Cargando…
Soil CO(2) emissions in cropland with fodder maize (Zea mays L.) with and without riparian buffer strips of differing vegetation
Vegetated land areas play a significant role in determining the fate of carbon (C) in the global C cycle. Riparian buffer vegetation is primarily implemented for water quality purposes as they attenuate pollutants from immediately adjacent croplands before reaching freashwater systems. However, thei...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9504891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36164326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-022-00756-5 |
_version_ | 1784796331215159296 |
---|---|
author | Dlamini, J. C. Cardenas, L. M. Tesfamariam, E. H. Dunn, R. M. Evans, J. Hawkins, J. M. B. Blackwell, M. S. A. Collins, A. L. |
author_facet | Dlamini, J. C. Cardenas, L. M. Tesfamariam, E. H. Dunn, R. M. Evans, J. Hawkins, J. M. B. Blackwell, M. S. A. Collins, A. L. |
author_sort | Dlamini, J. C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Vegetated land areas play a significant role in determining the fate of carbon (C) in the global C cycle. Riparian buffer vegetation is primarily implemented for water quality purposes as they attenuate pollutants from immediately adjacent croplands before reaching freashwater systems. However, their prevailing conditions may sometimes promote the production and subsequent emissions of soil carbon dioxide (CO(2)). Despite this, the understanding of soil CO(2) emissions from riparian buffer vegetation and a direct comparison with adjacent croplands they serve remain elusive. In order to quantify the extent of CO(2) emissions in such an agro system, we measured CO(2) emissions simultaneously with soil and environmental variables for six months in a replicated plot-scale facility comprising of maize cropping served by three vegetated riparian buffers, namely: (i) a novel grass riparian buffer; (ii) a willow riparian buffer, and; (iii) a woodland riparian buffer. These buffered treatments were compared with a no-buffer control. The woodland (322.9 ± 3.1 kg ha(− 1)) and grass (285 ± 2.7 kg ha(− 1)) riparian buffer treatments (not significant to each other) generated significantly (p = < 0.0001) the largest CO(2) compared to the remainder of the treatments. Our results suggest that during maize production in general, the woodland and grass riparian buffers serving a maize crop pose a CO(2) threat. The results of the current study point to the need to consider the benefits for gaseous emissions of mitigation measures conventionally implemented for improving the sustainability of water resources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9504891 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95048912022-09-24 Soil CO(2) emissions in cropland with fodder maize (Zea mays L.) with and without riparian buffer strips of differing vegetation Dlamini, J. C. Cardenas, L. M. Tesfamariam, E. H. Dunn, R. M. Evans, J. Hawkins, J. M. B. Blackwell, M. S. A. Collins, A. L. Agrofor Syst Article Vegetated land areas play a significant role in determining the fate of carbon (C) in the global C cycle. Riparian buffer vegetation is primarily implemented for water quality purposes as they attenuate pollutants from immediately adjacent croplands before reaching freashwater systems. However, their prevailing conditions may sometimes promote the production and subsequent emissions of soil carbon dioxide (CO(2)). Despite this, the understanding of soil CO(2) emissions from riparian buffer vegetation and a direct comparison with adjacent croplands they serve remain elusive. In order to quantify the extent of CO(2) emissions in such an agro system, we measured CO(2) emissions simultaneously with soil and environmental variables for six months in a replicated plot-scale facility comprising of maize cropping served by three vegetated riparian buffers, namely: (i) a novel grass riparian buffer; (ii) a willow riparian buffer, and; (iii) a woodland riparian buffer. These buffered treatments were compared with a no-buffer control. The woodland (322.9 ± 3.1 kg ha(− 1)) and grass (285 ± 2.7 kg ha(− 1)) riparian buffer treatments (not significant to each other) generated significantly (p = < 0.0001) the largest CO(2) compared to the remainder of the treatments. Our results suggest that during maize production in general, the woodland and grass riparian buffers serving a maize crop pose a CO(2) threat. The results of the current study point to the need to consider the benefits for gaseous emissions of mitigation measures conventionally implemented for improving the sustainability of water resources. Springer Netherlands 2022-07-22 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9504891/ /pubmed/36164326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-022-00756-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Dlamini, J. C. Cardenas, L. M. Tesfamariam, E. H. Dunn, R. M. Evans, J. Hawkins, J. M. B. Blackwell, M. S. A. Collins, A. L. Soil CO(2) emissions in cropland with fodder maize (Zea mays L.) with and without riparian buffer strips of differing vegetation |
title | Soil CO(2) emissions in cropland with fodder maize (Zea mays L.) with and without riparian buffer strips of differing vegetation |
title_full | Soil CO(2) emissions in cropland with fodder maize (Zea mays L.) with and without riparian buffer strips of differing vegetation |
title_fullStr | Soil CO(2) emissions in cropland with fodder maize (Zea mays L.) with and without riparian buffer strips of differing vegetation |
title_full_unstemmed | Soil CO(2) emissions in cropland with fodder maize (Zea mays L.) with and without riparian buffer strips of differing vegetation |
title_short | Soil CO(2) emissions in cropland with fodder maize (Zea mays L.) with and without riparian buffer strips of differing vegetation |
title_sort | soil co(2) emissions in cropland with fodder maize (zea mays l.) with and without riparian buffer strips of differing vegetation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9504891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36164326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-022-00756-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dlaminijc soilco2emissionsincroplandwithfoddermaizezeamayslwithandwithoutriparianbufferstripsofdifferingvegetation AT cardenaslm soilco2emissionsincroplandwithfoddermaizezeamayslwithandwithoutriparianbufferstripsofdifferingvegetation AT tesfamariameh soilco2emissionsincroplandwithfoddermaizezeamayslwithandwithoutriparianbufferstripsofdifferingvegetation AT dunnrm soilco2emissionsincroplandwithfoddermaizezeamayslwithandwithoutriparianbufferstripsofdifferingvegetation AT evansj soilco2emissionsincroplandwithfoddermaizezeamayslwithandwithoutriparianbufferstripsofdifferingvegetation AT hawkinsjmb soilco2emissionsincroplandwithfoddermaizezeamayslwithandwithoutriparianbufferstripsofdifferingvegetation AT blackwellmsa soilco2emissionsincroplandwithfoddermaizezeamayslwithandwithoutriparianbufferstripsofdifferingvegetation AT collinsal soilco2emissionsincroplandwithfoddermaizezeamayslwithandwithoutriparianbufferstripsofdifferingvegetation |