Cargando…

Comparative Study Assessing the Canal Cleanliness Using Automated Device and Conventional Syringe Needle for Root Canal Irrigation—An Ex-Vivo Study

The success of endodontic treatment relies on both apical and coronal sealing. To achieve a good three-dimensional seal, the removal of the smear layer becomes mandatory. This study aims to assess the difference in debris accumulation and smear layer formation while using automated root canal irriga...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajamanickam, Keerthika, Teja, Kavalipurapu Venkata, Ramesh, Sindhu, AbuMelha, Abdulaziz S., Alkahtany, Mazen F., Almadi, Khalid H., Bahammam, Sarah Ahmed, Janani, Krishnamachari, Choudhari, Sahil, Jose, Jerry, Srivastava, Kumar Chandan, Shrivastava, Deepti, Patil, Shankargouda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9504894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143496
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15186184
_version_ 1784796332009979904
author Rajamanickam, Keerthika
Teja, Kavalipurapu Venkata
Ramesh, Sindhu
AbuMelha, Abdulaziz S.
Alkahtany, Mazen F.
Almadi, Khalid H.
Bahammam, Sarah Ahmed
Janani, Krishnamachari
Choudhari, Sahil
Jose, Jerry
Srivastava, Kumar Chandan
Shrivastava, Deepti
Patil, Shankargouda
author_facet Rajamanickam, Keerthika
Teja, Kavalipurapu Venkata
Ramesh, Sindhu
AbuMelha, Abdulaziz S.
Alkahtany, Mazen F.
Almadi, Khalid H.
Bahammam, Sarah Ahmed
Janani, Krishnamachari
Choudhari, Sahil
Jose, Jerry
Srivastava, Kumar Chandan
Shrivastava, Deepti
Patil, Shankargouda
author_sort Rajamanickam, Keerthika
collection PubMed
description The success of endodontic treatment relies on both apical and coronal sealing. To achieve a good three-dimensional seal, the removal of the smear layer becomes mandatory. This study aims to assess the difference in debris accumulation and smear layer formation while using automated root canal irrigation and conventional syringe needle irrigation. Single-rooted human mandibular premolar teeth (n = 30) which were indicated for orthodontic extractions were selected. An endodontic access cavity was prepared, and a glide path was created. Based on the irrigation protocol decided upon for the study, the teeth were randomly allocated into three study groups, namely Group 1, where the manual syringe needle irrigation method was adopted; Group 2, in which automated root canal irrigation was undertaken; and Group 3, in which teeth remained un-instrumented as it was considered the Control group. The teeth were decoronated at the cement-enamel junction (CEJ) and were subjected for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) examination. Debris and smear layers were viewed in 1000× magnification and scored. A statistically significant (p < 0.05) lower mean debris and smear layer score (p < 0.05) was observed in both study groups when compared with the control group. However, no significant difference (p > 0.05) in the debris and smear layer was observed between the manual syringe needle irrigation and automated irrigation, although automated irrigation devices can be a potential alternative. The present study concluded that the efficacy of smear layer removal remained the same with both automated irrigation and manual syringe irrigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9504894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95048942022-09-24 Comparative Study Assessing the Canal Cleanliness Using Automated Device and Conventional Syringe Needle for Root Canal Irrigation—An Ex-Vivo Study Rajamanickam, Keerthika Teja, Kavalipurapu Venkata Ramesh, Sindhu AbuMelha, Abdulaziz S. Alkahtany, Mazen F. Almadi, Khalid H. Bahammam, Sarah Ahmed Janani, Krishnamachari Choudhari, Sahil Jose, Jerry Srivastava, Kumar Chandan Shrivastava, Deepti Patil, Shankargouda Materials (Basel) Article The success of endodontic treatment relies on both apical and coronal sealing. To achieve a good three-dimensional seal, the removal of the smear layer becomes mandatory. This study aims to assess the difference in debris accumulation and smear layer formation while using automated root canal irrigation and conventional syringe needle irrigation. Single-rooted human mandibular premolar teeth (n = 30) which were indicated for orthodontic extractions were selected. An endodontic access cavity was prepared, and a glide path was created. Based on the irrigation protocol decided upon for the study, the teeth were randomly allocated into three study groups, namely Group 1, where the manual syringe needle irrigation method was adopted; Group 2, in which automated root canal irrigation was undertaken; and Group 3, in which teeth remained un-instrumented as it was considered the Control group. The teeth were decoronated at the cement-enamel junction (CEJ) and were subjected for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) examination. Debris and smear layers were viewed in 1000× magnification and scored. A statistically significant (p < 0.05) lower mean debris and smear layer score (p < 0.05) was observed in both study groups when compared with the control group. However, no significant difference (p > 0.05) in the debris and smear layer was observed between the manual syringe needle irrigation and automated irrigation, although automated irrigation devices can be a potential alternative. The present study concluded that the efficacy of smear layer removal remained the same with both automated irrigation and manual syringe irrigation. MDPI 2022-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9504894/ /pubmed/36143496 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15186184 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rajamanickam, Keerthika
Teja, Kavalipurapu Venkata
Ramesh, Sindhu
AbuMelha, Abdulaziz S.
