Cargando…
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) Test in Node-Negative Early Breast Cancer
BACKGROUND: The 21-gene assay (the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) test) is a validated multigene assay which produces the Recurrence Score(®) result (RS) to inform decisions on the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), hormone receptor pos...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9505370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36157054 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S360049 |
_version_ | 1784796455679033344 |
---|---|
author | Berdunov, Vladislav Millen, Steve Paramore, Andrew Griffin, Jane Reynia, Sarah Fryer, Nina Brown, Rebecca Longworth, Louise |
author_facet | Berdunov, Vladislav Millen, Steve Paramore, Andrew Griffin, Jane Reynia, Sarah Fryer, Nina Brown, Rebecca Longworth, Louise |
author_sort | Berdunov, Vladislav |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The 21-gene assay (the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) test) is a validated multigene assay which produces the Recurrence Score(®) result (RS) to inform decisions on the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), hormone receptor positive (HR+) early invasive breast cancer. A model-based economic evaluation estimated the cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene assay against the use of clinical risk tools alone based on the latest evidence from prospective studies. METHODS: The proportion of patients assigned to chemotherapy conditional on their RS result was obtained from retrospective data from the Clalit registry. The probability of distant recurrence with endocrine and chemo-endocrine therapy conditional on RS result was obtained from TAILORx and NSABP B-20 trials. The cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene assay compared to using clinical risk tools alone was estimated in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) over a lifetime horizon. RESULTS: The 21-gene assay was more effective (0.17 more quality-adjusted life years) at a lower cost (-£519) over a lifetime compared to clinical risk alone. The model results were sensitive to assumptions around the magnitude of benefit of chemotherapy in the high RS result subgroup. Other assumptions underpinning the model, such as the proportion of patients assigned to chemotherapy in the low and mid-range RS result subgroups and long-term distant recurrence probabilities, had a smaller impact on the results. CONCLUSION: The analysis showed that the cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene assay is sensitive to assumptions for chemotherapy sparing for patients with RS 0–25 whose outcomes with endocrine therapy are no worse compared to chemotherapy-assigned patients, and a chemotherapy benefit in the RS 26–100 group. Future studies need to incorporate a wider set of tumour profiling tests other than the 21-gene assay to allow a direct comparison of their cost-effectiveness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9505370 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95053702022-09-24 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) Test in Node-Negative Early Breast Cancer Berdunov, Vladislav Millen, Steve Paramore, Andrew Griffin, Jane Reynia, Sarah Fryer, Nina Brown, Rebecca Longworth, Louise Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The 21-gene assay (the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) test) is a validated multigene assay which produces the Recurrence Score(®) result (RS) to inform decisions on the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), hormone receptor positive (HR+) early invasive breast cancer. A model-based economic evaluation estimated the cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene assay against the use of clinical risk tools alone based on the latest evidence from prospective studies. METHODS: The proportion of patients assigned to chemotherapy conditional on their RS result was obtained from retrospective data from the Clalit registry. The probability of distant recurrence with endocrine and chemo-endocrine therapy conditional on RS result was obtained from TAILORx and NSABP B-20 trials. The cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene assay compared to using clinical risk tools alone was estimated in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) over a lifetime horizon. RESULTS: The 21-gene assay was more effective (0.17 more quality-adjusted life years) at a lower cost (-£519) over a lifetime compared to clinical risk alone. The model results were sensitive to assumptions around the magnitude of benefit of chemotherapy in the high RS result subgroup. Other assumptions underpinning the model, such as the proportion of patients assigned to chemotherapy in the low and mid-range RS result subgroups and long-term distant recurrence probabilities, had a smaller impact on the results. CONCLUSION: The analysis showed that the cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene assay is sensitive to assumptions for chemotherapy sparing for patients with RS 0–25 whose outcomes with endocrine therapy are no worse compared to chemotherapy-assigned patients, and a chemotherapy benefit in the RS 26–100 group. Future studies need to incorporate a wider set of tumour profiling tests other than the 21-gene assay to allow a direct comparison of their cost-effectiveness. Dove 2022-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9505370/ /pubmed/36157054 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S360049 Text en © 2022 Berdunov et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Berdunov, Vladislav Millen, Steve Paramore, Andrew Griffin, Jane Reynia, Sarah Fryer, Nina Brown, Rebecca Longworth, Louise Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) Test in Node-Negative Early Breast Cancer |
title | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) Test in Node-Negative Early Breast Cancer |
title_full | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) Test in Node-Negative Early Breast Cancer |
title_fullStr | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) Test in Node-Negative Early Breast Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) Test in Node-Negative Early Breast Cancer |
title_short | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) Test in Node-Negative Early Breast Cancer |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness analysis of the oncotype dx breast recurrence score(®) test in node-negative early breast cancer |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9505370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36157054 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S360049 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT berdunovvladislav costeffectivenessanalysisoftheoncotypedxbreastrecurrencescoretestinnodenegativeearlybreastcancer AT millensteve costeffectivenessanalysisoftheoncotypedxbreastrecurrencescoretestinnodenegativeearlybreastcancer AT paramoreandrew costeffectivenessanalysisoftheoncotypedxbreastrecurrencescoretestinnodenegativeearlybreastcancer AT griffinjane costeffectivenessanalysisoftheoncotypedxbreastrecurrencescoretestinnodenegativeearlybreastcancer AT reyniasarah costeffectivenessanalysisoftheoncotypedxbreastrecurrencescoretestinnodenegativeearlybreastcancer AT fryernina costeffectivenessanalysisoftheoncotypedxbreastrecurrencescoretestinnodenegativeearlybreastcancer AT brownrebecca costeffectivenessanalysisoftheoncotypedxbreastrecurrencescoretestinnodenegativeearlybreastcancer AT longworthlouise costeffectivenessanalysisoftheoncotypedxbreastrecurrencescoretestinnodenegativeearlybreastcancer |