Cargando…

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Physiology in AL Amyloidosis Patients with Cardiac Involvement and Its Association with Cardiac Imaging Parameters

Background: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) has been widely used for the functional evaluation of patients with heart failure. Patients with amyloidosis and cardiac involvement typically present with heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction. We sought to evaluate the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Briasoulis, Alexandros, Theodorakakou, Foteini, Rempakos, Athanasios, Petropoulos, Ioannis, Gavriatopoulou, Maria, Androulakis, Emmanuel, Stamatelopoulos, Kimon, Kallianos, Anastasios, Trakada, Georgia, Dimopoulos, Meletios Athanasios, Kastritis, Efstathios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9505621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143084
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185437
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) has been widely used for the functional evaluation of patients with heart failure. Patients with amyloidosis and cardiac involvement typically present with heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction. We sought to evaluate the use of CPET parameters in patients with AL amyloidosis for the assessment of disease severity and prognosis and their association with cardiac imaging findings. Methods: A single-center prospective analysis was conducted, which included 23 consecutive ambulatory patients with AL amyloidosis with cardiac involvement, not requiring hospitalization or intravenous diuretics. Patient evaluation included CPET, laboratory testing, echocardiography and cardiac MRI. The cohort was divided according to the presence of high-risk CPET characteristics (below median peak VO2 and above median VE/VCO2). Results: Patients with AL amyloidosis and cardiac involvement (median age was 60 years (56.5% males) had median peak relative VO2 (VO2/kg) of 17.8 mL/kg/min, VE/VCO2 slope of 39.4 and circulatory power of 2362.5 mmHg⋅mL/kg/min. Peak relative VO2 gradually declined across Mayo stages (p = 0.046) and exhibited a significant inverse correlation with NT-proBNP levels (r = −0.52, p = 0.01). Among imaging parameters, peak VO2 positively correlated with global work efficiency (r = 0.61, p < 0.001), and global work index (r = 0.45, p = 0.04). The group of patients with high-risk CPET findings showed evidence of more advanced disease, such as higher NT-proBNP levels (p = 0.007), increased septal and posterior left ventricular wall thickness (p = 0.043 and p = 0.033 respectively) and decreased global work efficiency (p = 0.027) without substantial differences in cardiac MRI parameters. In this group of patients, peak VO2 and VE/VCO2 were not associated significantly with overall survival and cardiac response at one year. Conclusion: In patients with AL amyloidosis, evaluation of exercise capacity with CPET identified a group of patients with more advanced cardiac involvement. The potential of CPET as a risk stratification tool in AL amyloidosis with cardiac involvement warrants further research.