Alkahtany, Mazen F.
Almadi, Khalid H.
Bahammam, Sarah Ahmed
Janani, Krishnamachari
Choudhari, Sahil
Jose, Jerry
Srivastava, Kumar Chandan
Shrivastava, Deepti
Patil, Shankargouda
Comparative Study Assessing the Canal Cleanliness Using Automated Device and Conventional Syringe Needle for Root Canal Irrigation—An Ex-Vivo Study
title Comparative Study Assessing the Canal Cleanliness Using Automated Device and Conventional Syringe Needle for Root Canal Irrigation—An Ex-Vivo Study
title_full Comparative Study Assessing the Canal Cleanliness Using Automated Device and Conventional Syringe Needle for Root Canal Irrigation—An Ex-Vivo Study
title_fullStr Comparative Study Assessing the Canal Cleanliness Using Automated Device and Conventional Syringe Needle for Root Canal Irrigation—An Ex-Vivo Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study Assessing the Canal Cleanliness Using Automated Device and Conventional Syringe Needle for Root Canal Irrigation—An Ex-Vivo Study
title_short Comparative Study Assessing the Canal Cleanliness Using Automated Device and Conventional Syringe Needle for Root Canal Irrigation—An Ex-Vivo Study
title_sort comparative study assessing the canal cleanliness using automated device and conventional syringe needle for root canal irrigation—an ex-vivo study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9504894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143496
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15186184
work_keys_str_mv AT rajamanickamkeerthika comparativestudyassessingthecanalcleanlinessusingautomateddeviceandconventionalsyringeneedleforrootcanalirrigationanexvivostudy
AT tejakavalipurapuvenkata comparativestudyassessingthecanalcleanlinessusingautomateddeviceandconventionalsyringeneedleforrootcanalirrigationanexvivostudy
AT rameshsindhu comparativestudyassessingthecanalcleanlinessusingautomateddeviceandconventionalsyringeneedleforrootcanalirrigationanexvivostudy
AT abumelhaabdulazizs comparativestudyassessingthecanalcleanlinessusingautomateddeviceandconventionalsyringeneedleforrootcanalirrigationanexvivostudy
AT alkahtanymazenf comparativestudyassessingthecanalcleanlinessusingautomateddeviceandconventionalsyringeneedleforrootcanalirrigationanexvivostudy
AT almadikhalidh comparativestudyassessingthecanalcleanlinessusingautomateddeviceandconventionalsyringeneedleforrootcanalirrigationanexvivostudy
AT bahammamsarahahmed comparativestudyassessingthecanalcleanlinessusingautomateddeviceandconventionalsyringeneedleforrootcanalirrigationanexvivostudy
AT jananikrishnamachari comparativestudyassessingthecanalcleanlinessusingautomateddeviceandconventionalsyringeneedleforrootcanalirrigationanexvivostudy
AT choudharisahil comparativestudyassessingthecanalcleanlinessusingautomateddeviceandconventionalsyringeneedleforrootcanalirrigationanexvivostudy
AT josejerry comparativestudyassessingthecanalcleanlinessusingautomateddeviceandconventionalsyringeneedleforrootcanalirrigationanexvivostudy
AT srivastavakumarchandan comparativestudyassessingthecanalcleanlinessusingautomateddeviceandconventionalsyringeneedleforrootcanalirrigationanexvivostudy
AT shrivastavadeepti comparativestudyassessingthecanalcleanlinessusingautomateddeviceandconventionalsyringeneedleforrootcanalirrigationanexvivostudy
AT patilshankargouda comparativestudyassessingthecanalcleanlinessusingautomateddeviceandconventionalsyringeneedleforrootcanalirrigationanexvivostudy