Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) Test in Node-Negative Early Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND: The 21-gene assay (the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) test) is a validated multigene assay which produces the Recurrence Score(®) result (RS) to inform decisions on the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), hormone receptor pos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berdunov, Vladislav, Millen, Steve, Paramore, Andrew, Griffin, Jane, Reynia, Sarah, Fryer, Nina, Brown, Rebecca, Longworth, Louise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9505370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36157054
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S360049
_version_ 1784796455679033344
author Berdunov, Vladislav
Millen, Steve
Paramore, Andrew
Griffin, Jane
Reynia, Sarah
Fryer, Nina
Brown, Rebecca
Longworth, Louise
author_facet Berdunov, Vladislav
Millen, Steve
Paramore, Andrew
Griffin, Jane
Reynia, Sarah
Fryer, Nina
Brown, Rebecca
Longworth, Louise
author_sort Berdunov, Vladislav
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The 21-gene assay (the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) test) is a validated multigene assay which produces the Recurrence Score(®) result (RS) to inform decisions on the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), hormone receptor positive (HR+) early invasive breast cancer. A model-based economic evaluation estimated the cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene assay against the use of clinical risk tools alone based on the latest evidence from prospective studies. METHODS: The proportion of patients assigned to chemotherapy conditional on their RS result was obtained from retrospective data from the Clalit registry. The probability of distant recurrence with endocrine and chemo-endocrine therapy conditional on RS result was obtained from TAILORx and NSABP B-20 trials. The cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene assay compared to using clinical risk tools alone was estimated in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) over a lifetime horizon. RESULTS: The 21-gene assay was more effective (0.17 more quality-adjusted life years) at a lower cost (-£519) over a lifetime compared to clinical risk alone. The model results were sensitive to assumptions around the magnitude of benefit of chemotherapy in the high RS result subgroup. Other assumptions underpinning the model, such as the proportion of patients assigned to chemotherapy in the low and mid-range RS result subgroups and long-term distant recurrence probabilities, had a smaller impact on the results. CONCLUSION: The analysis showed that the cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene assay is sensitive to assumptions for chemotherapy sparing for patients with RS 0–25 whose outcomes with endocrine therapy are no worse compared to chemotherapy-assigned patients, and a chemotherapy benefit in the RS 26–100 group. Future studies need to incorporate a wider set of tumour profiling tests other than the 21-gene assay to allow a direct comparison of their cost-effectiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9505370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95053702022-09-24 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) Test in Node-Negative Early Breast Cancer Berdunov, Vladislav Millen, Steve Paramore, Andrew Griffin, Jane Reynia, Sarah Fryer, Nina Brown, Rebecca Longworth, Louise Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The 21-gene assay (the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) test) is a validated multigene assay which produces the Recurrence Score(®) result (RS) to inform decisions on the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), hormone receptor positive (HR+) early invasive breast cancer. A model-based economic evaluation estimated the cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene assay against the use of clinical risk tools alone based on the latest evidence from prospective studies. METHODS: The proportion of patients assigned to chemotherapy conditional on their RS result was obtained from retrospective data from the Clalit registry. The probability of distant recurrence with endocrine and chemo-endocrine therapy conditional on RS result was obtained from TAILORx and NSABP B-20 trials. The cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene assay compared to using clinical risk tools alone was estimated in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) over a lifetime horizon. RESULTS: The 21-gene assay was more effective (0.17 more quality-adjusted life years) at a lower cost (-£519) over a lifetime compared to clinical risk alone. The model results were sensitive to assumptions around the magnitude of benefit of chemotherapy in the high RS result subgroup. Other assumptions underpinning the model, such as the proportion of patients assigned to chemotherapy in the low and mid-range RS result subgroups and long-term distant recurrence probabilities, had a smaller impact on the results. CONCLUSION: The analysis showed that the cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene assay is sensitive to assumptions for chemotherapy sparing for patients with RS 0–25 whose outcomes with endocrine therapy are no worse compared to chemotherapy-assigned patients, and a chemotherapy benefit in the RS 26–100 group. Future studies need to incorporate a wider set of tumour profiling tests other than the 21-gene assay to allow a direct comparison of their cost-effectiveness. Dove 2022-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9505370/ /pubmed/36157054 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S360049 Text en © 2022 Berdunov et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Berdunov, Vladislav
Millen, Steve
Paramore, Andrew
Griffin, Jane
Reynia, Sarah
Fryer, Nina
Brown, Rebecca
Longworth, Louise
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) Test in Node-Negative Early Breast Cancer
title Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) Test in Node-Negative Early Breast Cancer
title_full Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) Test in Node-Negative Early Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) Test in Node-Negative Early Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) Test in Node-Negative Early Breast Cancer
title_short Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) Test in Node-Negative Early Breast Cancer
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of the oncotype dx breast recurrence score(®) test in node-negative early breast cancer
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9505370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36157054
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S360049
work_keys_str_mv AT berdunovvladislav costeffectivenessanalysisoftheoncotypedxbreastrecurrencescoretestinnodenegativeearlybreastcancer
AT millensteve costeffectivenessanalysisoftheoncotypedxbreastrecurrencescoretestinnodenegativeearlybreastcancer
AT paramoreandrew costeffectivenessanalysisoftheoncotypedxbreastrecurrencescoretestinnodenegativeearlybreastcancer
AT griffinjane costeffectivenessanalysisoftheoncotypedxbreastrecurrencescoretestinnodenegativeearlybreastcancer
AT reyniasarah costeffectivenessanalysisoftheoncotypedxbreastrecurrencescoretestinnodenegativeearlybreastcancer
AT fryernina costeffectivenessanalysisoftheoncotypedxbreastrecurrencescoretestinnodenegativeearlybreastcancer
AT brownrebecca costeffectivenessanalysisoftheoncotypedxbreastrecurrencescoretestinnodenegativeearlybreastcancer
AT longworthlouise costeffectivenessanalysisoftheoncotypedxbreastrecurrencescoretestinnodenegativeearlybreastcancer