Cargando…

Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Control Strategies for a Peristaltically Pumped Low-Pressure Driven Membrane Process

Peristaltic pumping is used in membrane applications where high and sterile sealing is required. However, control is difficult due to the pulsating pump characteristics and the time-varying properties of the system. In this work, three artificial intelligence control strategies (artificial neural ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Díez, José-Luis, Masip-Moret, Vicente, Santafé-Moros, Asunción, Gozálvez-Zafrilla, José M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9504800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36135902
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12090883
_version_ 1784796308313210880
author Díez, José-Luis
Masip-Moret, Vicente
Santafé-Moros, Asunción
Gozálvez-Zafrilla, José M.
author_facet Díez, José-Luis
Masip-Moret, Vicente
Santafé-Moros, Asunción
Gozálvez-Zafrilla, José M.
author_sort Díez, José-Luis
collection PubMed
description Peristaltic pumping is used in membrane applications where high and sterile sealing is required. However, control is difficult due to the pulsating pump characteristics and the time-varying properties of the system. In this work, three artificial intelligence control strategies (artificial neural networks (ANN), fuzzy logic expert systems, and fuzzy-integrated local models) were used to regulate transmembrane pressure and crossflow velocity in a microfiltration system under high fouling conditions. A pilot plant was used to obtain the necessary data to identify the AI models and to test the controllers. Humic acid was employed as a foulant, and cleaning-in-place with NaOH was used to restore the membrane state. Several starting operating points were studied and setpoint changes were performed to study the plant dynamics under different control strategies. The results showed that the control approaches were able to control the membrane system, but significant differences in the dynamics were observed. The ANN control was able to achieve the specifications but showed poor dynamics. Expert control was fast but showed problems in different working areas. Local models required less data than ANN, achieving high accuracy and robustness. Therefore, the technique to be used will depend on the available information and the application dynamics requirements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9504800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95048002022-09-24 Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Control Strategies for a Peristaltically Pumped Low-Pressure Driven Membrane Process Díez, José-Luis Masip-Moret, Vicente Santafé-Moros, Asunción Gozálvez-Zafrilla, José M. Membranes (Basel) Article Peristaltic pumping is used in membrane applications where high and sterile sealing is required. However, control is difficult due to the pulsating pump characteristics and the time-varying properties of the system. In this work, three artificial intelligence control strategies (artificial neural networks (ANN), fuzzy logic expert systems, and fuzzy-integrated local models) were used to regulate transmembrane pressure and crossflow velocity in a microfiltration system under high fouling conditions. A pilot plant was used to obtain the necessary data to identify the AI models and to test the controllers. Humic acid was employed as a foulant, and cleaning-in-place with NaOH was used to restore the membrane state. Several starting operating points were studied and setpoint changes were performed to study the plant dynamics under different control strategies. The results showed that the control approaches were able to control the membrane system, but significant differences in the dynamics were observed. The ANN control was able to achieve the specifications but showed poor dynamics. Expert control was fast but showed problems in different working areas. Local models required less data than ANN, achieving high accuracy and robustness. Therefore, the technique to be used will depend on the available information and the application dynamics requirements. MDPI 2022-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9504800/ /pubmed/36135902 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12090883 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Díez, José-Luis
Masip-Moret, Vicente
Santafé-Moros, Asunción
Gozálvez-Zafrilla, José M.
Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Control Strategies for a Peristaltically Pumped Low-Pressure Driven Membrane Process
title Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Control Strategies for a Peristaltically Pumped Low-Pressure Driven Membrane Process
title_full Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Control Strategies for a Peristaltically Pumped Low-Pressure Driven Membrane Process
title_fullStr Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Control Strategies for a Peristaltically Pumped Low-Pressure Driven Membrane Process
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Control Strategies for a Peristaltically Pumped Low-Pressure Driven Membrane Process
title_short Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Control Strategies for a Peristaltically Pumped Low-Pressure Driven Membrane Process
title_sort comparison of artificial intelligence control strategies for a peristaltically pumped low-pressure driven membrane process
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9504800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36135902
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12090883
work_keys_str_mv AT diezjoseluis comparisonofartificialintelligencecontrolstrategiesforaperistalticallypumpedlowpressuredrivenmembraneprocess
AT masipmoretvicente comparisonofartificialintelligencecontrolstrategiesforaperistalticallypumpedlowpressuredrivenmembraneprocess
AT santafemorosasuncion comparisonofartificialintelligencecontrolstrategiesforaperistalticallypumpedlowpressuredrivenmembraneprocess
AT gozalvezzafrillajosem comparisonofartificialintelligencecontrolstrategiesforaperistalticallypumpedlowpressuredrivenmembraneprocess