiency decreased from 45.78 to 23.96% and the LCOE increased from 75.6 to 170 €/kWh. The energy consumption required to capture 1 kg of CO(2) is 2.46 MJ(el) and 4.52 MJ(th). MDPI 2022-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9504610/ /pubmed/36135923 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12090904 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Alabid, Maytham
Cormos, Calin-Cristian
Dinca, Cristian
Critical Assessment of Membrane Technology Integration in a Coal-Fired Power Plant
title Critical Assessment of Membrane Technology Integration in a Coal-Fired Power Plant
title_full Critical Assessment of Membrane Technology Integration in a Coal-Fired Power Plant
title_fullStr Critical Assessment of Membrane Technology Integration in a Coal-Fired Power Plant
title_full_unstemmed Critical Assessment of Membrane Technology Integration in a Coal-Fired Power Plant
title_short Critical Assessment of Membrane Technology Integration in a Coal-Fired Power Plant
title_sort critical assessment of membrane technology integration in a coal-fired power plant
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9504610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36135923
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12090904
work_keys_str_mv AT alabidmaytham criticalassessmentofmembranetechnologyintegrationinacoalfiredpowerplant
AT cormoscalincristian criticalassessmentofmembranetechnologyintegrationinacoalfiredpowerplant
AT dincacristian criticalassessmentofmembranetechnologyintegrationinacoalfiredpowerplant